skip to main content
10.1145/3360901.3364413acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Jointly Learning from Social Media and Environmental Data for Typhoon Intensity Prediction

Published:23 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing technologies employ different machine learning approachesto predict disasters from historical environmental data. However,for short-term disasters (e.g., earthquakes), historical data alonehas a limited prediction capability. In this work, we consider so-cial media as a supplementary source of knowledge in additionto historical environmental data. Further, we build a joint modelthat learns from disaster-related tweets and environmental data toimprove prediction. We propose the combination of semantically-enriched word embedding to represent entities in tweets with theirsemantics representations computed with the traditionalword2vec.Our experiments show that our proposed approach outperformsthe accuracy of state-of-the-art models in disaster prediction

References

  1. Adam Acar and Yuya Muraki. 2011. Twitter for crisis communication: lessons learned from Japan's tsunami disaster. International Journal of Web Based Communities, Vol. 7, 3 (2011), 392--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amrita Anam, Aryya Gangopadhyay, and Nirmalya Roy. 2018. Evaluating Disaster Time-Line from Social Media with Wavelet Analysis. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Grégoire Burel, Hassan Saif, Miriam Fernandez, and Harith Alani. 2017. On semantics and deep learning for event detection in crisis situations. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Deep Learning (SemDeep). ESWC 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Xingyu Chen, Lei Zou, and Bo Zhao. 2019. Detecting Climate Change Deniers on Twitter Using a Deep Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing. ACM, 204--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yury Kryvasheyeu, Haohui Chen, Nick Obradovich, Esteban Moro, Pascal Van Hentenryck, James Fowler, and Manuel Cebrian. 2016. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Science advances, Vol. 2, 3 (2016), e1500779.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Peter M Landwehr and Kathleen M Carley. 2014. Social media in disaster relief. In Data mining and knowledge discovery for big data. Springer, 225--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111--3119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wanli Ouyang and Xiaogang Wang. 2013. Joint deep learning for pedestrian detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hongwei Qin, Junjie Yan, Xiu Li, and Xiaolin Hu. 2016. Joint training of cascaded cnn for face detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3456--3465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jishnu Ray Chowdhury, Cornelia Caragea, and Doina Caragea. 2019. Keyphrase Extraction from Disaster-related Tweets. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 1555--1566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A Reese. 2016. How we'll predict the next natural disaster: Advances in natural hazard forecasting could help keep more people out of harm's way. Discover Magazine, Sep (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 851--860.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Prathusha K Sarma, YIngyu Liang, and William A Sethares. 2018. Domain Adapted Word Embeddings for Improved Sentiment Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04576 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. 2017. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonathan J Tompson, Arjun Jain, Yann LeCun, and Christoph Bregler. 2014. Joint training of a convolutional network and a graphical model for human pose estimation. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1799--1807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Jointly Learning from Social Media and Environmental Data for Typhoon Intensity Prediction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        K-CAP '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture
        September 2019
        281 pages
        ISBN:9781450370080
        DOI:10.1145/3360901
        • General Chairs:
        • Mayank Kejriwal,
        • Pedro Szekely,
        • Program Chair:
        • Raphaël Troncy

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 September 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate55of198submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader