skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3502046acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Meeting Users Where They Are: User-centered Design of an Automated Text Messaging Tool to Support the Mental Health of Young Adults

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Young adults have high rates of mental health conditions, but most do not want or cannot access formal treatment. We therefore recruited young adults with depression or anxiety symptoms to co-design a digital tool for self-managing their mental health concerns. Through study activities—consisting of an online discussion group and a series of design workshops—participants highlighted the importance of easy-to-use digital tools that allow them to exercise independence in their self-management. They described ways that an automated messaging tool might benefit them by: facilitating experimentation with diverse concepts and experiences; allowing variable depth of engagement based on preferences, availability, and mood; and collecting feedback to personalize the tool. While participants wanted to feel supported by an automated tool, they cautioned against incorporating an overtly human-like motivational tone. We discuss ways to apply these findings to improve the design and dissemination of digital mental health tools for young adults.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Alaa A Abd-Alrazaq, Mohannad Alajlani, Ali Abdallah Alalwan, Bridgette M Bewick, Peter Gardner, and Mowafa Househ. 2019. An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 132 (2019), 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103978Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Melinda R Achilles, Melissa Anderson, Sophie H Li, Mirjana Subotic-Kerry, Belinda Parker, and Bridianne O’Dea. 2020. Adherence to e-mental health among youth: Considerations for intervention development and research design. DIGITAL HEALTH 6(2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620926064 PMID: 32547775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Adrian Aguilera and Clara Berridge. 2014. Qualitative Feedback From a Text Messaging Intervention for Depression: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Cultural Differences. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2, 4:e46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Adrian Aguilera, Caroline A Figueroa, Rosa Hernandez-Ramos, Urmimala Sarkar, Anupama Cemballi, Laura Gomez-Pathak, Jose Miramontes, Elad Yom-Tov, Bibhas Chakraborty, Xiaoxi Yan, Jing Xu, Arghavan Modiri, Jai Aggarwal, Joseph Jay Williams, and Courtney R Lyles. 2020. mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study. BMJ Open 10, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nazanin Andalibi and Madison K Flood. 2021. Considerations in designing digital peer support for mental health: Interview study among users of a digital support system (Buddy Project). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/21819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gerhard Andersson, Pim Cuijpers, Per Carlbring, Heleen Riper, and Erik Hedman. 2014. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 13, 3 (2014), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bijan Aryana and Liz Brewster. 2020. Design for mobile mental health: Exploring the informed participation approach. Health Informatics Journal 26, 2 (2020), 1208–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219873540 PMID: 31566470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Eleanor Bailey, Jo Robinson, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Maja Nedeljkovic, Lee Valentine, Sarah Bendall, Simon D’Alfonso, Tamsyn Gilbertson, Ben McKechnie, and Simon Rice. 2021. Moderated online social therapy for young people With active suicidal ideation: Qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 23, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/24260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shannon KT Bailey, Bradford L Schroeder, Daphne E Whitmer, and Valerie K Sims. 2016. Perceptions of mobile instant messaging apps are comparable to texting for young adults in the United States. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 60. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1235–1239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Philip J Batterham and Alison L Calear. 2017. Preferences for Internet-based mental health interventions in an adult online sample: Findings from an online community survey. JMIR Ment Health 4, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Amit Baumel, Frederick Muench, Stav Edan, and John M Kane. 2019. Objective user engagement with mental health apps: Systematic search and panel-based usage analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 9 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Aislinn D Bergin, Elvira Perez Vallejos, E Bethan Davies, David Daley, Tamsin Ford, Gordon Harold, Sarah Hetrick, Megan Kidner, Yunfei Long, Sally Merry, 2020. Preventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research.npj Digital Medicine 3(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00339-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Arpita Bhattacharya, Calvin Liang, Emily Y Zeng, Kanishk Shukla, Miguel ER Wong, Sean A Munson, and Julie A Kientz. 2019. Engaging teenagers in asynchronous online groups to design for stress management. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. Association of Computing Machinery, 26–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Timothy Bickmore and Justine Cassell. 2001. Relational agents: A model and implementation of building user trust. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Timothy Bickmore and Amanda Gruber. 2010. Relational agents in clinical psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 18, 2 (2010), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673221003707538 PMID: 20235777.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Timothy W. Bickmore, Suzanne E. Mitchell, Brian W. Jack, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, Laura M. Pfeifer, and Julie O’Donnell. 2010. Response to a relational agent by hospital patients with depressive symptoms. Interacting with Computers 22, 4 (2010), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Christopher Burton, Aurora Szentagotai Tatar, Brian McKinstry, Colin Matheson, Silviu Matu, Ramona Moldovan, Michele Macnab, Elaine Farrow, Daniel David, Claudia Pagliari, 2016. Pilot randomised controlled trial of Help4Mood, an embodied virtual agent-based system to support treatment of depression. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 22, 6 (2016), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15609793 PMID: 26453910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rafael A. Calvo, Dorian Peters, Daniel Johnson, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. Autonomy in technology design. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2560468Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Andrew D. Carlo, Reza Hosseini Ghomi, Brenna N. Renn, and Patricia A. Areán. 2019. By the numbers: Ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications.npj Digital Medicine 2(2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0129-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, Y. Kim, and U. Kaplan. 2003. Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 1(2003), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Leon Ciechanowski, Aleksandra Przegalinska, Mikolaj Magnuski, and Peter Gloor. 2019. In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems 92 (2019), 539–548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2014. Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Springer, 1947–1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marco Colizzi, Antonio Lasalvia, and Mirella Ruggeri. 2020. Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: Is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care?International Journal of Mental Health Systems 14, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mark É Czeisler, Rashon I Lane, Emiko Petrosky, Joshua F Wiley, Aleta Christensen, Rashid Njai, Matthew D Weaver, Rebecca Robbins, Elise R Facer-Childs, Laura K Barger, 2020. Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 69, 32 (06 2020), 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nediyana Daskalova, Jina Yoon, Yibing Wang, Cintia Araujo, Guillermo Beltran, Nicole Nugent, John McGeary, Joseph Jay Williams, and Jeff Huang. 2020. SleepBandits: Guided flexible self-experiments for sleep. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376584Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Maeve Duggan. 2016. Cell phone activities. Pew Research Center Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Christopher G. Fairburn and Vikram Patel. 2017. The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behaviour Research and Therapy 88 (2017), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kathleen K. Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, and Molly Vierhile. 2017. Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health 4, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Russell Fulmer, Angela Joerin, Breanna Gentile, Lysanne Lakerink, and Michiel Rauws. 2018. Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health 5, 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sandra Garrido, Chris Millington, Daniel Cheers, Katherine Boydell, Emery Schubert, Tanya Meade, and Quang Vinh Nguyen. 2019. What works and what doesn’t work? A systematic review of digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in young people. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Asma Ghandeharioun, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski, and Kael Rowan. 2019. Towards understanding emotional intelligence for behavior change chatbots. In 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2019.8925433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jonathan Gratch, Gale M. Lucas, Aisha Aisha King, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2014. It’s only a computer: The impact of human-agent interaction in clinical interviews. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (Paris, France) (AAMAS ’14). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 85–92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Amelia Gulliver, Kathleen M. Griffiths, and Helen Christensen. 2010. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: A systematic review.BMC Psychiatry 10(2010), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Sarah J. Hardcastle, Michelle Fortier, Nicola Blake, and Martin S. Hagger. 2017. Identifying content-based and relational techniques to change behaviour in motivational interviewing. Health Psychology Review 11, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1190659 PMID: 27189713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Frank Iorfino, Shane P. Cross, Tracey Davenport, Joanne S. Carpenter, Elizabeth Scott, Sagit Shiran, and Ian B. Hickie. 2019. A digital platform designed for youth mental health services to deliver personalized and measurement-based care. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00595Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Arne Jansen, Maarten Van Mechelen, and Karin Slegers. 2017. Personas and behavioral theories: A case study using self-determination theory to construct overweight personas. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2127–2136. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Scott W. Kadera, Michael J. Lambert, and Alison A. Andrews. 1996. How much therapy is really enough?: A session-by-session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 5, 2 (1996), 132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Luther G. Kalb, Emma K. Stapp, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Calliope Holingue, Amy Keefer, and Anne Riley. 2019. Trends in psychiatric emergency department visits among youth and young adults in the US. Pediatrics 143, 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jin Kang and Lewen Wei. 2020. Enter your dinner now! Uncovering persuasive message attributes in tracking reminders that motivate logging. In Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Atlanta, GA, USA) (PervasiveHealth ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/3421937.3422014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sylvia Kauer, Kerrie Buhagiar, and Lena Sanci. 2017. Facilitating mental health help seeking in young adults: the underlying theory and development of an online navigation tool. Advances in Mental Health 15, 1 (2017), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2016.1237856Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Sylvia D. Kauer, Kerrie Buhagiar, Victoria Blake, Sue Cotton, and Lena Sanci. 2017. Facilitating mental health help-seeking by young adults with a dedicated online program: A feasibility study of Link. BMJ Open 7, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sylvia D. Kauer, Cheryl Mangan, and Lena Sanci. 2014. Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16, 3 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Ronald C. Kessler, Patricia Berglund, Olga Demler, Robert Jin, Kathleen R. Merikangas, and Ellen E. Walters. 2005. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 6 (2005), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Predrag Klasnja, Eric B Hekler, Saul Shiffman, Audrey Boruvka, Daniel Almirall, Ambuj Tewari, and Susan A Murphy. 2015. Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychology 34(Suppl) (2015), 1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000305Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Predrag Klasnja, Shawna Smith, Nicholas J Seewald, Andy Lee, Kelly Hall, Brook Luers, Eric B Hekler, and Susan A Murphy. 2018. Efficacy of Contextually Tailored Suggestions for Physical Activity: A Micro-randomized optimization trial of HeartSteps. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 53, 6 (09 2018), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Rafal Kocielnik and Gary Hsieh. 2017. Send me a different message: Utilizing cognitive space to create engaging message triggers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2193–2207. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Rachel Kornfield, David C. Mohr, Jonah Meyerhoff, Rachel Ranney, Joseph J. Williams, Emily G. Lattie, and Madhu Reddy. In press. Involving crowdworkers with lived experience in content-development for digital mental health tools: Lessons learned from crowdsourcing mental health Messages. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Rachel Kornfield, Renwen Zhang, Jennifer Nicholas, Stephen M. Schueller, Scott A. Cambo, David C. Mohr, and Madhu Reddy. 2020. ”Energy is a finite resource”: Designing technology to support individuals across fluctuating symptoms of depression. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Paul Krebs, James O. Prochaska, and Joseph S. Rossi. 2010. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive medicine 51, 3-4 (2010), 214–221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Kira Kretzschmar, Holly Tyroll, Gabriela Pavarini, Arianna Manzini, Ilina Singh, and NeurOx Young People’s Advisory Group. 2019. Can your phone be your therapist? Young people’s ethical perspectives on the Use of fully automated conversational agents (Chatbots) in mental health support. Biomedical Informatics Insights 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1178222619829083 PMID: 30858710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, and Janet B. W. Williams. 2001. The PHQ-9. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16 (2001), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Mary J. Kwasny, Stephen M. Schueller, Emily Lattie, Elizabeth L. Gray, and David C. Mohr. 2019. Exploring the use of multiple mental health apps within a platform: Secondary analysis of the IntelliCare field trial. JMIR Mental Health 6, 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/11572Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Mark Erik Larsen, Fiona Shand, Kirsten Morley, Philip J. Batterham, Katherine Petrie, Bill Reda, Sofian Berrouiguet, Paul S. Haber, Gregory Carter, and Helen Christensen. 2017. A mobile text message intervention to reduce repeat suicidal episodes: Design and development of reconnecting after a suicide attempt (RAFT). JMIR Mental Health 4, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7500Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Emily G. Lattie, Elizabeth C. Adkins, Nathan Winquist, Colleen Stiles-Shields, Q. Eileen Wafford, and Andrea K. Graham. 2019. Digital mental health interventions for depression, anxiety, and enhancement of psychological well-being among college students: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/12869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Emily G. Lattie, Rachel Kornfield, Kathryn E. Ringland, Renwen Zhang, Nathan Winquist, and Madhu Reddy. 2020. Designing mental health technologies that support the social ecosystem of college students. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Reeva Lederman, John Gleeson, Greg Wadley, Simon D’alfonso, Simon Rice, Olga Santesteban-Echarri, and Mario Alvarez-Jimenez. 2019. Support for carers of young people with mental illness: Design and trial of a technology-mediated therapy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 1(2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3301421Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Reeva Lederman, Greg Wadley, John Gleeson, Sarah Bendall, and Mario Álvarez-Jiménez. 2014. Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 21, 1(2014), 1–26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Jisoo Lee, Erin Walker, Winslow Burleson, Matthew Kay, Matthew Buman, and Eric B. Hekler. 2017. Self-experimentation for behavior change: Design and formative evaluation of two approaches. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6837–6849. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Patricia K. Leebens and Edwin D. Williamson. 2017. Developmental psychopathology: Risk and resilience in the transition to young adulthood. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 26, 2(2017), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Sean Legler, Christopher M. Celano, Adela Amador, Austen Novis, Senan Ebrahim, and Jeff C. Huffman. 2018. Development and theoretical approach to an adaptive text message program to promote well-being and health behaviors in primary care patients.Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders 20, 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.18br02353Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Susanna Lehtimaki, Jana Martic, Brian Wahl, Katherine T. Foster, Nina Schwalbe, 2021. Evidence on digital mental health interventions for adolescents and young people: Systematic overview. JMIR Mental Health 8, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/25847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Michael E Levin, Krista Stocke, Benjamin Pierce, and Crissa Levin. 2018. Do college students use online self-help? A survey of intentions and use of mental health resources. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy 32, 3 (2018), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2017.1366283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Shaun Liverpool, Catarina Pinheiro Mota, Célia M. D. Sales, Anja Čuš, Sara Carletto, Camellia Hancheva, Sónia Sousa, Sonia Conejo Cerón, Patricia Moreno-Peral, Giada Pietrabissa, 2020. Engaging children and young people in digital mental health interventions: systematic review of modes of delivery, facilitators, and barriers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, 6 (2020), e16317. https://doi.org/10.2196/16317Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Deborah Lupton. 2021. Young people’s use of digital health technologies in the global north: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, 1 (2021), e18286. https://doi.org/10.2196/18286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Aaron R. Lyon, Sean A. Munson, Brenna N. Renn, David C. Atkins, Michael D. Pullmann, Emily Friedman, and Patricia A. Areán. 2019. Use of human-centered design to improve implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies in low-resource communities: Protocol for studies applying a framework to assess usability. JMIR Research Protocols 8, 10 (2019), e14990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Haley MacLeod, Ben Jelen, Annu Prabhakar, Lora Oehlberg, Katie Siek, and Kay Connelly. 2016. Asynchronous remote communities (ARC) for researching distributed populations. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Cancun, Mexico) (PervasiveHealth ’16). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels, BEL. https://doi.org/10.5555/3021319.3021320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Juan F. Maestre, Haley MacLeod, Ciabhan L. Connelly, Julia C. Dunbar, Jordan Beck, Katie A. Siek, and Patrick C. Shih. 2018. Defining through expansion: conducting asynchronous remote communities (ARC) research with stigmatized groups. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174131Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Frank T. Materia and Joshua M. Smyth. 2021. Acceptability of intervention design factors in mHealth intervention research: Experimental factorial study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9, 7 (2021), e23303. https://doi.org/10.2196/23303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Elinore F. McCance-Katz. 2019. The national survey on drug use and health: 2018. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/nsduh-ppt-09-2018.pdf. Accessed May 7 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Nisha Mehta, Tim Croudace, and Dame Sally C. Davies. 2015. Public mental health: Evidenced-based priorities. The Lancet 385, 9976 (2015), 1472–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61400-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Jennifer Melcher, Ryan Hays, and John Torous. 2020. Digital phenotyping for mental health of college students: a clinical review. Evidence-Based Mental Health 23, 4 (2020), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300180Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. David C. Mohr, Kathryn Noth Tomasino, Emily G. Lattie, Hannah L. Palac, Mary J. Kwasny, Kenneth Weingardt, Chris J. Karr, Susan M. Kaiser, Rebecca C. Rossom, Leland R. Bardsley, 2017. IntelliCare: an eclectic, skills-based app suite for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, 1 (2017), e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Megan A. Moreno, Lauren A. Jelenchick, Katie G. Egan, Elizabeth Cox, Henry Young, Kerry E. Gannon, and Tara Becker. 2011. Feeling bad on Facebook: Depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depression and anxiety 28, 6 (2011), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Robert R. Morris, Kareem Kouddous, Rohan Kshirsagar, and Stephen M. Schueller. 2018. Towards an artificially empathic conversational agent for mental health applications: system design and user perceptions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, 6 (2018), e10148. https://doi.org/10.2196/10148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Jonathan Mumm and Bilge Mutlu. 2011. Designing motivational agents: The role of praise, social comparison, and embodiment in computer feedback. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 5 (2011), 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. J. Michael Murphy, Theresa Nguyen, Cara Lucke, Cindy Chiang, Natalie Plasencia, and Michael Jellinek. 2018. Adolescent self-screening for mental health problems; demonstration of an internet-based approach. Academic Pediatrics 18, 1 (2018), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.08.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. John A. Naslund, Kelly A. Aschbrenner, Lisa A. Marsch, and S. J. Bartels. 2016. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 25, 2 (2016), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1 (2000), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Frank Newport. 2014. The new era of communication among Americans. Gallup.com 11, 10 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Ada Ng, Rachel Kornfield, Stephen M. Schueller, Alyson K. Zalta, Michael Brennan, and Madhu Reddy. 2019. Provider perspectives on integrating sensor-captured patient-generated data in mental health care. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359217Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Mariesa Nicholas, Penny Hagen, Kitty Rahilly, and Nathalie Swainston. 2012. Using participatory design methods to engage the uninterested. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume 2. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Sarah S. Nouri, Patricia Avila-Garcia, Anupama Gunshekar Cemballi, Urmimala Sarkar, Adrian Aguilera, and Courtney Rees Lyles. 2019. Assessing mobile phone digital literacy and engagement in user-centered design in a diverse, safety-net population: mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7, 8 (2019), e14250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-care technologies in HCI: Trends, tensions, and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 6(2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Kathleen O’Leary, Stephen M. Schueller, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2018. “Suddenly, we got to become therapists for each other”: Designing peer support chats for mental health. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association of Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Steven J. Ondersma, Sara K Chase, Dace S. Svikis, and Charles R. Schuster. 2005. Computer-based brief motivational intervention for perinatal drug use. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 28, 4 (2005), 305–312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Claudia Pagliari. 2007. Design and evaluation in eHealth: challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9, 2 (2007), e614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Pablo Paredes, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Mary Czerwinski, Asta Roseway, Kael Rowan, and Javier Hernandez. 2014. PopTherapy: Coping with stress through pop-culture. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 109–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Tomáš Paus, Matcheri Keshavan, and Jay N. Giedd. 2008. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 (2008), 947–957. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. Jennifer H. Pfeifer and Nicholas B. Allen. 2020. Puberty initiates cascading relationships between neurodevelopmental, social, and internalizing processes across adolescence. Biological Psychiatry(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Pierre Philip, Lucile Dupuy, Marc Auriacombe, Fushia Serre, Etienne de Sevin, Alain Sauteraud, and Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi. 2020. Trust and acceptance of a virtual psychiatric interview between embodied conversational agents and outpatients. NPJ Digital Medicine 3, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0213-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Rosalind W. Picard and Karen K. Liu. 2007. Relative subjective count and assessment of interruptive technologies applied to mobile monitoring of stress. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 4 (2007), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Anthony R. Pisani, Peter A. Wyman, Kunali Gurditta, Karen Schmeelk-Cone, Carolyn L. Anderson, and Emily Judd. 2018. Mobile phone intervention to reduce youth suicide in rural communities: field test. JMIR Mental Health 5, 2 (2018), e10425. https://doi.org/10.2196/10425Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Erika S. Poole. 2013. HCI and mobile health interventions: how human–computer interaction can contribute to successful mobile health interventions. Translational Behavioral Medicine 3, 4 (2013), 402–405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Claudette Pretorius, Derek Chambers, and David Coyle. 2019. Young people’s online help-seeking and mental health difficulties: Systematic narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 11 (2019), e13873. https://doi.org/10.2196/13873Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Claudette Pretorius, Darragh McCashin, Naoise Kavanagh, and David Coyle. 2020. Searching for mental health: A mixed-methods study of young people’s online help-seeking. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376328Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Mashfiqui Rabbi, Min Hane Aung, Mi Zhang, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. MyBehavior: Automatic personalized health feedback from user behaviors and preferences using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805840Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Mashfiqui Rabbi, Meredith Philyaw-Kotov, Jinseok Lee, Anthony Mansour, Laura Dent, Xiaolei Wang, Rebecca Cunningham, Erin Bonar, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Predrag Klasnja, 2017. SARA: A mobile app to engage users in health data collection. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 781–789.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Ana Radovic, Alexandra L. DeMand, Theresa Gmelin, Bradley D. Stein, and Elizabeth Miller. 2017. SOVA: Design of a stakeholder informed social media website for depressed adolescents and their parents. Journal of Technology in Human Services 35, 3 (2017), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2017.1347552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Stephen A. Rains and Kevin B. Wright. 2016. Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-art review and agenda for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association 40, 1(2016), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735260Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Megan L Ranney, Esther K Choo, Rebecca M Cunningham, Anthony Spirito, Margaret Thorsen, Michael J Mello, and Kathleen Morrow. 2014. Acceptability, language, and structure of text message-based behavioral interventions for high-risk adolescent females: a qualitative study. Journal of Adolescent Health 55, 1 (2014), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  102. Megan L. Ranney, Joshua R. Freeman, Gerianne Connell, Anthony Spirito, Edward Boyer, Maureen Walton, Kate Morrow Guthrie, and Rebecca M. Cunningham. 2016. A depression prevention intervention for adolescents in the emergency department. Journal of Adolescent Health 59, 4 (2016), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.04.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Megan L. Ranney, Anthony R. Pisani, and Lauren S. Chernick. 2018. The Role of Texting in Addressing Mental Health. In Technology and Adolescent Mental Health. Springer, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69638-6_15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Brenna N. Renn, Theresa J. Hoeft, Heather Sophia Lee, Amy M. Bauer, and Patricia A. Areán. 2019. Preference for in-person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of adults in the US. NPJ Digital Medicine 2, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  106. Paula V. Resnik and H. Bruce Lammers. 1985. The influence of self-esteem on cognitive responses to machine-like versus human-like computer feedback. The Journal of Social Psychology 125, 6 (1985), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1985.9713550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Derek Richards. 2011. Prevalence and clinical course of depression: A review. Clinical Psychology Review 31, 7 (2011), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. Brad Ridout and Andrew Campbell. 2018. The use of social networking sites in mental health interventions for young people: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, 12 (2018), e12244. https://doi.org/10.2196/12244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. William T. Riley, Daniel E. Rivera, Audie A. Atienza, Wendy Nilsen, Susannah M. Allison, and Robin Mermelstein. 2011. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?Translational Behavioral Medicine 1, 1 (02 2011), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. Fiona Robards, Melissa Kang, Tim Usherwood, and Lena Sanci. 2018. How marginalized young people access, engage with, and navigate health-care systems in the digital age: systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health 62, 4 (2018), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. C. Robb, W. E. Haley, M. A. Becker, L. A. Polivka, and H.-J. Chwa. 2003. Attitudes towards mental health care in younger and older adults: Similarities and differences. Aging & Mental Health 7, 2 (2003), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360786031000072321 PMID: 12745392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Maaike Roubroeks, Cees Midden, and Jaap Ham. 2009. Does it make a difference who tells you what to do? Exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Claremont, California, USA) (Persuasive ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541970Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Megan L. Ryan, Ian M. Shochet, and Helen M. Stallman. 2010. Universal online interventions might engage psychologically distressed university students who are unlikely to seek formal help. Advances in Mental Health 9, 1 (2010), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.9.1.73Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Hyeyoung Ryu, Soyeon Kim, Dain Kim, Sooan Han, Keeheon Lee, and Younah Kang. 2020. Simple and steady interactions win the healthy mentality: Designing a chatbot service for the elderly. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW(2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Hanneke Scholten and Isabela Granic. 2019. Use of the principles of design thinking to address limitations of digital mental health interventions for youth. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 1 (2019), e11528. https://doi.org/10.2196/11528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Ryan M. Schuetzler, Justin Scott Giboney, G. Mark Grimes, and Jay F. Nunamaker Jr. 2018. The influence of conversational agent embodiment and conversational relevance on socially desirable responding. Decision Support Systems 114 (2018), 94–102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. Richard A. Settersten Jr, Laura Bernardi, Juho Härkönen, Toni C. Antonucci, Pearl A. Dykstra, Jutta Heckhausen, Diana Kuh, Karl Ulrich Mayer, Phyllis Moen, Jeylan T. Mortimer, 2020. Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research 45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine S Cohen, Steven Jacobs, Niklas Elmqvist, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2016. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Marie A. Sillice, Patricia J. Morokoff, Ginette Ferszt, Timothy Bickmore, Beth C. Bock, Ryan Lantini, and Wayne F. Velicer. 2018. Using relational agents to promote exercise and sun protection: Assessment of participants’ experiences with two interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, 2 (2018), e7640. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. Eline S. Smit, Annemiek J. Linn, and Julia C. M. van Weert. 2015. Taking online computer-tailoring forward: The potential of tailoring the message frame and delivery mode of online health behaviour change interventions. European Health Psychologist 17, 1 (2015), 25–31. http://www.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/download/762/pdf_38Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Amalie Søgaard Neilsen and Rhonda L. Wilson. 2019. Combining e-mental health intervention development with human computer interaction (HCI) design to enhance technology-facilitated recovery for people with depression and/or anxiety conditions: an integrative literature review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 28, 1 (2019), 22–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. Robert L. Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet B. W. Williams, and Bernd Löwe. 2006. A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine 166, 10 (2006), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  123. Lee Sproull, Mani Subramani, Sara Kiesler, Janet H. Walker, and Keith Waters. 1996. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction 11, 2 (1996), 97–124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Yi Tong Tan, Imogen C Rehm, Judith L Stevenson, and Alexander De Foe. 2021. Social media peer support groups for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders: Understanding the predictors of negative experiences. Journal of Affective Disorders 281 (2021), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  125. Silke ter Stal, Lean Leonie Kramer, Monique Tabak, Harm op den Akker, and Hermie Hermens. 2020. Design features of embodied conversational agents in eHealth: A literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 138 (2020), 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. Conall Tunney, Patricia Cooney, David Coyle, and Gary O’Reilly. 2017. Comparing young people’s experience of technology-delivered v. face-to-face mindfulness and relaxation: Two-armed qualitative focus group study. The British Journal of Psychiatry 210, 4 (2017), 284–289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Ann P. Turnbull and H. Rutherford Turnbull III. 1985. Developing independence. Journal of Adolescent Health Care 6, 2 (1985), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-0070(85)80035-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. Peter Uhlhaas and John Torous. 2019. Digital tools for youth mental health. NPJ Digital Medicine 2(2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0181-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. Jen Van Tiem, Jane Moeckli, Natalie Suiter, Lindsey Fuhrmeister, Kassi Pham, Lilian Dindo, and Carolyn Turvey. 2021. “A link to the outside:” Patient perspectives on a mobile texting program to improve depression self-management. Patient Education and Counseling 104, 9 (2021), 2154–2158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Annalu Waller, Victoria Franklin, Claudia Pagliari, and Stephen Greene. 2006. Participatory design of a text message scheduling system to support young people with diabetes. Health Informatics Journal 12, 4 (2006), 304–318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  131. Jane C. Willcox, Rosie Dobson, and Robyn Whittaker. 2019. Old-fashioned technology in the era of “Bling”: is there a future for text messaging in health care?Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 12 (2019), e16630. https://doi.org/10.2196/16630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  132. Coralie J. Wilson, Debra J. Rickwood, John A Bushnell, Peter Caputi, and Susan J. Thomas. 2011. The effects of need for autonomy and preference for seeking help from informal sources on emerging adults’ intentions to access mental health services for common mental disorders and suicidal thoughts. Advances in Mental Health 10, 1 (2011), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.2011.10.1.29Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. Hannah Wisniewski, Gang Liu, Philip Henson, Aditya Vaidyam, Narissa Karima Hajratalli, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, and John Torous. 2019. Understanding the quality, effectiveness and attributes of top-rated smartphone health apps. Evidence-Based Mental Health 22, 1 (2019), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2018-300069 arXiv:https://ebmh.bmj.com/content/22/1/4.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  134. Renwen Zhang, Kathryn E. Ringland, Melina Paan, David C. Mohr, and Madhusudhana C. Reddy. 2021. Designing for emotional well-being: Integrating persuasion and customization into mental health technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Meeting Users Where They Are: User-centered Design of an Automated Text Messaging Tool to Support the Mental Health of Young Adults

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2022
      10459 pages
      ISBN:9781450391573
      DOI:10.1145/3491102

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format