skip to main content
10.1145/3508397.3564841acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmedesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

A Multiple-Path Routing Model for Quality of Service in Software Defined Networking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things (IoT) has recently emerged as a new family of technologies that allow a great number of things to be connected over heterogeneous networks. Conventional networks, however, face a technological barrier in efficiently handling such a large number of devices. The approach based on software-defined networks (SDNs), with its speed and flexibility, has recently been introduced into IoT area to potentially achieve scalability and adaptability, resulting in the SDN-IoT, a unique IoT design. In this work, we describe a new multiple-path routing model for the SDN-IoT. This model consists of two components: 1) a congested source path discovery technique; 2) a multi-path selection method taking into account route similarity and priority. In this paper we first describe the SDN based Quality of Service and highlight the unique features of this routing technique, then report on the performance evaluation of such system, which achieves an approximate 17% decrease in packet loss ratio over the existing approaches.

References

  1. Miloud Bagaa, Diego Leonel Cadette Dutra, Tarik Taleb, and Konstantinos Samdanis. 2020. On SDN-driven network optimization and QoS aware routing using multiple paths. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 19, 7 (2020), 4700--4714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hilmi E Egilmez, S Tahsin Dane, K Tolga Bagci, and A Murat Tekalp. 2012. OpenQoS: An OpenFlow controller design for multimedia delivery with end-to-end Quality of Service over Software-Defined Networks. In Proceedings of the 2012 Asia Pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hilmi E Egilmez and A Murat Tekalp. 2014. Distributed QoS architectures for multimedia streaming over software defined networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 16, 6 (2014), 1597--1609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ketema Adere Gemeda, Gabriele Gianini, and Mulugeta Libsie. 2015. The effect of node selfishness on the performance of WSN cluster-based routing algorithms. In AFRICON 2015. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ketema Adere Gemeda, Gabriele Gianini, and Mulugeta Libsie. 2017. Collaborative packets forwarding to extend lifetime of multi-authority wireless sensor networks. In 2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC). IEEE, 513--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Xiongfei Geng, Yongcai Wang, Haoran Feng, and Lu Zhang. 2017. Lanepost: Lane-based optimal routing protocol for delay-tolerant maritime networks. China Communications 14, 2 (2017), 65--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gabriele Gianini and Ernesto Damiani. 2013. The cover time of neighbor-avoiding gossiping on geometric random networks. In 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST). IEEE, 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Xuancheng Guo, Hui Lin, Zhiyang Li, and Min Peng. 2019. Deep-reinforcement-learning-based QoS-aware secure routing for SDN-IoT. IEEE Internet of things journal 7, 7 (2019), 6242--6251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Amin Hodaei and Shahram Babaie. 2021. A Survey on Traffic Management in Software-Defined Networks: Challenges, Effective Approaches, and Potential Measures. Wireless Personal Communications 118, 2 (2021), 1507--1534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Abeer AZ Ibrahim, Fazirulhisyam Hashim, Aduwati Sali, Nor K Noordin, and Saber ME Fadul. 2022. A Multi-Objective Routing Mechanism for Energy Management Optimization in SDN Multi-Control Architecture. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 20312--20327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nazrul Islam, Habibur Rahman, and Mostofa Kamal Nasir. 2021. A Comprehensive Analysis of QoS in Wired and Wireless SDN Based on Mobile IP. International Journal of Computer Network & Information Security 13, 5 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Murat Karakus and Arjan Durresi. 2017. Quality of service (QoS) in software defined networking (SDN): A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 80 (2017), 200--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dawit Kifle, Gabriele Gianini, and Mulugeta Libsie. 2015. Improving gossiping performance by means of local topology information. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management of computational and collective intElligence in Digital EcoSystems. 142--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dawit Kifle, Gabriele Gianini, and Mulugeta Libsie. 2018. Local topology aware probabilistic routing. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks. 70--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dawit Kifle, Gabriele Gianini, and Mulugeta Libsie. 2019. Improving Probabilistic Flooding Using Topological Indexes. In 2019 15th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS). IEEE, 376--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Guangyu Li, Lila Boukhatem, and Jinsong Wu. 2016. Adaptive quality-of-service-based routing for vehicular ad hoc networks with ant colony optimization. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 66, 4 (2016), 3249--3264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gaolei Li, Mianxiong Dong, Kaoru Ota, Jun Wu, Jianhua Li, and Tianpeng Ye. 2016. Deep packet inspection based application-aware traffic control for software defined networks. In 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Shih-Chun Lin, Ian F Akyildiz, Pu Wang, and Min Luo. 2016. QoS-aware adaptive routing in multi-layer hierarchical software defined networks: A reinforcement learning approach. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC). IEEE, 25--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mohammed Amine Merzoug, Ahmed Mostefaoui, Gabriele Gianini, and Ernesto Damiani. 2021. Smart connected parking lots based on secured multimedia IoT devices. Computing 103, 6 (2021), 1143--1164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Poongovan Ponnavaikko, Sarah Kate Wilson, Milica Stojanovic, JoAnne Holliday, and Kamal Yassin. 2017. Delay-constrained energy optimization in high-latency sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 17, 13 (2017), 4287--4298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Madhukrishna Priyadarsini and Padmalochan Bera. 2021. Software defined networking architecture, traffic management, security, and placement: A survey. Computer Networks 192 (2021), 108047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Zhaogang Shu, Jiafu Wan, Jiaxiang Lin, Shiyong Wang, Di Li, Seungmin Rho, and Changcai Yang. 2016. Traffic engineering in software-defined networking: Measurement and management. IEEE access 4 (2016), 3246--3256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C Shyamala, M Geetha Priya, and KA Devi. 2020. Cross layer qos guaranteed fault tolerance for data transmission in mobile wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications 114, 3 (2020), 2199--2214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Balazs Sonkoly, András Gulyás, Felicián Németh, János Czentye, Krisztián Kurucz, Barnabás Novák, and Gábor Vaszkun. 2012. On qos support to ofelia and openflow. In 2012 European Workshop on Software Defined Networking. IEEE, 109--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Weifeng Sun, Zun Wang, and Guanghao Zhang. 2021. A QoS-guaranteed intelligent routing mechanism in software-defined networks. Computer Networks 185 (2021), 107709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Pu Wang, Shih-Chun Lin, and Min Luo. 2016. A framework for QoS-aware traffic classification using semi-supervised machine learning in SDNs. In 2016 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC). IEEE, 760--765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Yu Zhang and Sergei Gorlatch. 2021. Optimizing Energy Efficiency of QoS-Based Routing in Software-Defined Networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks. 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Multiple-Path Routing Model for Quality of Service in Software Defined Networking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MEDES '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems
      October 2022
      172 pages
      ISBN:9781450392198
      DOI:10.1145/3508397

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 December 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate267of682submissions,39%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader