skip to main content
10.1145/3474124.3474150acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic3Conference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fusion Framework for Morphological and Multispectral Textural Features for Identification of Endometrial Tuberculosis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Endometrial Tuberculosis (ETB) is primarily diagnosed in infertile females as a fallout of Female Genital Tuberculosis (FGTB). An effective and fast computational method to diagnose ETB from Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) images is of great importance to the community. The objective of this paper is to obtain an optimal subset of features for an effective and discriminative analysis of TVUS images for identifying ETB. The TVUS images from different medical centers in India have been collected under expert supervision from female patients. Texture and Morphological features effectively capture the observations made by the experts for identifying the problem in hand. Therefore a fusion framework model is proposed where the extracted image features are fused and an optimal subset of features is obtained for identification. Multiresolution transformation of ill-defined TVUS images highlights the directional, multi- scale spectral textural features. Therefore, to obtain discriminatory textural features, images are transformed using Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transformation (NSCT) before feature extraction. Experimental results of the fusion model for classification show significant improvements and prove to be more efficient. The proposed methodology records an F-score of 0.845 with a sensitivity score of 0.818 for the dataset available. A feature reduction of 64.5% is attained for the classification of the dataset after feature selection.

References

  1. World Health Organization: “Global tuberculosis report 2019”, www.who.int/tb/publications/global_reportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sharma, J.B., Dharmendra, S., Agarwal, S., , 2016, “Genital tuberculosis and infertility” Fertility Science and Research,3: 6-18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Djuwantono, T., Permadi, W., Septiani, L. , 2017, “Female genital tuberculosis and infertility: serial cases report in Bandung, Indonesia and literature review”, BMC research notes, 10(1), 1683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Naik N,S, Chandanwale A., Kadam D., Sambarey P.W., DhumalG. , 2021, Detection of genital tuberculosis among women with infertility using best clinical practices in India: An implementation study, Indian Journal of Tuberculosis,68(1), 85-91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. Steifer and M. Lewandowski, “Ultrasound tissue characterization based on the Lempel–Ziv complexity with application to breast lesion classification,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 51, pp. 235–242, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Latha, S., Samiappan, D., & Kumar, R., 2020, “Carotid artery ultrasound image analysis: A review of the literature”, Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part H: journal of engineering in medicine, 234(5), 417-443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Su, Y., Wang, Y., Jiao, J., & Guo, Y., 2011,“Automatic detection and classification of breast tumors in ultrasonic images using texture and morphological features”, the open medical informatics journal, 5(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daoud, M. I., Bdair, T. M., Al-Najar, M., & Alazrai, R., 2016, “A Fusion-Based Approach for Breast Ultrasound Image Classification Using Multiple-ROI Texture and Morphological Analyses”, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2016, 6740956. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6740956Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Daoud MI, Abdel-Rahman S, Bdair TM, Al-Najar MS, Al-Hawari FH, Alazrai R., 2020, “Breast Tumor Classification in Ultrasound Images Using Combined Deep and Handcrafted Features”, Sensors (Basel).; 20(23):6838. doi: 10.3390/s20236838. PMID: 33265900; PMCID: PMC7730057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hsu SM, Kuo WH, Kuo FC, Liao YY, 2019 , “Breast tumor classification using different features of quantitative ultrasound parametric images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg.”, 14(4):623-633. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-01908-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang, X., Qiu, S., & Luo, Q., 2020, Feature-Based Discrimination of Thyroid Cancer on Ultrasound Images. In 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics Technology, pp. 834-839.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Haralick R. M., Shanmugam K., Dinstein I.1973, “Textural Features for Image Classification”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3: 610–621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kumar, D., 2020, “Feature Extraction and Selection of kidney Ultrasound Images Using GLCM and PCA”, Procedia Computer Science, 167: 1722-1731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Brehar, R., Mitrea, D., Nedevschi, S., , 2019, “Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recognition in Ultrasound Images Using Textural Descriptors and Classical Machine Learning”, IEEE 15th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, 491-497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dandan, L., Huanhuan,M.,et al, 2019, “Classification of diffuse liver diseases based on ultrasound images with multimodal features”, IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Dhaygude, P. S., Handore, S. M., 2016, “Feature Extraction of Thyroid Nodule US Images Using GLCM", International Journal of Science and Research, 51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Do, M. N., and Vetterli, M., 2002, “Contourlets: a directional multiresolution image representation”, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing, 1, pp. I-I.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wei, M., Du, Y., Wu, X., Su, Q., Zhu, J., Zheng, L., & Zhuang, J., 2020, “A Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Classification Method via Efficiently Combining Texture and Morphological Features on Ultrasound Images”, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. A. Ardakani, A. Gharbali, and A. Mohammadi, 2015, “Classification of breast tumors using sonographic texture analysis,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 225–231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R. Biswas, A. Nath, and S. Roy, 2016, “Mammogram classification using gray-level co-occurrence matrix for diagnosis of breast cancer,” International Conference on Micro- Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering (ICMETE), pp. 161–166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Abdel-Nasser, J. Melendez, A. Moreno, O. A. Omer, and D. Puig,2017, “Breast tumour classification in ultrasound images using texture analysis and super-resolution methods,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 59, pp. 84–92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. W. Gómez Flores, W. C., A. Pereira, and A. F. C. Infantosi, 2015, “Improving classification performance of breast lesions on ultrasonography,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1125–1136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. V. Menon, P. Raha, S. Kothari, S. Chakraborty, I. Chakrabarti, and R. Karim, 2015, “Automated detection and classification of mass from breast ultrasound images,” 5th National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG), pp. 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Rodríguez-Cristerna, W. Gómez-Flores, and W. C. de Albuquerque Pereira, 2018 “A computer-aided diagnosis system for breast ultrasound based on weighted BI-RADS classes,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 153, pp. 33–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. F. A. González-Luna, J. Hernández-López, and W. Gomez- Flores, 2019 , “A performance evaluation of machine learning techniques for breast ultrasound classification,” ,16th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), pp. 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Garg, V., Sahoo, A., &Saxena, V., 2021, “Enhanced textural analysis for endometrial tuberculosis identification from ultrasound images”, International Journal of Information Technology, 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Telagarapu, P., & Poonguzhali, S., 2014, “Analysis of contourlet texture feature extraction to classify the benign and malignant tumours from breast ultrasound images. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 239-305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wei, M., Wu, X., Zhu, J., , 2019, “Multi-feature Fusion for Ultrasound Breast Image Classification of Benign and Malignant” IEEE 4th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing, 474-478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Da Cunha, A.L., Zhou, J., & Do, M. N., 2006, “The non-subsampled contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications”, IEEE transactions on image processing,15(10), 3089-3101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Chen, Yi-Wei, and Chih-Jen Lin., 2006 "Combining SVMs with various feature selection strategies," Feature extraction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 315-324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IC3-2021: Proceedings of the 2021 Thirteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing
    August 2021
    483 pages
    ISBN:9781450389204
    DOI:10.1145/3474124

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 November 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format