Abstract
Recent advances in technology have brought major breakthroughs in data collection, enabling a large amount of data to be gathered over time and thus generating time series. Mining this data has become an important task for researchers and practitioners in the past few years, including the detection of outliers or anomalies that may represent errors or events of interest. This review aims to provide a structured and comprehensive state-of-the-art on unsupervised outlier detection techniques in the context of time series. To this end, a taxonomy is presented based on the main aspects that characterize an outlier detection technique.
- C. Aggarwal. 2016. Outlier Analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Aguinis, R. K. Gottfredson, and H. Joo. 2013. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organiz. Res. Methods 16, 2 (2013), 270--301.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ahmad, A. Lavin, S. Purdy, and Z. Agha. 2017. Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data. Neurocomputing 262 (2017), 134--147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. N. Akouemo and R. J. Povinelli. 2014. Time series outlier detection and imputation. In Proceedings of the IEEE PES General Meeting—Conference Exposition, 1--5.Google Scholar
- H. N. Akouemo and R. J. Povinelli. 2016. Probabilistic anomaly detection in natural gas time series data. Int. J. Forecast. 32, 3 (2016), 948--956.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. N. Akouemo and R. J. Povinelli. 2017. Data improving in time series using ARX and ANN models. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32, 5 (2017), 3352--3359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Angiulli and F. Fassetti. 2007. Detecting distance-based outliers in streams of data. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’07). ACM, 811--820.Google Scholar
- F. Angiulli and F. Fassetti. 2010. Distance-based outlier queries in data streams: The novel task and algorithms. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 20, 2 (2010), 290--324.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Baragona and F. Battaglia. 2007. Outliers detection in multivariate time series by independent component analysis. Neural Comput. 19, 7 (2007), 1962--1984.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Basu and M. Meckesheimer. 2007. Automatic outlier detection for time series: An application to sensor data. Knowl. Info. Syst. 11, 2 (2007), 137--154.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Beggel, B. X. Kausler, M. Schiegg, M. Pfeiffer, and B. Bischl. 2019. Time series anomaly detection based on shapelet learning. Comput. Stat. 34, 3 (2019), 945--976.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. E. Benkabou, K. Benabdeslem, and B. Canitia. 2018. Unsupervised outlier detection for time series by entropy and dynamic time warping. Knowl. Info. Syst. 54, 2 (2018), 463--486.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Bu, T. W. Leung, A. W. C. Fu, E. Keogh, J. Pei, and S. Meshkin. 2007. Wat: Finding top-k discords in time series database. In Proceedings of the 7th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 449--454.Google Scholar
- H. T. Q. Buu and D. T. Anh. 2011. Time series discord discovery based on iSAX symbolic representation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering. IEEE, 11--18.Google Scholar
- M Čampulová, J. Michálek, P. Mikuška, and D. Bokal. 2018. Nonparametric algorithm for identification of outliers in environmental data. J. Chemom. 32, 5 (2018), 1--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Carreño, I. Inza, and J. A. Lozano. 2020. Analyzing rare event, anomaly, novelty and outlier detection terms under the supervised classification framework. Artific. Intell. Rev. 53, 5 (2020), 3575--3594.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Carrera, B. Rossi, P. Fragneto, and G. Boracchi. 2019. Online anomaly detection for long-term ECG monitoring using wearable devices. Pattern Recogn. 88 (2019), 482--492.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Carrera, B. Rossi, D. Zambon, P. Fragneto, and G. Boracchi. 2016. ECG monitoring in wearable devices by sparse models. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 145--160.Google Scholar
- K. M. Carter and W. W. Streilein. 2012. Probabilistic reasoning for streaming anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP’12), Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--4.Google Scholar
- V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar. 2007. Outlier Detection: A Survey. Technical Report. Technical Report TR 07-017. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar. 2009. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 3 (2009), 1--72.Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar. 2012. Anomaly detection for discrete sequences: A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24, 5 (2012), 823--839.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. M. Chau, B. M. Duc, and D. T. Anh. 2018. Discord discovery in streaming time series based on an improved HOT SAX algorithm. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology. ACM, 24--30.Google Scholar
- C. Chen and D. J. Cook. 2011. Energy outlier detection in smart environments. In Proceedings of the Workshops at the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 9--14.Google Scholar
- C. Chen, D. J. Cook, and A. S. Crandall. 2013. The user side of sustainability: Modeling behavior and energy usage in the home. Pervas. Mobile Comput. 9, 1 (2013), 161--175.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Chen and L. M. Liu. 1993. Joint estimation of model parameters and outlier effects in time series. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88, 421 (1993), 284--297.Google Scholar
- J. Chen, W. Li, A. Lau, J. Cao, and K. Wang. 2010. Automated load curve data cleansing in power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1, 2 (2010), 213--221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Cheng, P. N. Tan, C. Potter, and S. Klooster. 2008. A robust graph-based algorithm for detection and characterization of anomalies in noisy multivariate time series. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’08). IEEE, 349--358.Google Scholar
- H. Cheng, P. N. Tan, C. Potter, and S. Klooster. 2009. Detection and characterization of anomalies in multivariate time series. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 413--424.Google Scholar
- M. C. Dani, F. X. Jollois, M. Nadif, and C. Freixo. 2015. Adaptive threshold for anomaly detection using time series segmentation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP’15). Springer, Cham, 82--89.Google Scholar
- P. Esling and C. Agon. 2012. Time-series data mining. ACM Comput. Surv. 45, 1 (2012), 1--34.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. J. Fox. 1972. Outliers in time series. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 34, 3 (1972), 350--363.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. W. C. Fu, O. T. W. Leung, E. Keogh, and J. Lin. 2006. Finding time series discords based on Haar transform. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA’06). Springer, Berlin, 31--41.Google Scholar
- T. C. Fu. 2011. A review on time series data mining. Eng. Appl. Artific. Intell. 24, 1 (2011), 164--181.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Galeano, D. Peña, and R. S. Tsay. 2006. Outlier detection in multivariate time series by projection pursuit. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101, 474 (2006), 654--669.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Gama, I. Zliobaite, A. Bifet, M. Pechenizkiy, and A. Bouchachia. 2014. A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 4 (2014), 1--35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Gupta, J. Gao, C. Aggarwal, and J. Han. 2014a. Outlier Detection for Temporal Data. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. 1--129 pages.Google Scholar
- M. Gupta, J. Gao, C. Aggarwal, and J. Han. 2014b. Outlier detection for temporal data: A survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26, 9 (2014), 2250--2267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. M. Hawkins. 1980. Identification of Outliers. Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
- D. J. Hill and B. S. Minsker. 2010. Anomaly detection in streaming environmental sensor data: A data-driven modeling approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 25, 9 (2010), 1014--1022.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Hochenbaum, O. S. Vallis, and A. Kejariwal. 2017. Automatic anomaly detection in the cloud via statistical learning. Retrieved from https://arXiv:1704.07706.Google Scholar
- V. Hodge and J. Austin. 2004. A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artific. Intell. Rev. 22, 2 (2004), 85--126.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Holešovský, M. Čampulová, and J. Michálek. 2018. Semiparametric outlier detection in nonstationary times series: Case study for atmospheric pollution in Brno, Czech Republic. Atmosph. Pollut. Res. 9, 1 (2018), 27--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hu, X. Feng, Z. Ji, K. Yan, and S. Zhou. 2019. A novel computational approach for discord search with local recurrence rates in multivariate time series. Info. Sci. 477 (2019), 220--233.Google Scholar
- K. Hundman, V. Constantinou, C. Laporte, I. Colwell, and T. Soderstrom. 2018. Detecting spacecraft anomalies using LSTMs and nonparametric dynamic thresholding. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 387--395.Google Scholar
- R. J. Hyndman, E. Wang, and N. Laptev. 2015. Large-scale unusual time series detection. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW’15). IEEE, 1616--1619.Google Scholar
- V. Ishimtsev, A. Bernstein, E. Burnaev, and I. Nazarov. 2017. Conformal k-NN anomaly detector for univariate data streams. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Conformal and Probabilistic Prediction and Applications, Vol. 60. PMLR, 213--227.Google Scholar
- A. Iturria, J. Carrasco, S. Charramendieta, A. Conde, and F. Herrera. 2020. OTSAD: A package for online time-series anomaly detectors. Neurocomputing 374 (2020), 49--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Izakian and W. Pedrycz. 2013. Anomaly detection in time series data using a fuzzy c-means clustering. In Proceedings of the Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting. IEEE, 1513--1518.Google Scholar
- H.V. Jagadish, N. Koudas, and S. Muthukrishnan. 1999. Mining deviants in a time series database. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 102--113.Google Scholar
- M. Jones, D. Nikovski, M. Imamura, and T. Hirata. 2014. Anomaly detection in real-valued multidimensional time series. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bigdata/Socialcom/Cybersecurity. Citeseer.Google Scholar
- M. Jones, D. Nikovski, M. Imamura, and T. Hirata. 2016. Exemplar learning for extremely efficient anomaly detection in real-valued time series. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 30, 6 (2016), 1427--1454.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Keogh, K. Chakrabarti, M. Pazzani, and S. Mehrotra. 2001. Dimensionality reduction for fast similarity search in large time series databases. Knowl. Info. Syst. 3, 3 (2001), 263--286.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Keogh and J. Lin. 2005. Clustering of time-series subsequences is meaningless: Implications for previous and future research. Knowl. Info. Syst. 8, 2 (2005), 154--177.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Keogh, J. Lin, and A. Fu. 2005. HOT SAX: Efficiently finding the most unusual time series subsequence. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’05). IEEE, 226--233.Google Scholar
- E. Keogh, J. Lin, S. H. Lee, and H. van Herle. 2007. Finding the most unusual time series subsequence: Algorithms and applications. Knowl. Info. Syst. 11, 1 (2007), 1--27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Keogh, S. Lonardi, and B. Y. C. Chiu. 2002. Finding surprising patterns in a time series database in linear time and space. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’02). ACM, 550--556.Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Kieu, B. Yang, and C. S. Jensen. 2018. Outlier detection for multidimensional time series using deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, 125--134.Google Scholar
- N. Kumar, N. Lolla, E. Keogh, S. Lonardi, and C. A. Ratanamahatana. 2005. Time-series bitmaps: A practical visualization tool for working with large time series databases. In Proceedings of the 5th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 531--535.Google Scholar
- N. Laptev, S. Amizadeh, and I. Flint. 2015. Generic and scalable framework for automated time-series anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’15). ACM, 1939--1947.Google Scholar
- J. A. Lara, D. Lizcano, V. Rampérez, and J. Soriano. 2020. A method for outlier detection based on cluster analysis and visual expert criteria. Expert Syst. 37, 5 (2020), 1--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Li, O. Bräysy, L. Jiang, Z. Wu, and Y. Wang. 2013. Finding time series discord based on bit representation clustering. Knowl.-Based Syst. 54 (2013), 243--254.Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Li, Z. Li, J. Han, and J. G. Lee. 2009. Temporal outlier detection in vehicle traffic data. In Proceedings of the IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, 1319--1322.Google Scholar
- J. Lin, E. Keogh, A. Fu, and H. Van Herle. 2005. Approximations to magic: Finding unusual medical time series. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. IEEE, 329--334.Google Scholar
- Y. Liu, X. Chen, F. Wang, and J. Yin. 2009. Efficient detection of discords for time series stream. In Proceedings of the Joint International Conferences on Advances in Data and Web Management. Springer, Berlin, 629--634.Google Scholar
- M. Longoni, D. Carrera, B. Rossi, P. Fragneto, M. Pessione, and G. Boracchi. 2018. A wearable device for online and long-term ECG monitoring. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 5838--5840.Google Scholar
- V. Losing, B. Hammer, and H. Wersing. 2018. Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms. Neurocomputing 275 (2018), 1261--1274.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Lu, Y. Liu, Z. Fei, and C. Guan. 2018. An outlier detection algorithm based on cross-correlation analysis for time series dataset. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 53593--53610.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Mehrang, E. Helander, M. Pavel, A. Chieh, and I. Korhonen. 2015. Outlier detection in weight time series of connected scales. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM’15). IEEE, 1489--1496.Google Scholar
- H. D. K. Moonesinghe and P. N. Tan. 2006. Outlier detection using random walks. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’06). IEEE, 532--539.Google Scholar
- U. Mori, A. Mendiburu, and J. A. Lozano. 2016. Similarity measure selection for clustering time series databases. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28, 1 (2016), 181--195.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Munir, S. A. Siddiqui, A. Dengel, and S. Ahmed. 2019. DeepAnT: A deep learning approach for unsupervised anomaly detection in time series. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 1991--2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Muthukrishnan, R. Shah, and J. S. Vitter. 2004. Mining deviants in time series data streams. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. IEEE, 41--50.Google Scholar
- S. Papadimitriou, J. Sun, and C. Faloutsos. 2005. Streaming pattern discovery in multiple time-series. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB’05). ACM, 697--708.Google Scholar
- F. Rasheed and R. Alhajj. 2014. A framework for periodic outlier pattern detection in time-series sequences. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 44, 5 (2014), 569--582.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Rasheed, M. Alshalalfa, and R. Alhajj. 2011. Efficient periodicity mining in time series databases using suffix trees. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23, 1 (2011), 79--94.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. A. Ratanamahatana, J. Lin, D. Gunopulos, E. Keogh, M. Vlachos, and G. Das. 2010. Mining time series data. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook (2nd ed.), Oded Maimon and Lior Rokach (Eds.). Springer US, 1049--1077.Google Scholar
- U. Rebbapragada, P. Protopapas, C. E. Brodley, and C. Alcock. 2009. Finding anomalous periodic time series: An application to catalogs of periodic variable stars. Mach. Learn. 74, 3 (2009), 281--313.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Reddy, M. Ordway-West, M. Lee, M. Dugan, J. Whitney, R. Kahana, B. Ford, J. Muedsam, A. Henslee, and M. Rao. 2017. Using Gaussian mixture models to detect outliers in seasonal univariate network traffic. In Proceedings of the IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW’17). IEEE, 229--234.Google Scholar
- H. Ren, M. Liu, Z. Li, and W. Pedrycz. 2017. A piecewise aggregate pattern representation approach for anomaly detection in time series. Knowl.-Based Syst. 135 (2017), 29--39.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Sakurada and T. Yairi. 2014. Anomaly detection using autoencoders with nonlinear dimensionality reduction. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning for Sensory Data Analysis (MLSDA’14). ACM, 4--12.Google Scholar
- H. Sanchez and B. Bustos. 2014. Anomaly detection in streaming time series based on bounding boxes. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Similarity Search and Applications (SISAP’14). Springer, Cham, 201--213.Google Scholar
- P. Senin. 2018. jmotif: Time Series Analysis Toolkit Based on Symbolic Aggregate Dicretization, i.e., SAX. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=jmotif.Google Scholar
- P. Senin, J. Lin, X. Wang, T. Oates, S. Gandhi, A. P. Boedihardjo, C. Chen, and S. Frankenstein. 2015. Time series anomaly discovery with grammar-based compression. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’15). OpenProceedings.org, 481--492.Google Scholar
- P. Senin, J. Lin, X. Wang, T. Oates, S. Gandhi, A. P. Boedihardjo, C. Chen, and S. Frankenstein. 2018. GrammarViz 3.0: Interactive discovery of variable-length time series patterns. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 12, 1 (2018), 1--28.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. S. Shahriar, D. Smith, A. Rahman, M. Freeman, J. Hills, R. Rawnsley, D. Henry, and G. Bishop-Hurley. 2016. Detecting heat events in dairy cows using accelerometers and unsupervised learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 128 (2016), 20--26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Siffer, P. A. Fouque, A. Termier, and C. Largouët. 2017. Anomaly detection in streams with extreme value theory. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’17). ACM, 1067--1075.Google Scholar
- J. A. Silva, E. R. Faria, R. C. Barros, E. R. Hruschka, A. C. De Carvalho, and J. Gama. 2013. Data stream clustering: A survey. Comput. Surveys 46, 1 (2013), 1--37.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Song, A. Zhang, J. Wang, and P. S. Yu. 2015. SCREEN: Stream data cleaning under speed constraints. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 827--841.Google Scholar
- Y. Su, Y. Zhao, C. Niu, R. Liu, W. Sun, and D. Pei. 2019. Robust anomaly detection for multivariate time series through stochastic recurrent neural network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’19). 2828--2837.Google Scholar
- R. S. Tsay. 1988. Outliers, level shifts, and variance changes in time series. J. Forecast. 7 (1988), 1--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. S. Tsay, D. Peña, and A. E. Pankratz. 2000. Outliers in multivariate time series. Biometrika 87, 4 (2000), 789--804.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Tsymbal. 2004. The Problem of Concept Drift: Definitions and Related Work. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science, Trinity College: Dublin.Google Scholar
- X. Wang, J. Lin, N. Patel, and M. Braun. 2018. Exact variable-length anomaly detection algorithm for univariate and multivariate time series. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 32, 6 (2018), 1806--1844.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Wei, N. Kumar, V. Lolla, E. Keogh, S. Lonardi, and C. Ann. 2005. Assumption-free anomaly detection in time series. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM’05). Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 237--240.Google Scholar
- X. Xu, H. Liu, and M. Yao. 2019. Recent progress of anomaly detection. Complexity 2019 (2019), 1--11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Xu, K. Kersting, and L. von Ritter. 2016. Adaptive streaming anomaly analysis. In Proceedings of NIPS Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Data Science.Google Scholar
- Z. Xu, K. Kersting, and L. von Ritter. 2017. Stochastic online anomaly analysis for streaming time series. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’17). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 3189--3195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Yang, W. Wang, and P. S. Yu. 2001. InfoMiner: Mining surprising periodic patterns. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’01). ACM, 395--400.Google Scholar
- J. Yang, W. Wang, and P. S. Yu. 2004. Mining surprising periodic patterns. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 9 (2004), 189--216.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Ye and E. Keogh. 2009. Time series shapelets: A new primitive for data mining. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’09). ACM, 947--956.Google Scholar
- A. Zhang, S. Song, and J. Wang. 2016. Sequential data cleaning: A statistical approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’16). ACM, 909--924.Google Scholar
- Y. Zhang, N. A. S. Hamm, N. Meratnia, A. Stein, M. van de Voort, and P. J. M. Havinga. 2012. Statistics-based outlier detection for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci. 26, 8 (2012), 1373--1392.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Zhou, R. Arghandeh, and C. J. Spanos. 2016. Online learning of Contextual Hidden Markov Models for temporal-spatial data analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 6335--6341.Google Scholar
- Y. Zhou, R. Arghandeh, H. Zou, and C. J. Spanos. 2019. Nonparametric event detection in multiple time series for power distribution networks. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 66, 2 (2019), 1619--1628.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Zhou, R. Qin, H. Xu, S. Sadiq, and Y. Yu. 2018a. A data quality control method for seafloor observatories: The application of observed time series data in the East China Sea. Sensors 18, 8 (2018), 2628.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Zhou, H. Zou, R. Arghandeh, W. Gu, and C. J. Spanos. 2018b. Non-parametric outliers detection in multiple time series a case study: Power grid data analysis. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 4605--4612.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A Review on Outlier/Anomaly Detection in Time Series Data
Recommendations
Outlier/Anomaly Detection of Univariate Time Series: A Dataset Collection and Benchmark
Big Data Analytics and Knowledge DiscoveryAbstractIn this paper, we present an extensive collection of outlier/anomaly detection tasks to identify unusual series from a given time series dataset. The presented work is based on the popular UCR time series classification archive. In addition to the ...
A Novel Outlier Detection Scheme for Network Intrusion Detection Systems
ISA '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008)Network intrusion detection system serves as a second line of defense to intrusion prevention. Anomaly detection approach is important in order to detect new attacks. This paper adopted connectivity-based outlier detection scheme from statistical field ...
Fusing anomaly detection with false positive mitigation methodology for predictive maintenance under multivariate time series
AbstractAnomaly detection aims to identify observations that differ significantly from the majority of the data. Time series, which are data with a temporal component, is often used for anomaly detection. Identifying anomalies is not perfect and may ...
Highlights- Proposed methodology decreases impact from FPs in anomaly detection.
- A thorough comparison with latest SOA methods is performed.
- We also provide a series of hints for applying the methodology.
- High sensitivity methods are more ...
Comments