Amelie Oberhofer
Andreas Riener
ABSTRACT
Smart speakers have recently gained much interest and are expected to get even more attention in the near future. However, not everybody has positive attitudes towards this new technology. In this work, we investigate whether or not the acceptance of smart speakers is dependent on their general "openness" as one personality dimension. We compared "open" persons (early adopter) with non-open persons (laggard) in a Wizard-of-Oz study setting and let our subjects interact with a smart speaker-replica (with both natural and computer-generated voice feedback). As baseline condition, subjects had to carry-out tasks in a traditional way, i. e., without the help of a smart assistant. Our study could not reveal significant effects regarding "openness" and acceptance of smart speakers, but we identified that the design of smart speakers need to be enhanced anyway to achieve a higher acceptance in society.
- Michael Braun, Anja Mainz, Ronee Chadowitz, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2019. At your service: Designing voice assistant personalities to improve automotive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 40. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hyunji Chung, Michaela Iorga, Jeffrey Voas, and Sangjin Lee. 2017. Alexa, Can I Trust You? Computer 50, 9 (2017), 100--104.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Danner, B. Rammstedt, M. Bluemke, L. Treiber, S. Berres, C. Soto, and O. John. Array. Die deutsche Version des Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2). Danner, D., Rammstedt, B., Bluemke, M., Treiber, L., Berres, S., Soto, C., John, O., Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis247Google Scholar
- Fred D Davis, Richard P Bagozzi, and Paul R Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science 35, 8 (1989), 982--1003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fred D Davis and Viswanath Venkatesh. 1996. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 1 (1996), 19--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maartje MA de Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch, and Jan AGM van Dijk. 2017. A phased framework for long-term user acceptance of interactive technology in domestic environments. New Media & Society (2017), 1461444817727264.Google Scholar
- Sarv Devaraj, Robert F Easley, and J Michael Crant. 2008. Research note - how does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information systems research 19, 1 (2008), 93--105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arjan Egges, Sumedha Kshirsagar, and Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann. 2003. A model for personality and emotion simulation. In International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, 453--461.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Franke, Christiane Attig, and Daniel Wessel. 2019. A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2019).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grzegorz Glonek and Maria Pietruszka. 2012. Natural user interfaces (NUI). (2012).Google Scholar
- William Haack, Madeleine Severance, Michael Wallace, and Jeremy Wohlwend. 2017. Security Analysis of the Amazon Echo. (2017).Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2003. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology. Springer, 31--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 187--196.Google Scholar
- Kasper Hornbæk and Morten Hertzum. 2017. Technology acceptance and user experience: a review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 24, 5 (2017), 33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evangelos Karapanos. 2013. User experience over time. In Modeling users' experiences with interactive systems. Springer, 57--83.Google Scholar
- Xinyu Lei, Guan-Hua Tu, Alex X. Liu, Chi-Yu Li, and Tian Xie. 2017. The Insecurity of Home Digital Voice Assistants - Amazon Alexa as a Case Study. CoRR abs/1712.03327 (2017). arXiv:1712.03327 http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03327Google Scholar
- Snyder Mark. 1983. The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behavior. Journal of Personality 51, 3 (1983), 497--516.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa Jr. 1986. Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of personality 54, 2 (1986), 385--404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Shirer, Jitesh Ubrani, Adam Wright. 2018. New IDC Smart Home Device Tracker Forecasts Solid Growth for Connected Devices in Key Smart Home Categories. Retrieved June 6, 2018 from https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS43701518Google Scholar
- Kelly Moore and James C McElroy. 2012. The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1 (2012), 267--274. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Masahiro Mori. 1970. The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 4 (1970), 33--35.Google Scholar
- Gunnvald B Svendsen, Jan-Are K Johnsen, Live Almås-Sørensen, and Joar Vittersø. 2013. Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model. Behaviour & Information Technology 32, 4 (2013), 323--334. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Van Schaik and Jonathan Ling. 2011. An integrated model of interaction experience for information retrieval in a Web-based encyclopaedia. Interacting with Computers 23, 1 (2011), 18--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viswanath Venkatesh. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research 11, 4 (2000), 342--365. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science 46, 2 (2000), 186--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaniv Leviathan. 2018. Google Duplex: An AI System for Accomplishing Real-World Tasks Over the Phone. Retrieved June 6, 2018 from https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.htmlGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- The Influence of User Openness on Acceptance and UX of Smart Speakers
Recommendations
Integrating guanxi into technology acceptance
A research model of continuance intention on mobile social-messaging applications based on guanxi theory is proposed.Partial least squares path modelling was employed to test the proposed hypotheses.Guanxi influences continuance intention, perceived ...
Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics
The information systems (IS) literature has long emphasized the importance of user acceptance of computer-based IS. Evaluating the determinants of acceptance of information technology (IT) is vital to address the problem of underutilization and leverage ...
The acceptance and use of computer based assessment
The effective development of a computer based assessment (CBA) depends on students' acceptance. The purpose of this study is to build a model that demonstrates the constructs that affect students' behavioral intention to use a CBA. The proposed model, ...
Comments