Dakuo Wang
Michael Muller
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Geographically distributed teams often face challenges in coordination and collaboration, lowering their productivity. Understanding the relationship between team dispersion and productivity is critical for supporting such teams. Extensive prior research has studied these relations in lab settings or using qualitative measures. This paper extends prior work by contributing an empirical case study in a real-world organization, using quantitative measures. We studied 117 new research project teams from the same discipline within an industrial research lab for 6 months. During this time, all teams shared one goal: submitting research papers to the same target conference. We analyzed these teams' dispersion-related characteristics as well as team productivity. Interestingly, we found little statistical evidence that geographic and time differences relate to team productivity. However, organizational and functional distances are predictive of the productivity of the dispersed teams we studied. We discuss the open research questions these findings revealed and their implications for future research.
- Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, and Gianluca Murgia. 2013. Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics 7, 4 (2013), 811--822.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed and Shion Guha. 2012. Distance matters: an exploratory analysis of the linguistic features of Flickr photo tag metadata in relation to impression management. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Databases and Social Networks. 7--12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas J Allen et al. 1984. Managing the flowof technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. MIT Press Books 1 (1984).Google Scholar
- Teresa M Amabile, Chelley Patterson, Jennifer Mueller, Tom Wojcik, Paul W Odomirok, Mel Marsh, and Steven J Kramer. 2001. Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal 44, 2 (2001), 418--431.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aris Anagnostopoulos, Luca Becchetti, Carlos Castillo, Aristides Gionis, and Stefano Leonardi. 2012. Online team formation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 839--848.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Indranil Bardhan, Vish V. Krishnan, and Shu Lin. 2013. Team Dispersion, Information Technology, and Project Performance. Production and Operations Management 22, 6 (2013), 1478--1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937--5956. 2012.01366.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1937--5956.2012.01366.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Pernille Bjørn, Morten Esbensen, Rasmus Eskild Jensen, and Stina Matthiesen. 2014. Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 21, 5 (2014), 1--26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erin Bradner and Gloria Mark. 2002. Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 226--235.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joel Chan, Steven Dow, and Christian Schunn. 2014. Conceptual distance matters when building on others' ideas in crowd-collaborative innovation platforms. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 141--144.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catherine Durnell Cramton and Pamela J Hinds. 2004. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in organizational behavior 26 (2004), 231--263.Google Scholar
- J Alberto Espinosa, Jonathon N Cummings, Jeanne M Wilson, and Brandi M Pearce. 2003. Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. Journal of Management Information Systems 19, 4 (2003), 157--190.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andy Field. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. sage.Google Scholar
- Mary Frank Fox. 1992. Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of education (1992), 293--305.Google Scholar
- Darren Gergle and Desney S Tan. 2014. Experimental research in HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 191--227.Google Scholar
- Diego Gómez-Zará, Matthew Paras, Marlon Twyman, Jacqueline N Lane, Leslie A DeChurch, and Noshir S Contractor. 2019. Who Would You Like to Work With?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--15.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Terri L Griffith, John E Sawyer, and Margaret A Neale. 2003. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS quarterly (2003), 265--287.Google Scholar
- Rebecca E Grinter, James D Herbsleb, and Dewayne E Perry. 1999. The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work. In Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. ACM, 306--315.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Grudin. 1995. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. In Readings in Human-- Computer Interaction. Elsevier, 762--774.Google Scholar
- Alexa M Harris, Diego Gómez-Zará, Leslie A DeChurch, and Noshir S Contractor. 2019. Joining together online: the trajectory of CSCW scholarship on group formation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve R Harrison and Paul Dourish. 1996. Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems.. In CSCW, Vol. 96. 67--76.Google ScholarDigital Library
- James D Herbsleb, Audris Mockus, Thomas A Finholt, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2000. Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 319--328.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela Hinds, Daniela Retelny, and Catherine Cramton. 2015. In the flow, being heard, and having opportunities: Sources of power and power dynamics in global teams. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 864--875.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pamela J Hinds and Diane E Bailey. 2003. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization science 14, 6 (2003), 615--632.Google Scholar
- Sujin K Horwitz and Irwin B Horwitz. 2007. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of management 33, 6 (2007), 987--1015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leif Jarle Gressgård. 2011. Virtual team collaboration and innovation in organizations. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 17, 1/2 (2011), 102--119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Malte F Jung. 2016. Coupling interactions and performance: Predicting team performance from thin slices of conflict. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 23, 3 (2016), 1--32.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shipra Kayan, Susan R Fussell, and Leslie D Setlock. 2006. Cultural differences in the use of instant messaging in Asia and North America. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 525--528.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pranam Kolari, Tim Finin, Yelena Yesha, Yaacov Yesha, Kelly Lyons, Stephen Perelgut, Jen Hawkins, et al. 2007. On the structure, properties and utility of internal corporate blogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007).Google Scholar
- Robert E Kraut and Lynn A Streeter. 1995. Coordination in software development. Commun. ACM 38, 3 (1995), 69--82.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefano Lambiase, Gemma Catolino, Damian A Tamburri, Alexander Serebrenik, Fabio Palomba, and Filomena Ferrucci. 2022. Good Fences Make Good Neighbours? On the Impact of Cultural and Geographical Dispersion on Community Smells. (2022).Google Scholar
- Richard Layton, Matthew Ohland, and Hal Pomeranz. 2007. Software for student team formation and peer evaluation: CATME incorporates Team-Maker. (2007).Google Scholar
- Ioanna Lykourentzou, Angeliki Antoniou, Yannick Naudet, and Steven P Dow. 2016. Personality matters: Balancing for personality types leads to better outcomes for crowd teams. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer- Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 260--273.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ioanna Lykourentzou, Shannon Wang, Robert E Kraut, and Steven P Dow. 2016. Team dating: A self-organized team formation strategy for collaborative crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1243--1249.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martha L Maznevski and Katherine M Chudoba. 2000. Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness. Organization Science 11, 5 (2000), 473--492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanushree Mitra, Michael Muller, N Sadat Shami, Abbas Golestani, and Mikhil Masli. 2017. Spread of Employee Engagement in a Large Organizational Network: A Longitudinal Analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 81.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Muller, Susan R Fussell, Ge Gao, Pamela J Hinds, Nigini Oliveira, Katharina Reinecke, Lionel Robert Jr, Kanya Siangliulue, Volker Wulf, and Chien-Wen Yuan. 2019. Learning from Team and Group Diversity: Nurturing and Benefiting from our Heterogeneity. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 498--505.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Muller, Werner Geyer, Todd Soule, and John Wafer. 2014. Geographical and organizational distances in enterprise crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 778--789.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Muller, N Sadat Shami, Shion Guha, Mikhil Masli, Werner Geyer, and Alan Wild. 2016. Influences of peers, friends, and managers on employee engagement. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 131--136.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Boyer O'Leary and Jonathon N Cummings. 2007. The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS quarterly (2007), 433--452.Google Scholar
- Michael Boyer O'Leary and Mark Mortensen. 2010. Go (con) figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science 21, 1 (2010), 115--131.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 2000. Distance matters. Human--computer interaction 15, 2--3 (2000), 139--178.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith S Olson, Gary M Olson, Marianne Storrøsten, and Mark Carter. 1993. Groupwork close up: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 11, 4 (1993), 321--348.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith S Olson, DakuoWang, Gary M Olson, and Jingwen Zhang. 2017. How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 24, 1 (2017), 1--40.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey T Polzer, C Brad Crisp, Sirkka L Jarvenpaa, and Jerry W Kim. 2006. Extending the Faultline Model to Geographically Dispersed Teams: How Colocated Subgroups can Impair Group Functioning. Academy of Management Journal 49, 4 (2006), 679--692. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083024Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steven G Rogelberg and StevenMRumery. 1996. Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small group research 27, 1 (1996), 79--90.Google Scholar
- Daniel M Russell and Ed H Chi. 2014. Looking back: Retrospective study methods for HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 373--393.Google Scholar
- Jerome H Schiele. 1995. Submission rates among African-American faculty: The forgotten side of publication productivity. Journal of Social Work Education 31, 1 (1995), 46--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John C Tang, Chen Zhao, Xiang Cao, and Kori Inkpen. 2011. Your time zone or mine?: a study of globally time zone-shifted collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 235--244.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daan Van Knippenberg and Michaela C Schippers. 2007. Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58 (2007), 515--541.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bogdan Vasilescu, Daryl Posnett, Baishakhi Ray, Mark GJ van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Premkumar Devanbu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 3789--3798.Google Scholar
- Dakuo Wang, Judith S Olson, Jingwen Zhang, Trung Nguyen, and Gary M Olson. 2015. DocuViz: visualizing collaborative writing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 1865--1874.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dakuo Wang, Haoyu Wang, Mo Yu, Zahra Ashktorab, and Ming Tan. 2022. Group Chat Ecology in Enterprise Instant Messaging: How Employees Collaborate Through Multi-User Chat Channels on Slack. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW1 (2022), 1--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- MiaomiaoWen, Keith Maki, Steven Dow, James D Herbsleb, and Carolyn Rose. 2017. Supporting virtual team formation through community-wide deliberation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 109.Google Scholar
- MARK E WHITING, ALLIE BLAISING, CHLOE BARREAU, LAURA FIUZA, NIK MARDA, MELISSA VALENTINE, and MICHAEL S BERNSTEIN. 2019. Did It Have To End This Way? Understanding the Consistency of Team Fracture. (2019).Google Scholar
- KY Williams and CA O'Reilly III. 1998. Demography and Diversity in Organisations: A review of 40 years of research in BM Staw and LL Cummings (eds) Research in Organisational Behaviour Vol. 20. Jai Pres, Connecticut (1998).Google Scholar
- Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W Malone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. science 330, 6004 (2010), 686--688.Google Scholar
- Soobin Yim, Dakuo Wang, Judith Olson, Viet Vu, and Mark Warschauer. 2017. Synchronous writing in the classroom: Undergraduates' collaborative practices and their impact on text quality, quantity, and style. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'17), Vol. 10.Google Scholar
- Jun Zhang and Mark S Ackerman. 2005. Searching for expertise in social networks: a simulation of potential strategies. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. ACM, 71--80.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhilin Zheng, Tim Vogelsang, and Niels Pinkwart. 2015. The impact of small learning group composition on student engagement and success in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Educational Data Mining. 500--503.Google Scholar
- Haiyi Zhu, Robert Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Organizing without formal organization: group identification, goal setting and social modeling in directing online production. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 935--944.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Organizational Distance Also Matters: How Organizational Distance Among Industrial Research Teams Affect Their Research Productivity
Recommendations
IT-enabled inter-organisational relationships and collaborative innovation: integration of IT design and relationships governance
Firms developing collaborative innovation from IT-enabled inter-organisational relationships IORs are faced with both technological and relational challenges. Drawing on knowledge-based view, this paper first proposes a model to integrate IT design with ...
Organizational commitment of IT workers: leader support and differences across gender and race
SIGMIS-CPR '13: Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference on Computers and people researchThe purpose of this study is to determine how psychosocial mentoring, career mentoring and leader-member exchange (LMX) contribute to organizational commitment for IT workers, as well as how these relationships differ according to race and gender. We ...
Organizational survival and alignment: insights into conflicting perspectives on the role of the IT professional
SIGMIS CPR '04: Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environmentDifferent organizational theories clearly define critical organizational activities necessary for organizational survival. Recent attention to "hybrid" research that links organizational theory with MIS research has been proposed to lend new insights ...
Comments