Marco Kurzweg
Katrin Wolf
ABSTRACT
During physical games, we love to socially interact with other players through bluffing or giving them hits. This work aims to enrich AR characters by adding a suggestive behavior to them intended to playfully influence game decisions. In a user study, we evaluated such behaviors presented as body postures by animated card characters using an AR trading card game. Our results indicate that AR characters can indeed influence the player’s game decisions through postures that encourage or discourage to play a certain card. Our approach enriches the game design space, can make the game more interesting, and finally adds a social component to the game.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
pdf
p288-kurzweg-appendix.pdf (62.8 KB)
Rules of the AR Trading Card Game
- Saskia Bakker, Debby Vorstenbosch, Elise van den Hoven, Gerard Hollemans, and Tom Bergman. 2007. Weathergods: Tangible Interaction in a Digital Tabletop Game. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) (TEI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227000Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Albert Bandura. 1977. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological review 84, 2 (1977), 191.Google Scholar
- C Daniel Batson, Tricia R Klein, Lori Highberger, and Laura L Shaw. 1995. Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict.Journal of personality and social psychology 68, 6(1995), 1042.Google Scholar
- Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Judee K. Burgoon. 2003. Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 12, 5 (Oct. 2003), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Callow and L. Hardy. 2001. Types of Imagery Associated with Sport Confidence in Netball Players of Varying Skill Levels. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 13, 1 (2001), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200109339001 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200109339001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jenova Chen. 2007. Flow in Games (and Everything Else). Commun. ACM 50, 4 (April 2007), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/1232743.1232769Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna Cox, Paul Cairns, Pari Shah, and Michael Carroll. 2012. Not Doing but Thinking: The Role of Challenge in the Gaming Experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207689Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark H Davis. 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of personality and social psychology 44, 1(1983), 113.Google Scholar
- de Kort Yvonne A. W., IJsselsteijn Wijnand A., and Gajadhar Brian J.2007. People, Places, and Play: A research framework for digital game experience in a socio-spatial context. In DiGRA '07 - Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play. The University of Tokyo. http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/07311.21038.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Celso M de Melo, Peter Carnevale, and Jonathan Gratch. 2011. The effect of expression of anger and happiness in computer agents on negotiations with humans. In The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 3. 937–944.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andreas Diekmann. 2009. Spieltheorie - Einführung, Beispiele, Experimente (4. aufl. ed.). Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verla, Reinbek bei Hamburg.Google Scholar
- Avinash K. Dixit and Barry J. Nalebuff. 1997. Spieltheorie für Einsteiger - strategisches Know-how für Gewinner. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
- Ylva Ferstl, Elena Kokkinara, and Rachel Mcdonnell. 2017. Facial Features of Non-Player Creatures Can Influence Moral Decisions in Video Games. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 15, 1, Article 4 (Sept. 2017), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129561Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian Gajadhar, Yvonne de Kort, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2008. Influence of Social Setting on Player Experience of Digital Games. In CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI EA ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358814Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian J. Gajadhar, Yvonne A. Kort, and Wijnand A. Ijsselsteijn. 2008. Shared Fun Is Doubled Fun: Player Enjoyment As a Function of Social Setting. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Fun and Games (Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88322-7_11Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian J. Gajadhar, Henk Herman Nap, Yvonne A. W. de Kort, and Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn. 2010. Out of Sight, out of Mind: Co-player Effects on Seniors’ Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games (Leuven, Belgium) (Fun and Games ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823826Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max Kinateder, Enrico Ronchi, Daniel Gromer, Mathias Müller, Michael Jost, Markus Nehfischer, Andreas Mühlberger, and Paul Pauli. 2014. Social influence on route choice in a virtual reality tunnel fire. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 26 (2014), 116–125.Google Scholar
- Mehmet Kosa and Pieter Spronck. 2018. What Tabletop Players Think About Augmented Tabletop Games: A Content Analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games(Malmö, Sweden) (FDG ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235782Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicole C. Krämer, Bilge Karacora, Gale Lucas, Morteza Dehghani, Gina Rüther, and Jonathan Gratch. 2016. Closing the Gender Gap in STEM with Friendly Male Instructors? On the Effects of Rapport Behavior and Gender of a Virtual Agent in an Instructional Interaction. Comput. Educ. 99, C (Aug. 2016), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Lankes, Matej Rajtár, Oleg Denisov, and Bernhard Maurer. 2018. Socialeyes: Social Gaze in Collaborative 3D Games. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (Malmö, Sweden) (FDG ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235766Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Lankes, Daniel Rammer, and Bernhard Maurer. 2017. Eye Contact: Gaze as a Connector Between Spectators and Players in Online Games. In Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2017: 16th IFIP TC 14 International Conference, Tsukuba City, Japan, September 18-21, 2017, Proceedings (2017-01-01), Nagisa Munekata, Itsuki Kunita, and Junichi Hoshino (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66715-7_34Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petri Lankoski. 2004. Character design fundamentals for role-playing games. Beyond Role and Play(2004), 139–148.Google Scholar
- Pedro Lopes and Patrick Baudisch. 2013. Muscle-Propelled Force Feedback: Bringing Force Feedback to Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2577–2580. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481355Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gale M. Lucas, Janina Lehr, Nicole Krämer, and Jonathan Gratch. 2019. The Effectiveness of Social Influence Tactics When Used by a Virtual Agent. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (Paris, France) (IVA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308532.3329464Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan L. Mandryk and Kori M. Inkpen. 2004. Physiological Indicators for the Evaluation of Co-located Collaborative Play. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chicago, Illinois, USA) (CSCW ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031625Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan L. Mandryk and Diego S. Maranan. 2002. False Prophets: Exploring Hybrid Board/Video Games. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (CHI EA ’02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 640–641. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506523Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernhard Maurer, Michael Lankes, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2018. Where the eyes meet: Lessons learned from shared gaze-based interactions in cooperative and competitive online games. Entertainment Computing 27 (2018), 47 – 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.02.009Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernhard Maurer, Vincent Van Rheden, Martin Murer, Alina Krischkowsky, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. Reign in Blood: Exploring Blood as a Material for Game Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(Stuttgart, Germany) (MUM ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3156610Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Meehan, Brent Insko, Mary Whitton, and Frederick P. Brooks, Jr.2002. Physiological Measures of Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (San Antonio, Texas) (SIGGRAPH ’02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1145/566570.566630Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kathryn Merrick. 2008. Modeling Motivation for Adaptive Nonplayer Characters in Dynamic Computer Game Worlds. Comput. Entertain. 5, 4, Article 5 (March 2008), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1324198.1324203Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krista Munroe-Chandler, Craig Hall, and Graham Fishburne. 2008. Playing with confidence: The relationship between imagery use and self-confidence and self-efficacy in youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences 26, 14 (2008), 1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802315419 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802315419PMID: 18949659.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeanne Nakamura and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2009. Flow theory and research. Handbook of positive psychology(2009), 195–206.Google Scholar
- Catherine Pelachaud. 2009. Studies on gesture expressivity for a virtual agent. Speech Communication 51 (07 2009), 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2008.04.009Google ScholarDigital Library
- Niklas Ravaja, Timo Saari, Marko Turpeinen, Jari Laarni, Mikko Salminen, and Matias Kivikangas. 2006. Spatial Presence and Emotions During Video Game Playing: Does It Matter with Whom You Play?Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 15, 4 (Aug. 2006), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.15.4.381Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jens Reinhardt, Luca Hillen, and Katrin Wolf. 2020. Embedding Conversational Agents into AR: Invisible or with a Realistic Human Body?. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374956Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heidi R Riggio and Ronald E Riggio. 2010. Appearance-based trait inferences and voting: Evolutionary roots and implications for leadership. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 34, 2 (2010), 119–125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katja Rogers, Maria Aufheimer, Michael Weber, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2018. Exploring the Role of Non-Player Characters and Gender in Player Identification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (CHI PLAY ’18 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3273041Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs, and Wally Smith. 2016. ”I Love All the Bits”: The Materiality of Boardgames. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3956–3969. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858433Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin R. Gibbs, and Wally Smith. 2018. Cooperating to Compete: The Mutuality of Cooperation and Competition in Boardgame Play. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 193, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173767Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter AM Ruijten, Jaap Ham, and Cees JH Midden. 2014. Investigating the influence of social exclusion on persuasion by a virtual agent. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, 191–200.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Valentin Schwind, Katrin Wolf, and Niels Henze. 2018. Avoiding the Uncanny Valley in Virtual Character Design. Interactions 25, 5 (Aug. 2018), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236673Google ScholarDigital Library
- Youssef Shiban, Iris Schelhorn, Verena Jobst, Alexander Hörnlein, Frank Puppe, Paul Pauli, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2015. The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015), 5–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dorothé Smit, Bernhard Maurer, Martin Murer, Jens Reinhardt, and Katrin Wolf. 2019. Be the Meeple: New Perspectives on Traditional Board Games. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295657Google ScholarDigital Library
- EN Sokolov, NI Nezlina, VB Polyanskii, and DV Evtikhin. 2001. The orientational reflex: the targeting reaction and the projector of attention. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat 51 (2001), 421–437.Google Scholar
- Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (July 2005), 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anders Tychsen, Michael Hitchens, and Thea Brolund. 2008. Character Play: The Use of Game Characters in Multi-Player Role-Playing Games across Platforms. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 22 (July 2008), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371225Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Wallace, Joseph Pape, Yu-Ling Betty Chang, Phillip J. McClelland, T.C. Nicholas Graham, Stacey D. Scott, and Mark Hancock. 2012. Exploring Automation in Digital Tabletop Board Game. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141585Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiaming You and Michael Katchabaw. 2010. A Flexible Multi-Model Approach to Psychosocial Integration in Non Player Characters in Modern Video Games. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (Futureplay ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920782Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Augmented Table-Top Role-Playing Game with Movement-Based Gameplay and Arm-Worn Devices
DIS '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive SystemsAugmenting table-top role-playing games (TTRPG) is a trending subject in game research. Different objects and interaction modalities such as surface displays, tangible devices or interactive rooms are used for the augmentation of TTRPG. Still, usage of ...
Developing an augmented reality racing game
INTETAIN '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on INtelligent TEchnologies for interactive enterTAINmentAugmented reality (AR) makes it possible to create games in which virtual objects are overlaid on the real world, and real objects are tracked and used to control virtual ones. We describe the development of an AR racing game created by modifying an ...
A player engagement model for an augmented reality game: a case of pokémon go
OzCHI '16: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionIn this paper, we discuss players' engagement in playing Augmented Reality (AR) games. We present four concepts in playing AR games including: 'Player', 'Play', 'Presence', and 'Place'. We discuss each concept based on the individual user scenario using ...
Comments