Andrea I. Scheiter
ABSTRACT
When prototyping automated vehicles using the WoZ methodology, the driving behavior simulated by driving wizards significantly shapes participants’ experience during the experiment. Therefore, driving wizards should be provided with instructions regarding the automated driving behavior. However, they are currently instructed in different ways. It is hypothesized that different instructions lead to differing mental models and consequently to a differing realization of the automated driving behavior to be simulated. A study using a right-hand drive vehicle was conducted where participants acted as driving wizards. Three different instructions were tested at two test times (3x2 within-subjects design, N = 14). As a result, a set of rules, that driving wizards may use when simulating an automated driving style, was developed. Using qualitative & quantitative guidelines as instructions might lead to a more homogeneous mental model between several driving wizards as well as for the same driving wizard at different points in time.
- Christer Ahlstrom and Katja Kircher. 2017. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study. Applied Ergonomics 58(2017), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.001Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Craig K. Allison and Neville A. Stanton. 2019. Eco-driving: the role of feedback in reducing emissions from everyday driving behaviours. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20, 2 (2019), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2018.1484967Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cindie Andrieu and Guillaume Saint Pierre. 2012. Comparing Effects of Eco-driving Training and Simple Advices on Driving Behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 54 (Oct. 2012), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.740Google Scholar
- Norbert Bach. 2000. Mentale Modelle als Basis von Implementierungsstrategien: Konzepte für ein erfolgreiches Change Management. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08757-1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonia Baltodano, Srinath Sibi, Nikolas Martelaro, Nikhil Gowda, and Wendy Ju. 2015. The RRADS Platform: A Real Road Autonomous Driving Simulator. In 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ayse Eren and Vicki Antrobus (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799288Google Scholar
- Hanna Bellem, Thorben Schönenberg, Josef F. Krems, and Michael Schrauf. 2016. Objective metrics of comfort: Developing a driving style for highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 41 (Aug. 2016), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.05.005Google Scholar
- Sabrina Beloufa, Fabrice Cauchard, Joël Vedrenne, Benjamin Vailleau, Andras Kemeny, Frédéric Mérienne, and Jean-Michel Boucheix. 2019. Learning eco-driving behaviour in a driving simulator: Contribution of instructional videos and interactive guidance system. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 61 (Feb. 2019), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.010Google Scholar
- Klaus Bengler, Kamil Omozik, and Andrea Isabell Müller. 2020. The Renaissance of Wizard of Oz (WoOz): Using the WoOz methodology to prototype automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2019 Annual Conference, Dick de Waard (Ed.). 63–72.Google Scholar
- Klaus Bengler, Michael Rettenmaier, Nicole Fritz, and Alexander Feierle. 2020. From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving. Information 11 (Jan. 2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020061Google Scholar
- Niels Ole Bernsen, Hans Dybkjær, and Laila Dybkjær. 1994. Wizard of Oz Prototyping: When and How?. In CCI Working Papers in Cognitive Science and HCI.Google Scholar
- Erik Coelingh, Jonas Nilsson, and Jude Buffum. 2018. Driving tests for self-driving cars. IEEE Spectrum 55, 3 (March 2018), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8302386Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanie Cramer, Tabea Blenk, Martin Albert, and David Sauer. 2020. Evaluation of different driving styles during conditionally automated highway driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2019 Annual Conference, Dick de Waard (Ed.). 85–96.Google Scholar
- Fredrick Ekman, Mikael Johansson, Lars-Ola Bligård, MariAnne Karlsson, and Helena Strömberg. 2019. Exploring automated vehicle driving styles as a source of trust information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 65 (Aug. 2019), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.026Google Scholar
- Carina Fors, Katja Kircher, and Christer Ahlström. 2015. Interface design of eco-driving support systems – Truck drivers’ preferences and behavioural compliance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58 (Sept. 2015), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.035Google Scholar
- Norman M. Fraser and G. Nigel Gilbert. 1991. Simulating speech systems. Computer Speech and Language 5 (1991), 81–99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul Green and L. Wei-Haas. 1985. The Wizard of Oz: A Tool for Rapid development of User Interfaces. Report No. UMTRI-85-27. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, USA.Google Scholar
- Franziska Hartwich, Matthias Beggiato, and Josef F. Krems. 2018. Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving–effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics 61, 7 (Feb. 2018), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Hamish Jamson, Daryl L. Hibberd, and Natasha Merat. 2015. Interface design considerations for an in-vehicle eco-driving assistance system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58 (Sept. 2015), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.008Google Scholar
- Oliver Jarosch, Svenja Paradies, Daniel Feiner, and Klaus Bengler. 2019. Effects of non-driving related tasks in prolonged conditional automated driving – A Wizard of Oz on-road approach in real traffic environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 65 (Aug. 2019), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.023Google Scholar
- Wendy Ju. 2015. The Design of Implicit Interactions. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics (2015).Google Scholar
- Wen-Tai Lai. 2015. The effects of eco-driving motivation, knowledge and reward intervention on fuel efficiency. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 34 (Jan. 2015), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.003Google Scholar
- Philipp Mayring. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, Günther Mey and Katja Mruck (Eds.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 601–613.Google Scholar
- Andrea Isabell Müller, Veronika Weinbeer, and Klaus Bengler. 2019. Using the Wizard of Oz Paradigm to Prototype Automated Vehicles: Methodological Challenges. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM Press, New York, NY, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351526Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frederik Naujoks, Christian Purucker, Katharina Wiedemann, and Claus Marberger. 2019. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non–Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality. Human Factors 61, 4 (Jan. 2019), 596–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818824002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kamil Omozik, Yucheng Yang, Isabella Kuntermann, Sebastian Hergeth, and Klaus Bengler. 2019. How long does it take to relax? Observation of driver behaviour during real-world conditionally automated driving. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. 245–251.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanna M. Pampel, Samantha L. Jamson, Daryl L. Hibberd, and Yvonne Barnard. 2015. How I reduce fuel consumption: An experimental study on mental models of eco-driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58 (Sept. 2015), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.005Google Scholar
- Ingrid Pettersson and Wendy Ju. 2017. Design Techniques for Exploring Automotive Interaction in the Drive towards Automation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Oli Mival (Ed.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064666Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonas Radlmayr, Thomas Selzer, Antonio Arcati, and Klaus Bengler. 2015. Haptic Gear Shifting Indication: Evaluating Acceptance and Potential Fuel Consumption Reduction. Procedia Manufacturing 3(2015), 2746–2752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.694Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark J.M. Sullman, Lisa Dorn, and Pirita Niemi. 2015. Eco-driving training of professional bus drivers – Does it work?Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 58 (Sept. 2015), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.010Google Scholar
- Mark Turner and Michael J. Griffin. 1999. Motion sickness in public road transport: The relative importance of motion, vision and individual differences. British Journal of Psychology 90 (Nov. 1999), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712699161594Google Scholar
- Mascha van der Voort, Mark S. Dougherty, and Martin van Maarseveen. 2000. A prototype fuel-efficiency support tool. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 9 (Aug. 2000), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00038-3Google Scholar
- Peter Wang, Srinath Sibi, Brian Mok, and Wendy Ju. 2017. Marionette: Enabling On-Road Wizard-of-Oz Autonomous Driving Studies. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Bilge Mutlu and M. Tscheligi (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020256Google ScholarDigital Library
- Veronika Weinbeer, Christoph Baur, Jonas Radlmayr, Julian-Sebastian Bill, Tobias Muhr, and Klaus Bengler. 2017. Highly automated driving: How to get the driver drowsy and how does drowsiness influence various take-over aspects?. In 8. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, Einführung hochautomatisiertes Fahren.Google Scholar
- Veronika Weinbeer, Julian-Sebastian Bill, Christoph Baur, and Klaus Bengler. 2018. Automated driving: subjective assessment of different strategies to manage drowsiness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergononomics Society Europe Chapter 2017 Annual Conference. 5–17.Google Scholar
- Veronika Weinbeer, Tobias Muhr, and Klaus Bengler. 2018. Automated Driving: The Potential of Non-driving Related Tasks to Manage Driver Drowsiness. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Sebastiano Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita(Eds.). Springer, Cham, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_19Google Scholar
- Alf Zimmer. 2002. Über die Ergonomie hinaus: Neue Wege zu einer menschgerechten Technikgestaltung.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Mental Model of Driving Wizards When Simulating an Automated Drive
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Using the wizard of Oz paradigm to prototype automated vehicles: methodological challenges
AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct ProceedingsWizard of Oz (WoOz) vehicles are becoming increasingly popular within the human factors research community to prototype automated vehicles in real traffic conditions. With promising results, researchers have so far used the WoOz approach, among other ...
Development and Initial Evaluation of an Assisting Display Concept for Driving Wizards
OzCHI '21: Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer InteractionTo realize the full potential of automated vehicles (AVs), human-vehicle interaction needs to be modified to enable extended use cases, such as working or resting during the ride. The majority of required user studies are conducted in a driving ...
Driver Behavior in Conditional Automation: Comparison of Driving Simulator and Wizard of Oz Conditions
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we analyzed driver behavior during automated driving in two experimental conditions, a Driving Simulator (DS) and a Wizard of Oz vehicle (WOz). Twenty-nine drivers in the DS condition and nine drivers in the WOz condition performed three ...
Comments