skip to main content
10.1145/3477495.3531882acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Addressing Gender-related Performance Disparities in Neural Rankers

Published:07 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

While neural rankers continue to show notable performance improvements over a wide variety of information retrieval tasks, there have been recent studies that show such rankers may intensify certain stereotypical biases. In this paper, we investigate whether neural rankers introduce retrieval effectiveness (performance) disparities over queries related to different genders. We specifically study whether there are significant performance differences between male and female queries when retrieved by neural rankers. Through our empirical study over the MS MARCO collection, we find that such performance disparities are notable and that the performance disparities may be due to the difference between how queries and their relevant judgements are collected and distributed for different gendered queries. More specifically, we observe that male queries are more closely associated with their relevant documents compared to female queries and hence neural rankers are able to more easily learn associations between male queries and their relevant documents. We show that it is possible to systematically balance relevance judgment collections in order to reduce performance disparity between different gendered queries without negatively compromising overall model performance.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

sigir22-1951.mp4

mp4

9.5 MB

References

  1. Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Shirin Seyedsalehi, Morteza Zihayat, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2022. A Light-Weight Strategy for Restraining Gender Biases in Neural Rankers. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 47--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Shirin Seyersalehi, Morteza Zihayat, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2021. On the Orthogonality of Bias and Utility in Ad hoc Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 44rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Morteza Zihayat, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2021. Exploring Gender Biases in Information Retrieval Relevance Judgement Datasets. In Advances in Information Retrieval - 43rd European Conference on IR Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alessandro Fabris, Alberto Purpura, Gianmaria Silvello, and Gian Antonio Susto. 2020. Gender stereotype reinforcement: Measuring the gender bias conveyed by ranking algorithms. Information Processing & Management 57, 6 (2020), 102377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Luyu Gao and Jamie Callan. 2021. Unsupervised corpus aware language model pre-training for dense passage retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05540 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Anja Klasnja, Negar Arabzadeh, Mahbod Mehrvarz, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2022. On the Characteristics of Ranking-based Gender Bias Measures. In WebSci'22 (2022-03--30) (The 14th International ACM Conference on Web Science in 2022 (WebSci'22), 26 -- 29, June, 2022, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Jianfeng Gao, Saurabh Tiwary, Rangan Majumder, and Li Deng. 2016. MS MARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. In CoCo@ NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rodrigo Nogueira and Kyunghyun Cho. 2019. Passage Re-ranking with BERT. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04085 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rodrigo Nogueira, Jimmy Lin, and AI Epistemic. 2019. From doc2query to docTTTTTquery. Online preprint (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Harshith Padigela, Hamed Zamani, and W Bruce Croft. 2019. Investigating the successes and failures of BERT for passage re-ranking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01758 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. CoRR abs/1908.10084 (2019). arXiv:1908.10084 http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Navid Rekabsaz, Simone Kopeinik, and Markus Schedl. 2021. Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation for BERT Rankers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13640 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Navid Rekabsaz and Markus Schedl. 2020. Do Neural Ranking Models Intensify Gender Bias?. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2065--2068.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shirin Seyedsalehi, Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Bhaskar Mitra, Morteza Zihayat, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2022. Bias-aware Fair Neural Ranking for Addressing Stereotypical Gender Biases. In EDBT/ICDT 2022 (2022-01-01).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Addressing Gender-related Performance Disparities in Neural Rankers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '22: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2022
      3569 pages
      ISBN:9781450387323
      DOI:10.1145/3477495

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader