skip to main content
10.1145/3328529.3328558acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reframing Current Debates on Young People's Online Privacy by Taking into Account the Cultural Construction of Youth

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In public discussions regarding online privacy, young people are oftentimes portrayed as individuals who put themselves and others at risk with their naive and reckless online behavior. Recent scholarly work, however, debunked the myth that teenagers do not value privacy anymore by uncovering how they manage sensitive information in their everyday life. In this paper we argue that underlying assumptions of this scholarship still hinder our understanding of youth's engagements with social media and privacy. First, researchers tend to reproduce an image of young people as 'unfinished'. Second, studies fail to account for young people's exposure to technopanic narratives. Finally, the scholarship is oftentimes grounded in a liberal idealization of privacy as something inherently desirable for young people. To critically reflect upon these assumptions, we suggest taking into account the cultural construction of youth. Specifically, we argue that youths' experiences as "beings-in-the-present", society's anxieties about a digital future, and power dynamics might be essential elements that mediate young people's engagements with social media, privacy, and society.

References

  1. danah boyd. 2007. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (eds.), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning -- Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alice E. Marwick. 2008. To catch a predator? The Myspace moral panic. First Monday 13, 6 (June. 2008), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Denise E. Agosto and June Abbas. 2017. "Don't be dumb- that's the rule I try to live by": A closer look at older teens' online privacy and safety attitudes. New Media and Society 19, 3 (September 2015), 347--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. danah boyd. 2014. It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press, New Haven. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sonia Livingstone. 2006. Opportunities and constraints framing children and young people's internet use. In M. Consalvo (Eds.), Internet Research Annual Volume 4. Peter Lang, New York, NY. 59--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Claire Balleys and Sami Coll. 2017. Being publicly intimate: teenagers managing online privacy. Media, Culture and Society 39, 6 (November, 2016), 885--901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gerard Goggin. 2013. Youth Culture and mobiles. Mobile Media and Commun. 1, 1 (January, 2013), 83--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sherry Turkle. 2011. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jean M. Twenge, Gabrielle N. Martin and Keith W. Campbell. 2018. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion 18, 6 (January 2018), 765--780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mary Bucholtz. 2002. Youth and Cultural Practice. Annu. Rev. Anthropol 31, 1 (November 2002), 525--552.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Filip De Boeck and Alcinda Honwana. 2005. Makers & Breakers: children & youth in postcolonial Africa. Currey, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Deborah Durham. 2017. Elusive Adulthoods: Introduction. In D. Durham and J. Solway (eds.), Elusive Adulthoods: The anthropology of new maturities. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sonia Livingstone. 2018. Audiences in an age of datafication: critical questions for media research. Television and New Media 20, 2 (November 2018), 170--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Catrine Christiansen, Mats Utas, and Hendrik E. Vigh. 2006. Navigating Youth, Generating Adulthood: Social Becoming in an African Context. Elanders Gotab AB, Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jennifer Cole and Deborah Durham. 2007. Introduction: Age, Regeneration and the Intimate Politics of Globalization. In J. Cole and D. Durham (eds.), Generations and globalizations: youth, age, and family in the new world economy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. John Comaroff and Jean Comaroff. 2005. Children & Youth in a global era. In F. De Boeck and A. Honwana (eds.), Makers & Breakers: Children & Youth in postcolonial Africa. Currey, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Scott W. Campbell and Yong Jin Park. 2008. Social Implications of Mobile Telephony: The Rise of Personal Communication Society. Sociology Compass 2, 2 (March 2008), 371--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Eija-Liisa Kasesniemi and Pirjo Rautiainen. 2002. Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In J. E. Katz and M. Aakhus (eds.), Perpetual contact. Mobile communication private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mariek M. P. Vanden Abeele (2012). Me, myself, and my mobile phone. Status, identity and belongingness in mobile youth culture. Ph.D dissertation, KUL, Leuven, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mariek M. P. Vanden Abeele. 2016. Mobile youth culture: A conceptual development. Mobile Media & Commun. 4, 1 (August 2015), 85--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Manuel Castells, Mireira Fernandez-Ardevol, Jack Linchuan Qiu and Araba Sey. 2007. Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rich Ling. 2010. Texting as a life phase phenomenon. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15 (January 2010), 277--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zheng Yan. 2018. Child and Adolescent Use of Mobile Phones: An Unparalleled Complex Developmental Phenomenon. Child Development 89, 1 (May 2017), 5--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Alice E. Marwick and Danah boyd. 2014. Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society 16, 17 (July 2014), 1051--1067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Danah boyd and Esther Hargittai. 2010. Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday 15, 8 (August 2010), 265--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ralf De Wolf, Koen Willaert and Jo Pierson. 2014. Managing privacy boundaries together: Exploring individual and group privacy management strategies in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 35 (June 2014), 444--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ralf De Wolf. 2016. Group privacy management strategies and challenges in Facebook: A focus group study among Flemish youth organizations. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial research on Cyberspace 10, 1, article 5, 16 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Emily Christofides, Amy Muise and Serge Desmarais. 2009. Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 3 (June 2009), 341--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kate Raynes-Goldie. 2010. Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday 15, 1 (January 2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Denise Anthony, Celeste Campos-Castillo and Christine Horne. 2017. Toward a Sociology of Privacy. Annu Rev. Sociol., 43, 17, 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Christian Fuchs. 2011. Towards an alternative concept of privacy. Journal of Information, Commun. and Ethics in Society 9, 4 (September 2011), 220--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Richard Wilk. 2018. Internet Privacy Hogwash. Anthropology News (May 2018). Retrieved August 20, 2018 from http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2018/05/30/internet-privacy-hogwash/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mariek M.P. Vanden Abeele, Ralf De Wolf and Rich Ling. 2018. Mobile media and social space: how anytime, anyplace connectivity structures everyday life. Media and Commun. 6, 2 (May 2018), 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Alice E. Marwick and Danah boyd. 2011. I Tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society 13, 1 (July 2010), 114--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jessica Vitak. 2012. The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 4 (December 2012), 451--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Annette N. Markham. 2013. Remix culture, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts. In N. Denzin and M. Giardina (eds.), Global Dimensions of qualitative Inquiry. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Susan Barnes. 2006. A Privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday 11, 9 (September 2006), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jose Van Dijck. 2014. Datafication, dataism and dataveilance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12, 2 (May 2014), 197--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yahuda. 1994. Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. W. James Potter. 2013. Review of Literature on Media Literacy. Sociology Compass 7, 6 (June 2013), 417--435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Leo Van Audenhove, Ilse Mariën and Hadewijch Vanwynsberghe. 2018. Media Literacy Policy in Flanders Belgium: From Parliamentary Discussions to Public Policy. Journal of Media Literacy Education 10, 1 (January 2018), 59--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Lucy L. Henke. 1999. Children, advertising, and the Internet: An exploratory study. In D. W Schumann and Esther Thorson (eds.), Advertising and the World Wide Web. Psychology Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. John Palfrey and Urs Gasser. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Perseus Books Group, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Seounmi Youn. 2005. Teenagers' perceptions of online privacy and coping behaviors: a risk-benefit appraisal approach. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49, 1 (June 2010), 86--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Seounmi. Youn. 2009. Determinants of Online Privacy concern and Its Influence on Privacy Protection Behaviors Among Young Adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs 43, 3 (September 2009), 389--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. New York Magazine. 2018. Kids, the Internet, and the End of Privacy. Retrieved December 2018 from: http://nymag.com/news/features/27341/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Paul Hodkinson. 2017. Bedrooms and beyond: Youth, identity and privacy on social network sites. New media & society 19, 2 (September 2015), 272--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Bridgette Wessels. 2012. Identification and the practices of identity and privacy in everyday digital communication. New media & society 14, 8 (July 2012), 1251--1268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Grant Blank, Gillian Bolsover and Elizabeth Dubois. 2014. A New Privacy Paradox: Young people and privacy on social network sites. Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre: Draft Working Paper. (August 2014), 34 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Irwin Altman. 1975. The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Sandra Petronio. 2002. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Caroline Lancelot Miltgen and Dominique Peyrat-Guillard. 2014. Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countries. European Journal of Information Systems 23, 2 (March 2014), 103--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Alyson Leigh Young and Anabel Quan-Haase. 2013. Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Commun. & Society 16, 4 (April 2013), 479--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Petter Bae Brandtzaeg, Marika Lüders and Jan Havard Skjetne. 2010. Too Many Facebook "Friends"? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26, 11-12 (November 2010), 1006--1030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Reyman Rob, Ralf De Wolf and Pierson Jo. 2014. Evaluating social media privacy settings for personal and advertising purposes. Info 16, 4, 18--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Alcinda Honwana. 2012. The time of youth: work, social change and politics in Africa. Kumarian Press, Sterling, Virgina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Sunaina Maira and Elisabeth Soep. 2005. Youthscapes: The popular, the national,the global. Penn Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Julian Sefton-Green. 1998. Introduction: Being young in the digital age. In J. Sefton-Green (eds.), Digital diversions: Youth culture in the age of multimedia. University College London Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Mizuko Ito and Daisuke Okabe. 2005. Intimate Connections: Contextualizing Japanese youth and mobile messaging. In: R. Harper, L. Palen, and A. Taylor (eds.), The Inside Text. The Kluwer international series on computer supported cooperative work (vol. 4). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Gerard Goggin and Kate Crawford. 2011. Generation disconnections: Youth culture and mobile communication. In R. Ling and S. W. Campbell (eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together or tearing us apart?. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Alice Marwick and Danah Body. 2018. Understanding Privacy at the Margins: Introduction. International Journal of Commun. 12, (February 2018), 1157--1165. DOI: 1932--8036/20180005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Payal Arora and Laura Scheiber. 2017. Slumdog romance: Facebook love and digital privacy at the margins. Media, Culture & Society 39, 3 (April 2017), 408--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Elisabetta Locatelli. 2017. Images of Breastfeeding on Instagram: Self-Representation, Publicness, and Privacy Management. Social Media + Society, (May 2017), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Lara Fulenwieder and Adam Molnar. 2018. Settler governance and privacy: Canada's Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement and the mediation of state-based violence. International Journal of Commun., 12, (February 2018), 1332--1349. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7042Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Ellie Rennie, Tyson Yunkaporta and Indigo Hocombe-James. 2018. Privacy Versus Relatedness: Managing Device Use in Australia's Remote Aboriginal Communities. International Journal of Commun., 12, (February 2018), 1291--1309. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7051/2299Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Alice Marwick, Diego Murgia Diaz and John Palfrey. 2010. Youth, Privacy and Reputation: Literature Review. Berkman center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, (March 2010), 82 pages. Retrieved February 8, 2019 from https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/files/YouthPrivacyReputationBERKMAN.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Helena Wulff. 1995. Introducing youth culture in its own right: the state of the art and new possibilities. In H. Wulff and A. T. Vered (eds.), Youth Cultures: a cross-cultural perspective. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Petter B. Brandtzaeg and Marika Lüders. 2018. Time Collapse in Social Media: Extending the Context Collapse. Social Media + Society, (March 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Susan C. Herring. 2008. Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult construction of online youth identity. In D. Buckingham (eds.), Youth, identity, and digital media. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Fenshu, Liu. 2010. The norm of the 'good' netizen and the construction of the 'proper' wired self: The case of Chinese urban youth. New media & society 13, 1 (May 2010), 7--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Harry Blatterer. 2010. The Changing Semantics of Youth and Adulthood. Cultural Sociology 4, 1 (March, 2010), 63--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Sabine Kurtenbach. 2014. Postwar Violence in Guatemala: A mirror of the Relationship between Youth and Adult Society. Int. Journal of Conflict and Violence 8, 1, 119--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Michael Herzfeld. 2014. Serendipitous Sculpture: Ethnography does as Ethnography goes. Anthropology and Humanism 39, 1 (June 2014), 3--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reframing Current Debates on Young People's Online Privacy by Taking into Account the Cultural Construction of Youth

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SMSociety '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society
      July 2019
      247 pages
      ISBN:9781450366519
      DOI:10.1145/3328529

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 July 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader