skip to main content
10.1145/335305.335344acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Tight(er) worst-case bounds on dynamic searching and priority queues

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.A. Andersson. Sublogarithmic searching without multiplications. In Proc. 36tn FOGS, pages 655-663, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.A. Andersson. Faster deterministic sorting and searching in linear space. In Proc. 37th FOGS, pages 135-141, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.A. Andersson, P.B. Miltersen, S. Riis, and M. Thorup. Static dictionaries on AC~ RAMs: Query time O(v~og n/log log n)is necessary and sufficient. In Proc. 37ta FOUS, pages 441-450, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.P. Beame and F. Fich. Optimal bounds for the predecessor problem. In Proc. 31st $TOC, pages 295-304, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.G. Brodal. Finger search trees with constant insertion time. In Proc. 9th SODA, pages 540-549. ACM-SIAM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.A. Brodnik, P. B. Miltersen, and I. Munro. Transdichotomous algorithms without multiplication - some upper and lower bounds. In Proc. 5th WADS, LNCS 127~, pages 426-439, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.P.F. Dietz and R. Raman. A constant update time finger search tree. Inf. Proc. Lett., 52:147-154, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.M. L. Fredman and D. E. Willard. Surpassing the information theoretic bound with fusion trees. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 47:424-436, 1993. See also STOC'90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.K. Mehlhorn and S. N~hler. Bounded ordered dictionaries in O(loglog n) time and O(n) space. Inf. Proc. Lett., 35(4):xsa-x89, x990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.M. H. Overmars and C. Levcopoulos. A balanced search tree with O(1) worst-case update time. Acta Informatica, 26:269-277, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.M. Thorup. Randomized sorting in O(nloglogn) time and linear space using addition, shift, and bit-wise boolean operations. In Proc. 8th SODA, pages 352-359, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.M. Thorup. Faster deterministic sorting and priority queues in linear space. In Proc. 9th SODA, pages 550- 555, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.P. van Erode Boas. Preserving order in a forest in less than logarithmic time and linear space. Inf. Proc. Lett., 6(3):80-82, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.P. van Erode Boas, R. Kaas, and E. Zijlstra. Design and implementation of an efficient priority queue. Math. Syst. Theory, 10:99-127, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.D. E. WiUard. Applications of the fusion tree method to computational geometry and searching. In Proc. 3~a SODA, pages 386-395, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tight(er) worst-case bounds on dynamic searching and priority queues

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              STOC '00: Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
              May 2000
              756 pages
              ISBN:1581131844
              DOI:10.1145/335305

              Copyright © 2000 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 May 2000

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              STOC '00 Paper Acceptance Rate85of182submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

              Upcoming Conference

              STOC '24
              56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
              June 24 - 28, 2024
              Vancouver , BC , Canada

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader