skip to main content
10.1145/3544548.3581489acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“I See Me Here”: Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTok

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms are a place where people look for information and social support for mental health, resulting in both positive and negative effects on users. TikTok has gained notoriety for an abundance of mental health content and discourse. We present findings from a semi-structured interview study with 16 participants about mental health content and participants’ perceptions of community on TikTok. We find that TikTok’s community structure is permeable, allowing for self-discovery and understanding not found in traditional online communities. However, participants are wary of mental health information due to conflicts between a creator’s vulnerability and credibility. Our interviews suggest that the “For You Page" is a runaway train that encourages diverse community and content engagement but also displays harmful content that participants feel they cannot escape. We propose design implications to support better mental health, as well as implications for social computing research on community in algorithmic landscapes.

Footnotes

  1. 1 These proprietary features use metadata about the survey takers (e.g., speed of completion, IP address) to assign a score that evaluates whether the survey taker is genuine in their survey taking. See https://www.qualtrics.com/support/survey-platform/survey-module/survey-checker/fraud-detection/

    Footnote
  2. 2 The interviewer used what they had learned from the video review and visual elicitation exercises to tailor the semi-structured questions to each participant based on their experiences, perceptions, and talking points.

    Footnote
  3. 3 rejection sensitive dysphoria is an intense emotional reaction due to the perception that a person has been rejected [9]

    Footnote
  4. 4 https://www.tiktok.com/@elle.argent/video/7080209086180085035

    Footnote
  5. 5 https://www.tiktok.com/@therapyjeff/video/7125511003986562347

    Footnote
  6. 6 https://www.tiktok.com/@yourkoreandad/video/7125117855258905902

    Footnote
  7. 7 https://www.tiktok.com/@connorcallec/video/7110728158692855041

    Footnote
Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544548.3581489-talk-video.mp4

mp4

130.1 MB

References

  1. Patricia A Adler and Peter Adler. 1987. Membership roles in field research. Vol. 6. Sage, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 5(2018), 1–35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. American Psychological Association. 2019. Mental health issues increased significantly in young adults over last decade. Retrieved December 12, 2022 from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190315110908.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Corey H Basch, Lorie Donelle, Joseph Fera, and Christie Jaime. 2022. Deconstructing TikTok videos on mental health: cross-sectional, descriptive content analysis. JMIR formative research 6, 5 (2022), e38340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Natalie Berry, Fiona Lobban, Maksim Belousov, Richard Emsley, Goran Nenadic, and Sandra Bucci. 2017. #WhyWeTweetMH: Understanding Why People Use Twitter to Discuss Mental Health Problems. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, 4 (2017), e6173. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Aparajita Bhandari and Sara Bimo. 2022. Why’s Everyone on TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self and the Future of Self-Making on Social Media. Social Media+ Society 8, 1 (2022), 20563051221086241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnna Blair and Saeed Abdullah. 2018. Supporting Constructive Mental Health Discourse in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare(PervasiveHealth ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240930Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Anita L Blanchard and M Lynne Markus. 2004. The experienced" sense" of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM Sigmis Database: the database for advances in information systems 35, 1(2004), 64–79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrea Bonior. 2019. What is rejection sensitive dysphoria?Retrieved September 8, 2022 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/friendship-20/201907/what-is-rejection-sensitive-dysphoriaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ted K Bradshaw. 2008. The post-place community: Contributions to the debate about the definition of community. Community Development 39, 1 (2008), 5–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gillian Brown, Max Marshall, Peter Bower, Adrine Woodham, and Waquas Waheed. 2014. Barriers to recruiting ethnic minorities to mental health research: a systematic review. International journal of methods in psychiatric research 23, 1(2014), 36–48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eleanor R Burgess, Kathryn E Ringland, Jennifer Nicholas, Ashley A Knapp, Jordan Eschler, David C Mohr, and Madhu C Reddy. 2019. "I think people are powerful" The Sociality of Individuals Managing Depression. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly Caine. 2016. Local standards for sample size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 981–992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christina Caron. 2022. Teens turn to TikTok in search of a mental health diagnosis. Retrieved September 8, 2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/29/well/mind/tiktok-mental-illness-diagnosis.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan Lin, Erica L Goodman, Stephanie Zerwas, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. Quantifying and predicting mental illness severity in online pro-eating disorder communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1171–1184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stevie Chancellor, Jessica Annette Pater, Trustin Clear, Eric Gilbert, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. # thyghgapp: Instagram content moderation and lexical variation in pro-eating disorder communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 1201–1213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kathy Charmaz, Liska Belgrave, 2012. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft 2 (2012), 347–365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Eugene Ch’ng. 2015. The bottom-up formation and maintenance of a Twitter community: Analysis of the #FreeJahar Twitter community. Industrial Management & Data Systems 115, 4 (2015), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2014-0332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental Health Discourse on reddit: Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Anonymity. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Geoffrey Comp, Sean Dyer, and Michael Gottlieb. 2021. Is TikTok the next social media frontier for medicine?AEM Education and Training 5, 3 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelley Cotter, Julia R DeCook, Shaheen Kanthawala, and Kali Foyle. 2022. In FYP We Trust: The Divine Force of Algorithmic Conspirituality. International Journal of Communication 16 (2022), 1–23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Carolyn E Cutrona and Daniel W Russell. 1990. Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching.In Social support: An interactional view, B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, and G. R. Pierce (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, 319–366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael F Dahlstrom. 2021. The narrative truth about scientific misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 15(2021), e1914085117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ivan De Martino, Rocco D’Apolito, Alexander S McLawhorn, Keith A Fehring, Peter K Sculco, and Giorgio Gasparini. 2017. Social media for patients: benefits and drawbacks. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine 10, 1 (2017), 141–145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Andrew Devendorf, Ansley Bender, and Jonathan Rottenberg. 2020. Depression presentations, stigma, and mental health literacy: A critical review and YouTube content analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 78 (2020), 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Michael A. DeVito. 2019. User Adaptation to Constant Change in Algorithmically-Driven Social Platforms. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Michael Ann DeVito. 2022. How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk Theorization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2, 1–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Michael Ann DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, and Julia R. Fernandez. 2021. Values (Mis)alignment: Exploring Tensions Between Platform and LGBTQ+ Community Design Values. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1(2021), 88:1–88:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Meagan Drillinger. 2022. What to Know About Using TikTok as a Mental Health Resource. Retrieved September 8, 2022 from https://www.healthline.com/health-news/what-to-know-about-using-tiktok-as-a-mental-health-resourceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Tristan Labetoulle, Fred Bane, Michael L Birnbaum, Asra F Rizvi, John M Kane, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2018. Characterizing audience engagement and assessing its impact on social media disclosures of mental illnesses. In Twelfth international AAAI conference on web and social media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jessica L. Feuston. 2019. Algorithms, Oppression, and Mental Illness on Social Media. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299072Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Beyond the Coded Gaze: Analyzing Expression of Mental Health and Illness on Instagram. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 51:1–51:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jessica L. Feuston and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Everyday Experiences: Small Stories and Mental Illness on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. R Gilmore, J Beezhold, V Selwyn, R Howard, I Bartolome, and N Henderson. 2022. Is TikTok increasing the number of self-diagnoses of ADHD in young people?European Psychiatry 65, S1 (2022), S571–S571.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Crystal Gong, Koustuv Saha, and Stevie Chancellor. 2021. " The Smartest Decision for My Future": Social Media Reveals Challenges and Stress During Post-College Life Transition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2(2021), 1–29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jina Huh and Mark S Ackerman. 2012. Collaborative help in chronic disease management: supporting individualized problems. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 853–862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jeffrey C Johnson and Susan C Weller. 2002. Elicitation techniques for interviewing. Handbook of interview research: Context and method (2002), 491–514.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Marius Kaminskas and Derek Bridge. 2016. Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: a survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 7, 1(2016), 1–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nadia Karizat, Dan Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co-produce Knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2(2021), 1–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wenwen Kong, Shijie Song, Yuxiang Chris Zhao, Qinghua Zhu, Ling Sha, 2021. TikTok as a health information source: assessment of the quality of information in diabetes-related videos. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, 9 (2021), e30409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Kelli María Korducki. 2022. TikTok trends or the pandemic? What’s behind the rise in ADHD diagnoses. Retrieved September 8, 2022 from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jun/02/tiktok-trends-or-the-pandemic-whats-behind-the-rise-in-adhd-diagnosesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Robert E Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. E. Megan Lachmar, Andrea K. Wittenborn, Katherine W. Bogen, and Heather L. McCauley. 2017. #MyDepressionLooksLike: Examining Public Discourse About Depression on Twitter. JMIR Mental Health 4, 4 (2017), e8141. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.8141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Annie YS Lau, Elia Gabarron, Luis Fernandez-Luque, and Manuel Armayones. 2012. Social media in health—what are the safety concerns for health consumers?Health Information Management Journal 41, 2 (2012), 30–35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Daniel Le Compte and Daniel Klug. 2021. “It’s Viral!” - A Study of the Behaviors, Practices, and Motivations of TikTok Users and Social Activism. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481741Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Alex Leavitt. 2015. " This is a Throwaway Account" Temporary Technical Identities and Perceptions of Anonymity in a Massive Online Community. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 317–327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Yachao Li, Mengfei Guan, Paige Hammond, and Lane E Berrey. 2021. Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: a content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health education research 36, 3 (2021), 261–271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Alice E Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society 13, 1 (2011), 114–133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Katerina Eva Matsa. 2022. More Americans are getting news on TikTok, bucking the trend on other social media sites. (2022). https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/10/21/more-americans-are-getting-news-on-tiktok-bucking-the-trend-on-other-social-media-sites/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Darragh McCashin and Colette M Murphy. 2022. Using TikTok for public and youth mental health–A systematic review and content analysis. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry(2022), 13591045221106608.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. David W. McMillan and David M. Chavis. 1986. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology 14, 1 (1986), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-IGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Nicole Messina. 2021. IT’S THERE FOR YOU, BUT IS IT #FYP?: A METHODOLOGICAL REFLECTION OF RESEARCHING CONTENT VS. COMMUNITY ON TIKTOK. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research(2021). https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.11982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Ashlee Milton and Stevie Chancellor. 2022. The Users Aren’t Alright: Dangerous Mental Illness Behaviors and Recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03941(2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. J. A. Naslund, K. A. Aschbrenner, L. A. Marsch, and S. J. Bartels. 2016. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 25, 2 (2016), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. TikTok Newsroom. 2020. How TikTok recommends videos #ForYou. Retrieved December 12, 2022 from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/how-tiktok-recommends-videos-for-youGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. TikTok Newsroom. 2021. Thanks a billion!Retrieved December 12, 2022 from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/1-billion-people-on-tiktokGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Ray Oldenburg. 1999. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Da Capo Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Adam M Ostrovsky and Joshua R Chen. 2020. TikTok and its role in COVID-19 information propagation. Journal of adolescent health 67, 5 (2020), 730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Albert Park, Mike Conway, and Annie T. Chen. 2018. Examining thematic similarity, difference, and membership in three online mental health communities from reddit: A text mining and visualization approach. Computers in Human Behavior 78 (2018), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Robert Plant. 2004. Online communities. Technology in society 26, 1 (2004), 51–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Constance Elise Porter. 2004. A typology of virtual communities: A multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. Journal of computer-mediated communication 10, 1 (2004), JCMC1011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Claudette Pretorius, Derek Chambers, David Coyle, 2019. Young people’s online help-seeking and mental health difficulties: Systematic narrative review. Journal of medical Internet research 21, 11 (2019), e13873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Claudette Pretorius, Darragh McCashin, and David Coyle. 2022. Mental health professionals as influencers on TikTok and Instagram: What role do they play in mental health literacy and help-seeking?Internet Interventions(2022), 100591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Dana Rotman and Jennifer Preece. 2010. The ’WeTube’ in YouTube – creating an online community through video sharing. International Journal of Web Based Communities 6, 3(2010), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2010.033755Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Kitty Rusking. 2022. For Some Women With ADHD, TikTok Is the First Place They Felt Heard. Retrieved December 1, 2022 from https://time.com/6211695/adhd-tiktok-women/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Catherine Sanchez, Adrienne Grzenda, Andrea Varias, Alik S Widge, Linda L Carpenter, William M McDonald, Charles B Nemeroff, Ned H Kalin, Glenn Martin, Mauricio Tohen, 2020. Social media recruitment for mental health research: a systematic review. Comprehensive psychiatry 103 (2020), 152197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Ellen Simpson, Andrew Hamann, and Bryan Semaan. 2022. How to Tame" Your" Algorithm: LGBTQ+ Users’ Domestication of TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, GROUP(2022), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Ellen Simpson and Bryan Semaan. 2021. For You, or For"You"? Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3(2021), 252:1–252:34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432951Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Chris Stokel-Walker. 2020. TikTok’s global surge. New Scientist 245, 3273 (2020), 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Lyndall Strazdins and Dorothy H Broom. 2007. The mental health costs and benefits of giving social support.International Journal of Stress Management 14, 4 (2007), 370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Victor Suarez-Lledo, Javier Alvarez-Galvez, 2021. Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research 23, 1 (2021), e17187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Na Sun, Patrick Pei-Luen Rau, and Liang Ma. 2014. Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 38 (2014), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Na Sun, Patrick Pei-Luen Rau, and Liang Ma. 2014. Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 38 (2014), 110–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Beth Teitell. 2022. Teens and young adults are self-diagnosing mental illness on TikTok. what could go wrong?Retrieved September 8, 2022 from https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/11/15/metro/teens-young-adults-are-self-diagnosing-mental-illness-tiktok-what-could-go-wrong/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Emily A Vogels, Risa Gelles-Watnick, and Navid Massarat. 2022. Teens, social media and technology 2022. (2022). https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2644169/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/3667002/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Jennifer P Wisdom, Kevin Bruce, Goal Auzeen Saedi, Teresa Weis, and Carla A Green. 2008. ‘Stealing me from myself’: Identity and recovery in personal accounts of mental illness. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42, 6(2008), 489–495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Lu Yan and Yong Tan. 2014. Feeling blue? Go online: an empirical study of social support among patients. Information Systems Research 25, 4 (2014), 690–709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Anthony Yeung, Enoch Ng, and Elia Abi-Jaoude. 2022. TikTok and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Media Content Quality. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry(2022), 07067437221082854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Marco Zenone, Nikki Ow, and Skye Barbic. 2021. TikTok and public health: a proposed research agenda. BMJ Global Health 6, 11 (2021), e007648. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007648Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Zhongju Zhang. 2009. Feeling the sense of community in social networking usage. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 57, 2 (2009), 225–239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. SUE Ziebland and Sally Wyke. 2012. Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people’s health?The Milbank Quarterly 90, 2 (2012), 219–249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. “I See Me Here”: Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTok

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2023
          14911 pages
          ISBN:9781450394215
          DOI:10.1145/3544548

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 April 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format