skip to main content
10.1145/3341525.3387421acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Developing an Inclusive K-12 Outreach Model

Published:15 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper outlines the longitudinal development of a K-12 outreach model, to promote Computer Science in Ireland. Over a three-year period, it has been piloted to just under 9700 K-12 students from almost every county in Ireland. The model consists of a two-hour camp that introduces students to a range of Computer Science topics: addressing computing perceptions, introduction to coding and exploration of computational thinking. The model incorporates on-site school delivery and is available at no cost to any interested school across Ireland. The pilot study so far collected over 3400 surveys (pre- and post- outreach delivery). Schools from all over Ireland self-selected to participate, including male only, female only and mixed schools. The no-cost nature of the model meant schools deemed "disadvantaged", to private fee-paying schools participated. Initial findings are very positive, including the balance of male and female participants, where in the 2017-18 academic year it was 56:44 and in 2019-20 (to date), it is 35:65 respectively. Once the model is validated and tweaked (based on survey data), the model will be published (open access) for other institutions to implement the model locally. In addition, the authors intend to link schools (that the team have worked with over the three years) with local institutions, thus developing a sustainable ecosystem for the program to continue. This paper describes the model structure and outlines early findings.

References

  1. Brett A. Becker. 2019. A Survey of Introductory Programming Courses in Ireland. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Aberdeen, Scotland Uk) (ITiCSE '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58--64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319752Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brett A. Becker and Keith Quille. 2019. 50 Years of CS1 at SIGCSE: A Review of the Evolution of Introductory Programming Education Research. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338--344. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287432Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CESI. [n.d.]. Computers in Education Society of Ireland - www.cesi.ie.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Valentina Dagien.e and Gerald Futschek. 2008. Bebras International Contest on Informatics and Computer Literacy: Criteria for Good Tasks. In International conference on informatics in secondary schools-evolution and perspectives. Springer, 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Adrienne Decker and Monica M. McGill. 2017. Pre-College Computing Outreach Research: Towards Improving the Practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Seattle, Washington, USA) (SIGCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 153--158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017744Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adrienne Decker, Monica M. McGill, and Amber Settle. 2016. Towards a Common Framework for Evaluating Computing Outreach Activities. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (Memphis, Tennessee, USA) (SIGCSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 627--632. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Katherine Donnelly. 2018. Dramatic Fall in Number of Students Entering Third-level to Study Computing. Irish Independent (Dec 2018). www.independent.ie/irish-news/education/dramatic-fall-in-number-of-students-entering-thirdlevel-to-study-computing-37605169.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mary Anne L. Egan and Timoth Lederman. 2011. The Impact of IMPACT: Assessing Students' Perceptions After a Day of Computer Exploration. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Darmstadt, Germany) (ITiCSE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 318--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999747.1999836Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019 a. An International Benchmark Study of K-12 Computer Science Education in Schools. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Aberdeen, Scotland Uk) (ITiCSE '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 257--258. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3325535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019 c. An International Comparison of K-12 Computer Science Education Intended and Enacted Curricula. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland) (Koli Calling '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019 b. An International Study Piloting the MEasuring TeacheR Enacted Computing Curriculum (METRECC) Instrument. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Aberdeen, Scotland Uk) (ITiCSE-WGR '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111--142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344429.3372505Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Russell Feldhausen, Joshua Levi Weese, and Nathan H. Bean. 2018. Increasing Student Self-Efficacy in Computational Thinking via STEM Outreach Programs. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (SIGCSE '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 302--307. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159593Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniel D. Garcia, Wei Ding, Joseph Cohen, Barbara Ericson, Jeff Gray, and Dale Reed. 2015. One-Day Activities for K-12 Face-to-Face Outreach. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Kansas City, Missouri, USA) (SIGCSE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 520--521. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677337Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alka Harriger, Alejandra J Magana, and Ryan Lovan. 2012. Identifying the impact of the SPIRIT program in student knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward computing careers. In 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Eunjin (EJ) Jung and Xornam S. Apedoe. 2013. Changing Young Women's Perceptions of CS via Outreach. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Canterbury, England, UK) (ITiCSE '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 333--333. https://doi.org/10.1145/2462476.2465616Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahmoud Kaddoura. 2013. Think Pair Share: A Teaching Learning Strategy to Enhance Students' Critical T hinking. Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 36, 4 (2013), 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Shahnaz Kamberi. 2017. Exposing Girls to Computer Science: Does the All-Girl Model Really Work?. In 2017 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 152--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mark Keenan. 2013. Up to 4,500 Jobs Unfilled Due to Skills Shortage in IT. Irish Independent (May 2013). https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/up-to-4500-jobs-unfilled-due-to-skills-shortage-in-it-29289669.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Antti-Jussi Lakanen, Ville Isomöttönen, and Vesa Lappalainen. 2012. Life Two Years After a Game Programming Course: Longitudinal Viewpoints on K-12 Outreach. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) (SIGCSE '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481--486. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Antti-Jussi Lakanen, Ville Isomöttönen, and Vesa Lappalainen. 2014. Five Years of Game Programming Outreach: Understanding Student Differences. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (SIGCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 647--652. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Simon, Ibrahim Albluwi, Brett A. Becker, Michail Giannakos, Amruth N. Kumar, Linda Ott, James Paterson, Michael James Scott, Judy Sheard, and Claudia Szabo. 2018. Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Larnaca, Cyprus) (ITiCSE 2018 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55--106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Catherine Mooney, Brett A Becker, Lana Salmon, and Eleni Mangina. 2018. Computer Science Identity and Sense of Belonging: a Case Study in Ireland. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering. ACM, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Laurie Murphy, Tammy VanDeGrift, Brad Richards, and Brent Wilson. 2005. Models for Computer Science K-12 Outreach Activities. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., Vol. 21, 1 (Oct. 2005), 274--276. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1088791.1088838Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Natasha Nesiba, J Dana-Farley, N Muhyi, J Chen, N Ray, and Enrico Pontelli. 2015. Young Women in Computing: Creating a successful and sustainable pipeline. In 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Karen Nolan, Roisin Faherty, Keith Quille, Brett A. Becker, and Susan Bergin. 2019. CSinc: An Inclusive K-12 Outreach Model. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland) (Koli Calling '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 34, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3366156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vamsi Paruchuri. 2013. Enhancing CS Awareness Among K-12 Students in Central Arkansas. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., Vol. 28, 5 (May 2013), 17--23. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2458569.2458573Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Keith Quille, Natalie Culligan, and Susan Bergin. 2017. Insights on Gender Differences in CS1: A Multi-institutional, Multi-variate Study.. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Bologna, Italy) (ITiCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 263--268. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Keith Quille, Roisin Faherty, Susan Bergin, and Brett A. Becker. 2018. Second Level Computer Science: The Irish K-12 Journey Begins. In Proceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland) (Koli Calling '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279720.3279742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Majd F Sakr, Khaled A Harras, and Mark Stehlik. 2011. Computer What?! Designing Outreach Activities to Introduce Computer Science to K-12 in Qatar. In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 592--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sue Sentance, Jane Waite, and Maria Kallia. 2019. Teaching Computer Programming With PRIMM: a Sociocultural Perspective. Computer Science Education, Vol. 29, 2--3 (2019), 136--176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1608781Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Oireachtas Library & Research Service. 2017. STEM in Schools: The Introduction of Coding and Computer Science/ICT to the Curriculum. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mary Webb, Niki Davis, Tim Bell, Yaacov J Katz, Nicholas Reynolds, Dianne P Chambers, and Maciej M Sysło. 2017. Computer science in K-12 School Curricula of the 2lst Century: Why, What and When? Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 22, 2 (2017), 445--468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Developing an Inclusive K-12 Outreach Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
      June 2020
      615 pages
      ISBN:9781450368742
      DOI:10.1145/3341525

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 June 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader