skip to main content
10.1145/3322276.3322286acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Sensing is Believing: What People Think Biosensors Can Reveal About Thoughts and Feelings

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Biosensors-devices that sense the human body-are increasingly ubiquitous. However, it is unclear how people evaluate the risks associated with their use, in part because it is not well-understood what people believe these sensors can reveal. In this study, participants ranked biosensors by how likely they are to reveal what a person is thinking and feeling. We report quantitative and qualitative results of two survey-based studies, one on Mechanical Turk workers (n=100), and one on participants in a longitudinal self-tracking study (n=100). Our findings imply that, in the absence of information about particular sensing technologies, people rely on existing beliefs about the body to explain what they might reveal. Highlighting mismatches between perceived and actual technical capabilities, we contribute recommendations for designers and users.

References

  1. Madeleine Akrich. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects . In Shaping technologybuilding society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sabrina S Ali, Michael Lifshitz, and Amir Raz. 2014. Empirical neuroenchantment: from reading minds to thinking critically. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8, May (may 2014), 357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Luca Canzian and Mirco Musolesi. 2015. Trajectories of depression. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UBICOMP '15). 1293--1304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sunny Consolvo, Ian E. Smith, Tara Matthews, Anthony LaMarca, Jason Tabert, and Pauline Powledge. 2005. Location disclosure to social relations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '05. ACM Press, 81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sophie Day and Celia Lury. 2016. Biosensing: Tracking Persons . Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life (2016), 43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joseph Dumit. 2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity . Information Series (2004), 251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. We Are Dynamo. 2018. Guidelines for Academic Requesters. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Deborah Estrin and Ida Sim. 2010. Health care delivery. Open mHealth architecture: an engine for health care innovation. PLoS Medicine 10, 2 (2010), e10011395.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jé ré my Frey, Renaud Gervais, Sté phanie Fleck, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2014. Teegi: tangible EEG interface. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '14. ACM, Honolulu, É tats-Unis, 301--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Donna Jeanne Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective . Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tad Hirsch, Aaron Dembe, Christina Soma, Derek D Caperton, and David C Atkins. 2018. "It's hard to argue with a computer:" Investigating Psychotherapists' Attitudes towards Automated Evaluation . (2018), 559--571.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jason I. Hong, Jennifer D. Ng, Scott Lederer, and James A. Landay. 2004. Privacy risk models for designing privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing systems . Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS '04 (2004), 91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Noura Howell, John Chuang, Abigail De Kosnik, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2018. Emotional Biosensing: Exploring Critical Alternatives. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 69 (Nov. 2018), 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Noura Howell, Laura Devendorf, Rundong Kevin Tian, Tomá s Vega Galvez, Nan-wei Gong, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, Kimiko Ryokai, and U C Berkeley. 2016. Biosignals as Social Cues : Ambiguity and Emotional Interpretation in Social Displays of Skin Conductance (DIS '16). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Scott R Klemmer, Bjö rn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How Bodies Matter : Five Themes for Interaction Design . Designing Interactive Systems (2006), 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lucian Leahu and Phoebe Sengers. 2014. Freaky: performing hybrid human-machine emotion . In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing interactive Systems (DIS '14). 607--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ilaria Liccardi, Alfie Abdul-Rahman, and Min Chen. 2016. I Know Where You Live: Inferring Details of People's Lives by Visualizing Publicly Shared Location Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Andrew Liptak. 2016. There Are Some Super Shady Things in Oculus Rift's Terms of Service . Gizmodo (2016). http://gizmodo.com/there-are-some-super-shady-things-in-oculus-rifts-terms-1768678169Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nick Merrill and Coye Cheshire. 2017. Trust Your Heart: Assessing Cooperation and Trust with Biosignals in Computer-Mediated Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '17). Portland, OR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nick Merrill and John Chuang. 2018. From Scanning Brains to Reading Minds: Talking to Engineers about Brain-Computer Interface. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI '18). Montreal, QC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Cade Metz. 2017. Facebook's Race to Link Your Brain to a Computer Might Be Unwinnable . Wired (apr 2017). https://www.wired.com/2017/04/facebooks-race-link-brain-computer-might-unwinnable/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. David Mohr, Mi Zhang, and Stephen M. Schueller. 2017. Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning . SSRN 13 (2017), 23--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dawn Nafus. 2016. Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life . MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dawn Nafus and Jaime Sherman. 2014. This One Does Not Go Up to 11 : The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice . International Journal of Communication 8 (2014), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucas Nolan and Dave C. 2017. Comment on "Facebook Working on Brain-Computer Interface to Translate Thoughts to Text" . Breitbart (apr 2017). http://disq.us/p/1i7l4dvGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. James Pierce, Sarah Fox, Nick Merrill, Richmond Wong, and Carl DiSalvo. 2018a. An Interface without A User: An Exploratory Design Study of Online Privacy Policies and Digital Legalese. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, Hong Kong, PRC, 1345--1358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. James Pierce, Nick Merrill, Richmond Y Wong, Sarah Fox, and Eric Paulos. 2018b. An Interface without A User : An Exploratory Design Study of Online Privacy Policies and Digital Legalese . (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Aare Puussaar, Adrian K. Clear, and Peter Wright. 2017. Enhancing Personal Informatics Through Social Sensemaking . Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17 (2017), 6936--6942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Emilee Rader and Janine Slaker. 2017. The Importance of Visibility for Folk Theories of Sensor Data. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nikolas Rose. 2016. Reading the human brain: How the mind became legible . Body & Society 22, 2 (jun 2016), 140--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Minna Ruckenstein. 2014. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles . Societies (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Elaine Sedenberg, Richmond Y Wong, and John C.-I. Chuang. 2017. A Window into the Soul: Biosensing in Public . CoRR abs/1702.0 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.04235Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucy Suchman. 2015. Situational awareness: Deadly bioconvergence at the boundaries of bodies and machines . MediaTropes 5, 1 (2015), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Peter Tolmie, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James A Colley, and Ewa A Luger. 2016. "This has to be the cats": Personal Data Legibility in Networked Sensing Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16. 490--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Dominique Trottier, Patrice Renaud, Joanne Lucine Rouleau, Mathieu Goyette, Chantal Saumur, Tarik Boukhalfi, and Sté phane Bouchard. 2015. Erratum to: Using immersive virtual reality and anatomically correct computer-generated characters in the forensic assessment of deviant sexual preferences {Virtual Reality, (2014), 18, 37--47. Virtual Reality 19, 3--4 (2015), 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-015-0277--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tim Urban. 2017. Neuralink and the Brain's Magical Future. (2017). https://waitbutwhy.com/2017/04/neuralink.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Janet Vertesi, Jofish Kaye, Samantha N. Jarosewski, Vera D. Khovanskaya, and Jenna Song. 2016. Data Narratives: uncovering tensions in personal data management . Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16 27 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Robert S Weiss. 1995. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies . Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Gary Wolf. 2010. The Data-Driven Life. (apr 2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sensing is Believing: What People Think Biosensors Can Reveal About Thoughts and Feelings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2019
      1628 pages
      ISBN:9781450358507
      DOI:10.1145/3322276

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate105of415submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader