Xiaoyan Li
Naomi Yamashita
Susan R. Fussell
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Non-native speakers (NNS) often face challenges gaining the speaking floor in conversations with native speakers (NS) of a common language. To help NNS to contribute more, we developed a conversational agent that opens up the speaking floor either automatically, after NS have taken a certain number of consecutive speaking turns, or manually, upon NNS request. We compared these automatic and manual agents to a control condition in a laboratory study in which one NNS collaborated with two NS using English as a common language. Participants (N=48) communicated over video conferencing from separate locations in a research institution to collaborate on three survival tasks. Based on data gathered from the experiments, the automatic agent encouraged NNS to participate more, which previous studies had attempted but failed to achieve. Excerpts from group discussions further showed the crucial role of the automatic agent on NNS participation. Interview results suggested that while NNS appreciated the automatic agent's help to participation, NS perceived the agent's interruption as unfair because they thought all members were speaking equally, which was not the case. The mismatch in their perceptions further emphasizes the need to intervene, and we provide design implications based on the results.
- Mark Aakhus and Sally Jackson. 2005. Technology, interaction, and design. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, 411--436.Google Scholar
- Hiroyuki Adachi, Myojin Seiko and Shimada Nobutaka Shimada. 2015. ScoringTalk: a tablet system scoring and visualizing conversation for balancing of participation. SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications (Kobe Japan, Nov. 2015), 1--5.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jo Angouri. 2013. The multilingual reality of the multinational workplace: Language policy and language use. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34, 6: 564--581. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.807273Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alberto Alesina and Eliana La Ferrara. 1999. Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847--904. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554935Google ScholarCross Ref
- Geoffrey W. Beattie. 1981. The regulation of speaker turns in face-to-face conversation: Some implications for conversation in sound-only communication channels. Semiotica 34, 55--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laurent Bègue, Jean Léon Beauvois, Didier Courbet, Dominique Oberlé, Johan Lepage, and Aaron A. Duke. 2015. Personality Predicts Obedience in a M ilgram Paradigm. Journal of Personality, 83(3), 299--306.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Timothy Bickmore, Daniel Mauer, Francisco Crespo, and Thomas Brown. 2007. Persuasion, task interruption and health regimen adherence. In International conference on persuasive technology (pp. 1--11). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--77006-0_1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. 2000. The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Cynthia Breazeal and Brian Scassellati. 1999. A Context-Dependent Attention System for a Social Robot. In Proceedings of 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 1146--1151. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1624312.1624382Google Scholar
- Julia Cambre and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2019. One Voice Fits All?: Social Implications and Research Challenges of Designing Voices for Smart Devices. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359325Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xun Cao, Naomi Yamashita and Toru Ishida. 2018. Effects of Automated Transcripts on Non-native Speakers' Listening Comprehension. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol.E101-D, No.03, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2017EDP7255Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erran Carmel (1999). Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Justine Cassell, Matthew Stone and Hao Yan. 2000. Coordination and context-dependence in the generation of embodied conversation. In INLG'2000 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Natural Language Generation. Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3115/1118253.1118277Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rebecca Cherng-Shiow Chang, Hsi-Peng Lu, and Peishan Yang. 2018. Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior 84 (July 2018), 194--210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.025Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mei-Ling Chen, Naomi Yamashita and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2018. Beyond Lingua Franca: System-Facilitated Language Switching Diversifies Participation in Multiparty Multilingual Communication. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW, Article 34 (November 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274303Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Cutler and Mark Pearson. 1986. On the analysis of prosodic turn-taking cues. In Intonation in Discourse. College-Hill, San Diego, CA, pp. 139--156.Google Scholar
- Starkey Duncan. 1972. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 23(2), p.283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ilana Diamant, Brian Lim, Andy Echenique, Gilly Leshed, and Susan R. Fussell. 2009. Supporting intercultural collaboration with dynamic feedback systems: preliminary evidence from a creative design task. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3997--4002. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520607Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joan Morris DiMicco, Anna Pandolfo, and Walter Bender. 2004. Influencing group participation with a shared display. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 614--623. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031713Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wen Duan, Naomi Yamashita and Susan R. Fussell. 2019. Increasing Native Speakers' Awareness of the Need to Slow Down in Multilingual Conversations Using a Real-Time Speech Speedometer. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, No. CSCW, Article 171 November 2019. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359273Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vitaly J. Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler, and Beheruz N. Sethna. 1991. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119--146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norah E. Dunbar and Judee K. Burgoon. 2005. Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22, 2 (2005), 207--233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505050944Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cecilia E. Ford and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, pp. 134--184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heather A. Faucett, Matthew L. Lee, and Scott Carter. 2017. I Should Listen More: Real-time Sensing and Feedback of Non-Verbal Communication in Video Telehealth. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1--19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3134679Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fu Carolyn, Kritika Dhanda, Marc Exposito Gomez, Haeyoung Kim, and Yan Zhang. 2017. TurnTable: Towards More Equivalent Turn-Taking. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 609--615.Google Scholar
- Ge Gao, Hao-Chuan Wang, Dan Cosley and Susan R. Fussell. 2013. Same translation but different experience: The effects of highlighting on machine-translated conversations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 449--458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470719Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ge Gao, Naomi Yamashita, Ari MJ Hautasaari, Andy Echenique, and Susan R. Fussell. 2014. Effects of Public vs. Private Automated Transcripts on Multiparty Communication Between Native and Non-native English Speakers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 843--852. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557303Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ge Gao, Naomi Yamashita, Ari Hautasaari, and Susan R. Fussell. 2015. Improving multilingual collaboration by displaying how non-native speakers use automated transcripts and bilingual dictionaries. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3463--3472. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702498Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ge Gao, Bin Xu, David C. Hau, Zheng Yao, Dan Cosley, and Susan R. Fussell. 2015. Two is Better Than One: Improving Multilingual Collaboration by Giving Two Machine Translation Outputs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW' 15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 852--863. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675197Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ge Gao, and Susan R. Fussell. 2017. A kaleidoscope of languages: When and how non-Native English speakers shift between English and their Native language during multilingual teamwork. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3025453.3025839Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barney G Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Erving Goffman. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
- Charles Goodwin and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 2004. Participation, in A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, pp. 222--43. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Agustín Gravano and Julia Hirschberg. 2011. Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue. Computer Speech & Language, 25(3), pp.601--634.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gisli H. Gudjonsson, Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson, Olafur O. Bragason, Emil Einarsson, and Eva B. Valdimarsdottir. 2004. Compliance and personality: The vulnerability of the unstable introvert. European Journal of Personality, 18(5), 435--443.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward Twitchell Hall. 1976. Beyond culture, New York: Anchor Press--Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Jay Hall and W. H. Watson. 1970. The effects of normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Human Relations, 23, 299--317. doi.org/10.1177/001872677002300404Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1998. Development of NASA-TLX: Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139--183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166--4115(08)62386--9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mattias Heldner and Jens Edlund. 2010. Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics 38, 4: 555--568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helen A. He and Elaine M. Huang. 2014. A qualitative study of workplace intercultural communication tensions in dyadic face-to-face and computer-mediated interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS' 14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 415--424. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598594Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen A. He, Naomi Yamashita, Ari Hautasaari, Xun Cao, and Elaine M. Huang. 2017. Why Did They Do That? Exploring Attribution Mismatches Between Native and Non-Native Speakers Using Videoconferencing. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW' 17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 297--309. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2998181.2998205Google ScholarDigital Library
- Naoko Morita. 2004. Negotiating Participation and Identity in Second Language Academic Communities. TESOL Quarterly 38 (4): 573--603. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588281Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pamela J. Hinds, Tsedal B. Neeley, and Catherine D. Cramton. 2014. Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. Journal of International Business Studies 45, 5: 536--561. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.62Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanneke Houtkoop and Harrie Mazeland. 1985. Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 9:595--619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378--2166(85)90055--4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maddy Janssens and Jeanne M. Brett. 2006. Cultural Intelligence in Global Teams: A Fusion Model of Collaboration. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 124--153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601105275268Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gail Jefferson. 1988. Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a standard maximum silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Oliver P. John, and Sanjay Srivastava. 1999. The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Klein, Youngme Moon, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2002. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with computers, 14(2), 119--140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953--5438(01)00053--4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daan Van Knippenberg. 2000. Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied psychology, 49(3), 357--371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00020Google ScholarCross Ref
- JC Lafferty, Patrick M Eady, and J Elmers. 1974. The desert survival problem. Experimental Learning Methods (1974).Google Scholar
- Kornel Laskowski, 2010. Modeling norms of turn-taking in multi-party conversation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 999--1008).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gene H. Lerner. 2003. Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society 32, 177--201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202XGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Gilly Leshed, Dan Cosley, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Geri Gay. 2010. Visualizing language use in team conversations: Designing through theory, experiments, and iterations. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4567--4582. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754195Google ScholarDigital Library
- Han Z. Li, Young-ok Yum, Robin Yates, Laura Aguilera, Ying Mao, and Yue Zheng. 2005. Interruption and Involvement in Discourse: Can Intercultural Interlocutors be Trained? Journal of lntercultural Communication Research 34, 4: 233--254.Google Scholar
- Huisi (Jessica) Li, Connie Y. Yuan, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Bradford S. Bell. 2018. Talk and Let Talk: The Effects of Language Proficiency on Speaking Up and Competence Perceptions in Multinational Teams. Group & Organization Management 44, no. 5 (October 2019): 953--89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118756734Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiaoshi Li, and Xuerui Jia. 2006. Why don't you speak up?: East Asian students' participation patterns in American and Chinese ESL classrooms. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), 192.Google Scholar
- Jessica Lipnack and Jeffrey Stamp (1997). Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karen K. Liu, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2005. Embedded empathy in continuous, interactive health assessment. In CHI Workshop on HCI Challenges in Health Assessment (Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 3).Google Scholar
- Yadong Luo and Oded Shenkar. 2006. The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 321--339. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400197Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerald Matthews, Ian J. Deary, & Martha C. Whiteman. 2003. Personality traits. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Nicoleta Meslec and Petru L. Cureu. 2013. Too close or too far hurts: cognitive distance and group cognitive synergy. Small Group Research, 44(5), 471--497. http://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413491988Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lorenza Mondada. 2012. The dynamics of embodied participation and language choice in multilingual meetings. Language in Society, 41(2), 213--235. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41487754Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raffaella Negretti and Miguel Garcia-Yeste. 2014. "Lunch Keeps People Apart': The Role of English for Social Interaction in a Multilingual Academic Workplace. Multilingua, 34(1), 93--118. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014--1038Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duyen T. Nguyen and Susan R. Fussell. 2013. Effects of Message Content on Cognitive and Affective Processes in Cross-culture and Same-culture Instant Messaging Conversations. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW' 13). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441782Google ScholarDigital Library
- A.C. Norwine and O.J. Murphy. 1938. Characteristic time intervals in telephonic conversation. Bell System Technical Journal, 17(2), pp.281--291.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mei-hua Pan, Naomi Yamashita, and Hao-chuan Wang. 2017. Task Rebalancing: Improving Multilingual Communication with Native Speakers - Generated Highlights on Automated Transcripts. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW' 17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998304Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rui Prada, Samuel Ma, and Maria Augusta Nunes. 2009. Personality in social group dynamics. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (Vol. 4, pp. 607--612). IEEE.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela Rogerson-Revell. 2007. Using English for international business: A European case study. English for Specific Purposes 26. 103--120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pamela Rogerson-Revell. 2008. Participation and performance in international business meetings. English for Specific Purposes 24. 401--421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathon Ryan, and Leslie Forrest. 2019. "No chance to speak': developing a pedagogical response to turn-taking problems. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1687709Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In Language 50: 696--735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243Google ScholarCross Ref
- Claude Sammut. 2001. Managing Context in a Conversational Agent. Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 3(7):1--13.Google Scholar
- Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2003. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society 29, 1--63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pnina Shachaf. 2008. Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information Management, 45, 131--142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Günter K Stahl, Martha L Maznevski, Andreas Voigt, and Karsten Jonsen. "Unraveling the Effects of Cultural Diversity in Teams: A Meta-analysis of Research on Multicultural Work Groups." Journal of International Business Studies 41, no. 4 (2010): 690--709. Accessed April 3, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/40604760Google Scholar
- Garold Stasser and Laurie A. Taylor. 1991. Speaking Turns in Face-To-Face Discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 60, 5, 675--684. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022--3514.60.5.675Google ScholarCross Ref
- Garold Stasser and William Titus. 1987. Effects of Information Load and Percentage of Shared Information on the Dissemination of Unshared Information during Group Discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 53 (1), 81--93. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022--3514.53.1.81Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jane F. Stephens. 1987. Towards a Model of Turn-taking in Conversation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
- Dennis D. Stewart and Garold Stasser. 1996. The Sampling of Critical, Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups: The Role of an Informed Minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, vol 28, 95--113. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1%3C95::AID-EJSP847%3E3.0.CO;2-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emma Sweeney and Zhu Hua. 2010. Accommodating toward your audience: Do native speakers of English know how to accommodate their communication strategies toward nonnative speakers of English? Journal of Business Communication 47, 4: 477--504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377308Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanne Tange & Jakob Lauring. 2009. Language management and social interaction within the multilingual workplace. Journal of Communication Management, 13, 218--232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Avril Thorne. 1987. The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 718.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hao-Chuan Wang, Susan R. Fussell and Dan Cosley. 2013. Machine translation vs. Common language: Effects on idea exchange in cross-lingual groups. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW' 13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 935--944. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2441776.2441882Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nigel Ward and Wataru Tsukahara. 2000. Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 23: p. 1177--1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378--2166(99)00109--5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Naomi Yamashita, and Toru Ishida. 2006. Effects of machine translation on collaborative work. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW' 06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 515--523. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180955Google ScholarDigital Library
- Naomi Yamashita, Andy Echenique, Toru Ishida, and Ari Hautasaari. 2013. Lost in Transmittance: How Transmission Lag Enhances and Deteriorates Multilingual Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing Social Computing (CSCW' 13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 923--934. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441881Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela Rogerson-Revell. 2008. Participation and performance in international business meetings. English for Specific Purposes 27, 3: 338--360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth Shriberg, Andreas Stolcke, and Don Baron. 2001. Observations on overlap: Findings and implications for automatic processing of multi-party conversation. In Seventh European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karl Weilhammer and Susan Rabold. 2003. Durational aspects in turn taking. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2145--2148).Google Scholar
- John Wiemann and Mark Knapp. 2017. Turn-taking in conversations. Communication Theory, pp.226--245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Victor Yngve. 1970. On getting a word in edgewise. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting [of the] Chicago Linguistic Society, page 568.Google Scholar
- Chien Wen Yuan, Leslie D. Setlock, Dan Cosley, and Susan R. Fussell. 2013. Understanding informal communication in multilingual contexts. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW' 13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 909--922. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441880Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Whittaker. 2003. Theories and methods in mediated communication. In The Handbook of Discourse Processes, A. C. Graesser,M. A. Gernsbacher, and S. R. Goldman, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 243--286.Google Scholar
- Connie Yuan, Natalya N. Bazarova, Janet Fulk, and Zhi-Xue Zhang. 2013. Recognition of expertise and perceived influence in intercultural group collaboration. Journal of Communication, Volume 63, Issue 3, June 2013, Pages 476--497. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12026Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yohtaro Takano and Akiko Noda. 1993. A temporary decline of thinking ability during foreign language processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 24, 4: 445--462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022193244005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ilana Volfin and Israel Cohen. 2013. Dominant speaker identification for multipoint videoconferencing. Computer Speech Language, 27(4):895 -- 910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2012.03.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- ATLAS.ti: The Qualitative Data Analysis Research Software. Retrieved from http://atlasti.comGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Improving Non-Native Speakers' Participation with an Automatic Agent in Multilingual Groups
Recommendations
Bridging Fluency Disparity between Native and Nonnative Speakers in Multilingual Multiparty Collaboration Using a Clarification Agent
CSCW2Multiparty collaboration using a common language is often challenging for nonnative speakers (NNS). Conversation can move forward rapidly, with terms and references unfamiliar to NNS often going unexplained because NNS do not request clarification due to ...
Increasing Native Speakers' Awareness of the Need to Slow Down in Multilingual Conversations Using a Real-Time Speech Speedometer
Collaborating using a common language can be challenging for non-native speakers (NNS). These challenges can be reduced when native speakers (NS) adjust their speech behavior for NNS, for example by speaking more slowly. In this study, we examined ...
Improving Multilingual Collaboration by Displaying How Non-native Speakers Use Automated Transcripts and Bilingual Dictionaries
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsConversational grounding, or establishing mutual knowledge that messages have been understood as intended, can be difficult to achieve when some conversational participants are using a non-native language. These difficulties in grounding can be ...
Comments