skip to main content
10.1145/3371158.3371167acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Temporal Prediction of Socio-economic Indicators Using Satellite Imagery

Published:15 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Machine learning models based on satellite data have been actively researched to serve as a proxy for the prediction of socio-economic development indicators. Such models have however rarely been tested for transferability over time, i.e. whether models learned on data for a certain year are able to make accurate predictions on data for another year. Using a dataset from the Indian census at two time points, for the years 2001 and 2011, we evaluate the temporal transferability of a simple machine learning model at sub-national scales of districts and propose a generic method to improve its performance. This method can be especially relevant when training datasets are small to train a robust prediction model. Then, we go further to build an aggregate development index at the district-level, on the lines of the Human Development Index (HDI) and demonstrate high accuracy in predicting the index based on satellite data for different years. This can be used to build applications to guide data-driven policy making at fine spatial and temporal scales, without the need to conduct frequent expensive censuses and surveys on the ground.

References

  1. 2019. Census of India Website: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. http://censusindia.gov.in/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. NITI Aayog. 2018. SDG India Index Baseline Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Saikat Basu, Sangram Ganguly, Supratik Mukhopadhyay, Robert DiBiano, Manohar Karki, and Ramakrishna Nemani. 2015. Deepsat: a learning framework for satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. ACM, 37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Frank Bickenbach, Eckhardt Bode, Peter Nunnenkamp, and Mareike Söder. 2016. Night lights and regional GDP. Review of World Economics 152, 2 (2016), 425--447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gyanesh Chander, Brian L Markham, and Dennis L Helder. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote sensing of environment 113, 5 (2009), 893--903.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C Chandramouli and Registrar General. 2011. Census of India 2011. Provisional Population Totals. New Delhi: Government of India (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nitesh V Chawla, Kevin W Bowyer, Lawrence O Hall, and W Philip Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research 16 (2002), 321--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 785--794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xi Chen and William D Nordhaus. 2010. The value of luminosity data as a proxy for economic statistics. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhaoxin Dai, Yunfeng Hu, and Guanhua Zhao. 2017. The suitability of different nighttime light data for GDP estimation at different spatial scales and regional levels. Sustainability 9, 2 (2017), 305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dave Donaldson and Adam Storeygard. 2016. The view from above: Applications of satellite data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30, 4 (2016), 171--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eugenie Dugoua, Ryan Kennedy, and Johannes Urpelainen. 2018. Satellite data for the social sciences: measuring rural electrification with night-time lights. International journal of remote sensing 39, 9 (2018), 2690--2701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Christopher D Elvidge, Kimberly E Baugh, Sharolyn J Anderson, Paul C Sutton, and Tilottama Ghosh. 2012. The Night Light Development Index (NLDI): a spatially explicit measure of human development from satellite data. Social Geography 7, 1 (2012), 23--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Swetava Ganguli, Jared Dunnmon, and Darren Hau. 2016. Predicting food security outcomes using cnns for satellite tasking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bardan Ghimire, John Rogan, Víctor Rodríguez Galiano, Prajjwal Panday, and Neeti Neeti. 2012. An evaluation of bagging, boosting, and random forests for land-cover classification in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. GIScience & Remote Sensing 49, 5 (2012), 623--643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Giorgia Giovannetti, Elena Perra, et al. 2019. Syria in the Dark: Estimating the Economic Consequences of the Civil War through Satellite-Derived Night Time Lights. Technical Report. Universita'degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e âĂę.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ran Goldblatt, Alexis Rivera Ballesteros, and Jennifer Burney. 2017. High Spatial Resolution Visual Band Imagery Outperforms Medium Resolution Spectral Imagery for Ecosystem Assessment in the Semi-Arid Brazilian Sertão. Remote Sensing 9, 12 (2017), 1336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Google. 2019. Landsat Algorithms. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/landsatGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dibyajyoti Goswami, Shyam Bihari Tripathi, Sansiddh Jain, Shivam Pathak, and Aaditeshwar Seth. 2019. Towards Building a District Development Model for India Using Census Data. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrew Head, Mélanie Manguin, Nhat Tran, and Joshua E Blumenstock. 2017. Can Human Development be Measured with Satellite Imagery?. In ICTD. 8--1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Patrick Helber, Benjamin Bischke, Andreas Dengel, and Damian Borth. 2017. Eurosat: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.00029 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J Vernon Henderson, Adam Storeygard, and David N Weil. 2012. Measuring economic growth from outer space. American economic review 102, 2 (2012), 994--1028.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tengyun Hu, Jun Yang, Xuecao Li, and Peng Gong. 2016. Mapping urban land use by using landsat images and open social data. Remote Sensing 8, 2 (2016), 151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wenjie Hu, Jay Harshadbhai Patel, Zoe-Alanah Robert, Paul Novosad, Samuel Asher, Zhongyi Tang, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2019. Mapping Missing Population in Rural India: A Deep Learning Approach with Satellite Imagery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.02196 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W Matthew Davis, David B Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2016. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353, 6301 (2016), 790--794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. David A Landgrebe. 2005. Signal theory methods in multispectral remote sensing. Vol. 29. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Charlotta Mellander, José Lobo, Kevin Stolarick, and Zara Matheson. 2015. Night-time light data: A good proxy measure for economic activity? PloS one 10, 10 (2015), e0139779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Brian Min and Kwawu Gaba. 2014. Tracking electrification in Vietnam using nighttime lights. Remote Sensing 6, 10 (2014), 9511--9529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Brian Min, Kwawu Mensan Gaba, Ousmane Fall Sarr, and Alassane Agalassou. 2013. Detection of rural electrification in Africa using DMSP-OLS night lights imagery. International journal of remote sensing 34, 22 (2013), 8118--8141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. KN Nischal, Radhika Radhakrishnan, Sanket Mehta, and Sumit Chandani. 2015. Correlating night-time satellite images with poverty and other census data of India and estimating future trends. In Proceedings of the Second ACM IKDD Conference on Data Sciences. ACM, 75--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shailesh M Pandey, Tushar Agarwal, and Narayanan C Krishnan. 2018. Multi-task deep learning for predicting poverty from satellite images. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Anthony Perez, Swetava Ganguli, Stefano Ermon, George Azzari, Marshall Burke, and David Lobell. 2019. Semi-supervised multitask learning on multispectral satellite images using wasserstein generative adversarial networks (gans) for predicting poverty. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.11110 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Anthony Perez, Christopher Yeh, George Azzari, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2017. Poverty prediction with public landsat 7 satellite imagery and machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.03654 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Anupam Prakash, Avdhesh Kumar Shukla, Chaitali Bhowmick, and Robert Carl Michael Beyer. 2019. Night-time Luminosity: Does it Brighten Understanding of Economic Activity in India? (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. United Nations Development Programme. 2019. Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Caleb Robinson, Fred Hohman, and Bistra Dilkina. 2017. A deep learning approach for population estimation from satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities. ACM, 47--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hans Rosling. 2019. Factfulness. Flammarion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. SP Subash, Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, and KS Aditya. 2018. Satellite data and machine learning tools for predicting poverty in rural India. Agricultural Economics Research Review 31, 347-2019-571 (2018), 231--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Potnuru Kishen Suraj, Ankesh Gupta, Makkunda Sharma, Sourabh Bikash Paul, and Subhashis Banerjee. 2017. On monitoring development using high resolution satellite images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.02282 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Binh Tang, Ying Sun, Yanyan Liu, and David S Matteson. 2018. Dynamic Poverty Prediction with Vegetation Index. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. USGS. 2019. Landsat Missions. https://www.usgs.gov/land-resources/nli/landsat/landsat-7?qt-science_support_page_related_con=0#qt-science_support_page_related_conGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. USGS/Google. 2019. USGS Landsat 7 Collection 1 Tier 1 and Real-Time data TOA Reflectance. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/LANDSAT_LE07_C01_T1_RT_TOAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Gary R Watmough, Peter M Atkinson, Arupjyoti Saikia, and Craig W Hutton. 2016. Understanding the evidence base for poverty--environment relationships using remotely sensed satellite data: an example from Assam, India. World Development 78 (2016), 188--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Michael Xie, Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2016. Transfer learning from deep features for remote sensing and poverty mapping. In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Temporal Prediction of Socio-economic Indicators Using Satellite Imagery

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CoDS COMAD 2020: Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD
        January 2020
        399 pages
        ISBN:9781450377386
        DOI:10.1145/3371158

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 January 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        CoDS COMAD 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate78of275submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate197of680submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader