skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Light stage super-resolution: continuous high-frequency relighting

Published:27 November 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The light stage has been widely used in computer graphics for the past two decades, primarily to enable the relighting of human faces. By capturing the appearance of the human subject under different light sources, one obtains the light transport matrix of that subject, which enables image-based relighting in novel environments. However, due to the finite number of lights in the stage, the light transport matrix only represents a sparse sampling on the entire sphere. As a consequence, relighting the subject with a point light or a directional source that does not coincide exactly with one of the lights in the stage requires interpolation and resampling the images corresponding to nearby lights, and this leads to ghosting shadows, aliased specularities, and other artifacts. To ameliorate these artifacts and produce better results under arbitrary high-frequency lighting, this paper proposes a learning-based solution for the "super-resolution" of scans of human faces taken from a light stage. Given an arbitrary "query" light direction, our method aggregates the captured images corresponding to neighboring lights in the stage, and uses a neural network to synthesize a rendering of the face that appears to be illuminated by a "virtual" light source at the query location. This neural network must circumvent the inherent aliasing and regularity of the light stage data that was used for training, which we accomplish through the use of regularized traditional interpolation methods within our network. Our learned model is able to produce renderings for arbitrary light directions that exhibit realistic shadows and specular highlights, and is able to generalize across a wide variety of subjects. Our super-resolution approach enables more accurate renderings of human subjects under detailed environment maps, or the construction of simpler light stages that contain fewer light sources while still yielding comparable quality renderings as light stages with more densely sampled lights.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a260-sun.mov

mov

195.7 MB

3414685.3417821.mp4

mp4

573.3 MB

References

  1. Martin Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, et al. 2016. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. OSDI (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple. 2017. Use Portrait mode on your iPhone. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jin-Xiang Chai, Xin Tong, Shing-Chow Chan, and Heung-Yeung Shum. 2000. Plenoptic Sampling. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhen Cheng, Zhiwei Xiong, Chang Chen, and Dong Liu. 2019. Light Field Super-Resolution: A Benchmark. In CVPR Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Paul Debevec. 2012. The Light Stages and Their Applications to Photoreal Digital Actors. In SIGGRAPH Asia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul Debevec, Tim Hawkins, Chris Tchou, Haarm-Pieter Duiker, Westley Sarokin, and Mark Sagar. 2000. Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Frédo Durand, Nicolas Holzschuch, Cyril Soler, Eric Chan, and François X. Sillion. 2005. A Frequency Analysis of Light Transport. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin Fuchs, Hendrik PA Lensch, Volker Blanz, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2007. Superresolution reflectance fields: Synthesizing images for intermediate light directions. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 26. Wiley Online Library, 447--456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaiwen Guo, Jason Dourgarian, Danhang Tang, Anastasia tkach, Adarsh Kowdle, Emily Cooper, Mingsong Dou, Sean Fanello, Graham Fyffe, Christoph Rhemann, Jonathan Taylor, Peter Lincoln, Paul Debevec, Shahram Izad, Philip Davidson, Jay Busch, Xueming Yu, Matt Whalen, Geoff Harvey, Sergio Orts-Escolano, and Rohit Pandey. 2019. The Relightables: Volumetric Performance Capture of Humans with Realistic Relighting. In SIGGRAPH Asia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2015. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. CVPR (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nima Khademi Kalantari, Ting-Chun Wang, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. 2016. Learning-based view synthesis for light field cameras. SIGGRAPH (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaizhang Kang, Zimin Chen, Jiaping Wang, Kun Zhou, and Hongzhi Wu. 2018. Efficient reflectance capture using an autoencoder. SIGGRAPH (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2018. Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Markus Kettunen, Erik Härkönen, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2019. E-LPIPS: Robust Perceptual Image Similarity via Random Transformation Ensembles. CoRR abs/1906.03973 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03973Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. ICLR (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Stephen Lombardi, Jason Saragih, Tomas Simon, and Yaser Sheikh. 2018. Deep appearance models for face rendering. SIGGRAPH (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Vincent Masselus, Pieter Peers, Philip Dutré, and Yves D Willemsy. 2004. Smooth reconstruction and compact representation of reflectance functions for image-based relighting. In Proceedings of the fifteenth eurographics conference on rendering techniques.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Abhimitra Meka, Christian Haene, Rohit Pandey, Michael Zollhöfer, Sean Fanello, Graham Fyffe, Adarsh Kowdle, Xueming Yu, Jay Busch, Jason Dourgarian, et al. 2019. Deep Reflectance Fields: High-Quality Facial Reflectance Field Inference from Color Gradient Illumination.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Peyman Milanfar. 2010. Super-resolution imaging. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Rodrigo Ortiz-Cayon, Nima Khademi Kalantari, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Ren Ng, and Abhishek Kar. 2019. Local Light Field Fusion: Practical View Synthesis with Prescriptive Sampling Guidelines. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomas Nestmeyer, Iain Matthews, Jean-François Lalonde, and Andreas M Lehrmann. 2019. Structural Decompositions for End-to-End Relighting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.03355 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ren Ng, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Pat Hanrahan. 2003. All-Frequency Shadows using Non-Linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Matthew O'Toole and Kiriakos N. Kutulakos. 2010. Optical Computing for Fast Light Transport. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pieter Peers, Dhruv K Mahajan, Bruce Lamond, Abhijeet Ghosh, Wojciech Matusik, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Paul Debevec. 2009. Compressive Light Transport Sensing. ACM TOG (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilles Rainer, Wenzel Jakob, Abhijeet Ghosh, and Tim Weyrich. 2019. Neural btf compression and interpolation. In Computer Graphics Forum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ravi Ramamoorthi and Pat Hanrahan. 2001. A Signal-Processing Framework for Inverse Rendering. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peiran Ren, Yue Dong, Stephen Lin, Xin Tong, and Baining Guo. 2015. Image Based Relighting Using Neural Networks. ACM TOG (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Peiran Ren, Jiaping Wang, Minmin Gong, Stephen Lin, Xin Tong, and Baining Guo. 2013. Global illumination with radiance regression functions. SIGGRAPH (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In MICCAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. I Sato, T Okabe, Y Sato, and K Ikeuchi. 2003. Appearance Sampling for Obtaining a set of basis images for variable illumination. In ICCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. P. Sen and S. Darabi. 2009. Compressive Dual Photography. Computer Graphics Forum (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Soumyadip Sengupta, Angjoo Kanazawa, Carlos D. Castillo, and David W. Jacobs. 2018. SfSNet: Learning Shape, Reflectance and Illuminance of Faces in the Wild. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. JMLR (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiancheng Sun, Jonathan T. Barron, Yun-Ta Tsai, Zexiang Xu, Xueming Yu, Graham Fyffe, Christoph Rhemann, Jay Busch, Paul E. Debevec, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. 2019. Single Image Portrait Relighting. SIGGRAPH (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ayush Tewari, Ohad Fried, Justus Thies, Vincent Sitzmann, Stephen Lombardi, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Tomas Simon, Jason Saragih, Matthias Nießner, et al. 2020. State of the Art on Neural Rendering. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Borom Tunwattanapong, Graham Fyffe, Paul Graham, Jay Busch, Xueming Yu, Abhijeet Ghosh, and Paul Debevec. 2013. Acquiring reflectance and shape from continuous spherical harmonic illumination. SIGGRAPH (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Borom Tunwattanapong, Abhijeet Ghosh, and Paul Debevec. 2011. Practical image-based relighting and editing with spherical-harmonics and local lights. In 2011 Conference for Visual Media Production. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Dmitry Ulyanov, Andrea Vedaldi, and Victor Lempitsky. 2016. Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.08022 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J Wang, Y Dong, X Tong, Z Lin, and B Guo. 2009. Kernel Nystrom method for light transport. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik, Hamid R. Sheikh, and Eero P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. TIP (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Andreas Wenger, Andrew Gardner, Chris Tchou, Jonas Unger, Tim Hawkins, and Paul Debevec. 2005. Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-multiplexed Illumination. SIGGRAPH (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Robert J. Woodham. 1980. Photometric Method For Determining Surface Orientation From Multiple Images. Optical Engineering (1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuxin Wu and Kaiming He. 2018. Group Normalization. In ECCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Zexiang Xu, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Sunil Hadap, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. 2018. Deep image-based relighting from optimal sparse samples. In SIGGRAPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Light stage super-resolution: continuous high-frequency relighting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 39, Issue 6
        December 2020
        1605 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/3414685
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 November 2020
        Published in tog Volume 39, Issue 6

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader