skip to main content
10.1145/3557915.3560995acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Connected vehicle simulation framework for parking occupancy prediction (demo paper)

Published:22 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper demonstrates a simulation framework that collects data about connected vehicles' locations and surroundings in a realistic traffic scenario. Our focus lies on the capability to detect parking spots and their occupancy status. We use this data to train machine learning models that predict parking occupancy levels of specific areas in the city center of San Francisco. By comparing their performance to a given ground truth, our results show that it is possible to use simulated connected vehicle data as a base for prototyping meaningful AI-based applications.

References

  1. Michael Balmer, Kay W Axhausen, and Kai Nagel. 2006. Agent-based demand-modeling framework for large-scale microsimulations. Transportation Research Record 1985, 1 (2006), 125--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fabian Bock, Sergio Di Martino, and Antonio Origlia. 2019. Smart parking: Using a crowd of taxis to sense on-street parking space availability. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 2 (2019), 496--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xiao Chen. 2014. Parking occupancy prediction and pattern analysis. Dept. Comput. Sci., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA, Tech. Rep. CS229-2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lara Codecá, Jakob Erdmann, and Jérôme Härri. 2018. A sumo-based parking management framework for large-scale smart cities simulations. In 2018 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shuhui Gong, Xiaopeng Mo, Rui Cao, Yu Liu, Wei Tu, and Ruibin Bai. 2021. Spatio-temporal Parking Behaviour Forecasting and Analysis Before and During COVID-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07731 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Heejae Kim, Jiyong Han, Seong-Hwan Kim, Jisoo Choi, Dongsik Yoon, Minsu Jeon, Eunjoo Yang, Nhat Pham, Sungpil Woo, Jeongkyu Park, et al. 2017. IsV2C: An integrated road traffic-network-cloud simulator for V2C connected car services. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC). IEEE, 434--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ludovic Leclercq, Alméria Sénécat, and Guilhem Mariotte. 2017. Dynamic macroscopic simulation of on-street parking search: A trip-based approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 101 (2017), 268--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Matan Levi, Yair Allouche, and Aryeh Kontorovich. 2018. Advanced analytics for connected car cybersecurity. In 2018 IEEE 87th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Pablo Alvarez Lopez, Michael Behrisch, Laura Bieker-Walz, Jakob Erdmann, Yun-Pang Flötteröd, Robert Hilbrich, Leonhard Lücken, Johannes Rummel, Peter Wagner, and Evamarie Wießner. 2018. Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO, In The 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). https://elib.dlr.de/124092/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Antonio Origlia, Sergio Di Martino, and Yuri Attanasio. 2019. On-Line Filtering of On-Street Parking Data to Improve Availability Predictions. In 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Michal Piorkowski, Natasa Sarafijanovic-Djukic, and Matthias Grossglauser. 2009. CRAWDAD dataset epfl/mobility (v. 2009-02-24). Downloaded from https://crawdad.org/epfl/mobility/20090224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Thi Thuy An Vo, Peter van der Waerden, and Geert Wets. 2016. Micro-simulation of car drivers' movements at parking lots. Procedia engineering 142 (2016), 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shuguan Yang, Wei Ma, Xidong Pi, and Sean Qian. 2019. A deep learning approach to real-time parking occupancy prediction in transportation networks incorporating multiple spatio-temporal data sources. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 107 (2019), 248--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Connected vehicle simulation framework for parking occupancy prediction (demo paper)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '22: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2022
      806 pages
      ISBN:9781450395298
      DOI:10.1145/3557915

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 November 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • demonstration

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader