skip to main content
research-article

Position-Enhanced and Time-aware Graph Convolutional Network for Sequential Recommendations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 January 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The sequential recommendation (also known as the next-item recommendation), which aims to predict the following item to recommend in a session according to users’ historical behavior, plays a critical role in improving session-based recommender systems. Most of the existing deep learning-based approaches utilize the recurrent neural network architecture or self-attention to model the sequential patterns and temporal influence among a user's historical behavior and learn the user's preference at a specific time. However, these methods have two main drawbacks. First, they focus on modeling users’ dynamic states from a user-centric perspective and always neglect the dynamics of items over time. Second, most of them deal with only the first-order user-item interactions and do not consider the high-order connectivity between users and items, which has recently been proved helpful for the sequential recommendation. To address the above problems, in this article, we attempt to model user-item interactions by a bipartite graph structure and propose a new recommendation approach based on a Position-enhanced and Time-aware Graph Convolutional Network (PTGCN) for the sequential recommendation. PTGCN models the sequential patterns and temporal dynamics between user-item interactions by defining a position-enhanced and time-aware graph convolution operation and learning the dynamic representations of users and items simultaneously on the bipartite graph with a self-attention aggregator. Also, it realizes the high-order connectivity between users and items by stacking multi-layer graph convolutions. To demonstrate the effectiveness of PTGCN, we carried out a comprehensive evaluation of PTGCN on three real-world datasets of different sizes compared with a few competitive baselines. Experimental results indicate that PTGCN outperforms several state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models in terms of two commonly-used evaluation metrics for ranking. In particular, it can make a better trade-off between recommendation performance and model training efficiency, which holds great potential for online session-based recommendation scenarios in the future.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Rendle Steffen, Freudenthaler Christoph, and Schmidt-Thieme Lars. 2010. Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 811820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] He Ruining, Kang Wang-Cheng, and McAuley Julian J.. 2017. Translation-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 161169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] He Ruining and McAuley Julian J.. 2016. Fusing similarity models with Markov chains for sparse sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE Computer Society, 191200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Huang Jin, Zhao Wayne Xin, Dou Hongjian, Wen Ji-Rong, and Chang Edward Y.. 2018. Improving sequential recommendation with knowledge-enhanced memory networks. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 505514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Kang Wang-Cheng and McAuley Julian J.. 2018. Self-attentive sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE Computer Society, 197206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Hidasi Balázs and Karatzoglou Alexandros. 2018. Recurrent neural networks with top-k gains for session-based recommendations. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 843852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Hidasi Balázs, Karatzoglou Alexandros, Baltrunas Linas, and Tikk Domonkos. 2015. Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks. arXiv:1511.06939. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06939.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Tang Jiaxi and Wang Ke. 2018. Personalized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 565573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Li Jiacheng, Wang Yujie, and McAuley Julian J.. 2020. Time interval aware self-attention for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 322330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Huang Liwei, Ma Yutao, Liu Yanbo, and Kumar Sangaiah Arun. 2020. Multi-modal Bayesian embedding for point-of-interest recommendation on location-based cyber-physical-social networks. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 108, (2020), 11191128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Huang Liwei, Ma Yutao, Wang Shibo, and Liu Yanbo. 2021. An attention-based spatiotemporal LSTM network for next POI recommendation. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 14, 6 (2021), 1585--1597.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Liu Qiang, Wu Shu, Wang Diyi, Li Zhaokang, and Wang Liang. 2016. Context-aware sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE Computer Society, 10531058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Kumar Srijan, Zhang Xikun, and Leskovec Jure. 2019. Predicting dynamic embedding trajectory in temporal interaction networks. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 12691278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Wang Xiang, He Xiangnan, Wang Meng, Feng Fuli, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2019. Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 165174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Wang Shoujin, Hu Liang, Wang Yan, Sheng Quan Z., Orgun Mehmet A., and Cao Longbing. 2020. Intention nets: Psychology-inspired user choice behavior modeling for next-basket prediction. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 62596266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Guo Lei, Tang Li, Chen Tong, Zhu Lei, Viet Hung Nguyen Quoc, and Yin Hongzhi. 2021. DA-GCN: A domain-aware attentive graph convolution network for shared-account cross-domain sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ijcai.org, 24832489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Ma Chen, Ma Liheng, Zhang Yingxue, Sun Jianing, Liu Xue, and Coates Mark. 2020. Memory augmented graph neural networks for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 50455052.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Chang Jianxin, Gao Chen, Zheng Yu, Hui Yiqun, Niu Yanan, Song Yang, Jin Depeng, and Li Yong. 2021. Sequential recommendation with graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 378387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Hsu Cheng and Li Cheng-Te. 2021. RetaGNN: Relational temporal attentive graph neural networks for holistic sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. ACM, 29682979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Ying Rex, He Ruining, Chen Kaifeng, Eksombatchai Pong, Hamilton William L., and Leskovec Jure. 2018. Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 974983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] van den Berg Rianne, Kipf Thomas N., and Welling Max. 2017. Graph convolutional matrix completion. arXiv:1706.02263. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Zheng Lei, Lu Chun-Ta, Jiang Fei, Zhang Jiawei, and Yu Philip S.. 2018. Spectral collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 311319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Zhao Jun, Zhou Zhou, Guan Ziyu, Zhao Wei, Ning Wei, Qiu Guang, and He Xiaofei. 2019. IntentGC: A scalable graph convolution framework fusing heterogeneous information for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 23472357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Chen Lei, Wu Le, Hong Richang, Zhang Kun, and Wang Meng. 2020. Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: A linear residual graph convolutional network approach. In Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Sun Jianing, Zhang Yingxue, Guo Wei, Guo Huifeng, Tang Ruiming, He Xiuqiang, Ma Chen, and Coates Mark. 2020. Neighbor interaction aware graph convolution networks for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 12891298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] He Xiangnan, Deng Kuan, Wang Xiang, Li Yan, Zhang Yong-Dong, and Wang Meng. 2020. LightGCN: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 639648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Pasricha Rajiv and McAuley Julian J.. 2018. Translation-based factorization machines for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 6371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Hochreiter Sepp and Schmidhuber Jürgen. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 8 (1997), 17351780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Li Jing, Ren Pengjie, Chen Zhumin, Ren Zhaochun, Lian Tao, and Ma Jun. 2017. Neural attentive session-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 14191428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Chen Xu, Xu Hongteng, Zhang Yongfeng, Tang Jiaxi, Cao Yixin, Qin Zheng, and Zha Hongyuan. 2018. Sequential recommendation with user memory networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 108116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Wang Meirui, Ren Pengjie, Mei Lei, Chen Zhumin, Ma Jun, and de Rijke Maarten. 2019. A collaborative session-based recommendation approach with parallel memory modules. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 345354.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Quadrana Massimo, Karatzoglou Alexandros, Hidasi Balázs, and Cremonesi Paolo. 2017. Personalizing session-based recommendations with hierarchical recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 130137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Ma Chen, Kang Peng, and Liu Xue. 2019. Hierarchical gating networks for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 825833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Huang Chao, Wu Xian, Zhang Xuchao, Zhang Chuxu, Zhao Jiashu, Yin Dawei, and Chawla Nitesh V.. 2019. Online purchase prediction via multi-scale modeling of behavior dynamics. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 26132622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Lukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. nips.cc, 59986008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Sun Fei, Liu Jun, Wu Jian, Pei Changhua, Lin Xiao, Ou Wenwu, and Jiang Peng. 2019. BERT4Rec: Sequential recommendation with bidirectional encoder representations from Transformer. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 14411450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Wu Qitian, Gao Yirui, Gao Xiaofeng, Weng Paul, and Chen Guihai. 2019. Dual sequential prediction models linking sequential recommendation and information dissemination. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 447457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. [38] Huang Xiaowen, Qian Shengsheng, Fang Quan, Sang Jitao, and Xu Changsheng. 2018. CSAN: Contextual self-attention network for user sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 447455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Qin Jiarui, Ren Kan, Fang Yuchen, Zhang Weinan, and Yu Yong. 2020. Sequential recommendation with dual side neighbor-based collaborative relation modeling. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 465473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Huang Liwei, Ma Yutao, Liu Yanbo, and He Keqing. 2021. DAN-SNR: A deep attentive network for social-aware next point-of-interest recommendation. ACM Trans. Internet Techn. 21, 1 (2021), 2:1–2:27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Ren Ruiyang, Liu Zhaoyang, Li Yaliang, Zhao Wayne Xin, Wang Hui, Ding Bolin, and Wen Ji-Rong. 2020. Sequential recommendation with self-attentive multi-adversarial network. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 8998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Zhou Kun, Wang Hui, Zhao Wayne Xin, Zhu Yutao, Wang Sirui, Zhang Fuzheng, Wang Zhongyuan, and Wen Ji-Rong. 2020. S3-Rec: Self-supervised learning for sequential recommendation with mutual information maximization. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 18931902.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Xia Xin, Yin Hongzhi, Yu Junliang, Wang Qinyong, Cui Lizhen, and Zhang Xiangliang. 2021. Self-supervised hypergraph convolutional networks for session-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 45034511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Wang Jianling, Ding Kaize, Hong Liangjie, Liu Huan, and Caverlee James. 2020. Next-item recommendation with sequential hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 11011110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Feng Yifan, You Haoxuan, Zhang Zizhao, Ji Rongrong, and Gao Yue. 2019. Hypergraph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 35583565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Yadati Naganand, Nimishakavi Madhav, Yadav Prateek, Nitin Vikram, Louis Anand, and Talukdar Partha P.. 2019. HyperGCN: A new method for training graph convolutional networks on hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. nips.cc, 15091520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Ji Yugang, Yin Mingyang, Fang Yuan, Yang Hongxia, Wang Xiangwei, Jia Tianrui, and Shi Chuan. 2020. Temporal heterogeneous interaction graph embedding for next-item recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2020 European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, Part III, 314329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Hamilton William L., Ying Zhitao, and Leskovec Jure. 2017. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. nips.cc, 10241034.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Cheng Heng-Tze, Koc Levent, Harmsen Jeremiah, Shaked Tal, Chandra Tushar, Aradhye Hrishi, Anderson Glen, Corrado Greg, Chai Wei, Ispir Mustafa, Anil Rohan, Haque Zakaria, Hong Lichan, Jain Vihan, Liu Xiaobing, and Shah Hemal. 2016. Wide & deep learning for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems. ACM, 710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. [50] Xu Da, Ruan Chuanwei, Körpeoglu Evren, Kumar Sushant, and Achan Kannan. 2020. Inductive representation learning on temporal graphs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJeW1yHYwH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Zhou Chang, Bai Jinze, Song Junshuai, Liu Xiaofei, Zhao Zhengchao, Chen Xiusi, and Gao Jun. 2018. ATRank: An attention-based user behavior modeling framework for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 45644571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Xu Keyulu, Hu Weihua, Leskovec Jure, and Jegelka Stefanie. 2019. How powerful are graph neural networks? In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Representations. Retrieved from https://openreview.net/forum?id=ryGs6iA5Km.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. [53] He Xiangnan, Liao Lizi, Zhang Hanwang, Nie Liqiang, Hu Xia, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 173182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Kingma Diederik P. and Ba Jimmy. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] He Ruining and McAuley Julian J.. 2016. Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 507517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Ni Jianmo, Li Jiacheng, and McAuley Julian J.. 2019. Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fine-grained aspects. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 188197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. [57] Rendle Steffen, Freudenthaler Christoph, Gantner Zeno, and Schmidt-Thieme Lars. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, 452461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Hidasi Balázs, Karatzoglou Alexandros, Baltrunas Linas, and Tikk Domonkos. 2015. Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks. arXiv:1511.06939. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06939.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Devlin Jacob, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, and Toutanova Kristina. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics 41714186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] Li Xiaohan, Zhang Mengqi, Wu Shu, Liu Zheng, Wang Liang, and Yu Philip S.. 2020. Dynamic graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE Computer Society, 322331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Zhou Jie, Cui Ganqu, Hu Shengding, Zhang Zhengyan, Yang Cheng, Liu Zhiyuan, Wang Lifeng, Li Changcheng, and Sun Maosong. 2020. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI Open 1, (2020), 5781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Hadsell Raia, Chopra Sumit, and LeCun Yann. 2006. Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, Volume 2, 17351742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Qian Tieyun, Liang Yile, Li Qing, and Xiong Hui. 2020. Attribute graph neural networks for strict cold start recommendation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., (2020). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.3038234Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Li Xin, Han Dongcheng, He Jing, Liao Lejian, and Wang Mingzhong. 2019. Next and next new POI recommendation via latent behavior pattern inference. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 37, 4 (2019), 46:1–46:28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. [65] Dai Jiao, Li Mingming, Hu Songlin, and Han Jizhong. 2018. A hybrid model based on the rating bias and textual bias for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer, Part II, 203214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. [66] Wang Xiaojie, Zhang Rui, Sun Yu, and Qi Jianzhong. 2021. Combating selection biases in recommender systems with a few unbiased ratings. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 427435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Krichene Walid and Rendle Steffen. 2020. On sampled metrics for item recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 17481757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. [68] Chen Ting, Kornblith Simon, Norouzi Mohammad, and Hinton Geoffrey E.. 2020. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 15971607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. [69] He Kaiming, Fan Haoqi, Wu Yuxin, Xie Saining, and Girshick Ross B.. 2020. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 97269735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] Chen Hanhua, Jin Hai, and Wu Shaoliang. 2016. Minimizing inter-server communications by exploiting self-similarity in online social networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 27, 4 (2016), 11161130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Position-Enhanced and Time-aware Graph Convolutional Network for Sequential Recommendations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 41, Issue 1
      January 2023
      759 pages
      ISSN:1046-8188
      EISSN:1558-2868
      DOI:10.1145/3570137
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 January 2023
      • Online AM: 4 April 2022
      • Accepted: 13 January 2022
      • Received: 16 June 2021
      Published in tois Volume 41, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format