skip to main content
10.1145/3320435.3323466acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards an Exhaustive Framework for Online Social Networks User Behaviour Modelling

Published:07 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since the advent of Web 2.0, Online Social Networks (OSNs) represent a rich opportunity for researchers to collect real user data and to explore OSNs user behaviour. Based on the current challenges and future directions proposed in literature, we aim to investigate how to comprehensively model OSNs user behaviours, by exploiting and combining user data of different nature. We propose to use hypergraphs as a model to easily analyse and combine structural, semantic, and activity-related user information, and to study their evolution over time. This novel user behaviour modelling technique will converge in open, efficient, and scalable libraries, which will be integrated into a modular framework able to handle the data crawling process from several OSNs.

References

  1. A. Abdel-Hafez and Y. Xu. 2013. A survey of user modelling in social media websites. Computer and Information Science, Vol. 6, 4 (2013), 59--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. I. Adaji, K. Oyibo, and J. Vassileva. 2018. The Effect of Gender and Age on the Factors That Influence Healthy Shopping Habits in E-Commerce. In 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 251--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Amato, L. Barolli, V. Moscato, A. Picariello, and G. Sperlì. 2018. Strategies for Social Networks Modeling. In International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops. 681--686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Amato, V. Moscato, A. Picariello, F. Piccialli, and G. Sperlí. 2018. Centrality in heterogeneous social networks for lurkers detection: An approach based on hypergraphs. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Vol. 30, 3 (2018), 41--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Antelmi, D. Malandrino, and V. Scarano. 2018. Characterizing Twitter Users: What do Samantha Cristoforetti, Barack Obama and Britney Spears Have in Common?. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data . 3622--3627.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Antelmi, D. Malandrino, and V. Scarano. 2019. Characterizing the Behavioral Evolution of Twitter Users and The Truth Behind the 90--9--1 Rule. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2019 . Accepted.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, M. Cha, and V. Almeida. 2009. Characterizing User Behavior in Online Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Bretto. 2013. Hypergraph Theory: An Introduction .Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Bu, S. Tan, C. Chen, C. Wang, H. Wu, L. Zhang, and X. He. 2010. Music Recommendation by Unified Hypergraph: Combining Social Media Information and Music Content. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 391--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Caliò, R. Interdonato, C. Pulice, and A. Tagarelli. 2018. Topology-Driven Diversity for Targeted Influence Maximization with Application to User Engagement in Social Networks. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 30, 12 (2018), 2421--2434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Cufoglu. 2014. User Profiling - A Short Review. International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 108, 3 (2014), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Delic, J. Masthoff, J. Neidhardt, and H. Werthner. 2018. How to Use Social Relationships in Group Recommenders: Empirical Evidence. In 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Q. Fang, J. Sang, C. Xu, and Y. Rui. 2014. Topic-Sensitive Influencer Mining in Interest-Based Social Media Networks via Hypergraph Learning. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 16, 3 (2014), 796--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Giammarino, D. Feltoni Gurini, A. Micarelli, and G. Sansonetti. 2017. Social Recommendation with Time and Sentiment Analysis. In 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 376--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Halfaker, O. Keyes, D. Kluver, J. Thebault-Spieker, T. Nguyen, K. Shores, A. Uduwage, and M. Warncke-Wang. 2015. User Session Identification Based on Strong Regularities in Inter-activity Time. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. 410--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Hecking, V. Dimitrova, A. Mitrovic, and U. Ulrich Hoppe. 2017. Using Network-Text Analysis to Characterise Learner Engagement in Active Video Watching., bibinfonumpages326--335 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Jin, Y. Chen, T. Wang, P. Hui, and A. V. Vasilakos. 2013. Understanding user behavior in online social networks: a survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 51, 9 (2013), 144--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S. Mac Kim, S. Wan, and C. Paris. {n. d.}. Detecting social roles in twitter. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2016). 34--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. Li and T. Li. 2013. News Recommendation via Hypergraph Learning: Encapsulation of User Behavior and News Content. In ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Musto, G. Semeraro, P. Lops, and M. de Gemmis. 2015. CrowdPulse: A framework for real-time semantic analysis of social streams. Information Systems, Vol. 54 (2015), 127 -- 146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Papadopoulos and Y. Kompatsiaris. 2014. Social Multimedia Crawling for Mining and Search. Computer, Vol. 47, 5 (2014), 84--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Piao and J. G. Breslin. 2018. Inferring user interests in microblogging social networks: a survey. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 28, 3 (2018), 277--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. V. Pourheidari, E. S. Mollashahi, J. Vassileva, and R. Deters. 2018. Recommender System based on Extracted Data from Different Social Media. A Study of Twitter and LinkedIn. In 2018 IEEE 9th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) . 215--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Salampasis, G. Paltoglou, and A. Giahanou. 2011. Using Social Media for Continuous Monitoring and Mining of Consumer Behaviour. IJEB, Vol. 11 (2011), 85--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. Schiaffino and A. Amandi. 2009. Intelligent User Profiling .Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 193--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Silva and R. Willett. 2008. Detection of anomalous meetings in a social network. In 2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 636--641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. G. Silvestri, J. Yang, A. Bozzon, and A. Tagarelli. 2015. Linking Accounts across Social Networks: the Case of StackOverflow, Github and Twitter. In KDWeb . 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Skowron, M. Tkalvcivc, B. Ferwerda, and M. Schedl. 2016. Fusing Social Media Cues: Personality Prediction from Twitter and Instagram. In International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 107--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Tagarelli and R. Interdonato. 2015. Time-aware analysis and ranking of lurkers in social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining, Vol. 5, 1 (11 Aug 2015), 46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Y. Xu, D. Zhou, and S. Lawless. 2017. User Expertise Inference on Twitter: Learning from Multiple Types of User Data. In 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 395--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. W. Yang, J. Yuan, W. Wu, J. Ma, and D. Du. 2019. Maximizing Activity Profit in Social Networks. IEEE Trans. on Comp. Social Systems, Vol. 6, 1 (2019), 117--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. X. Zhou, Y. Xu, Y. Li, A. Josang, and C. Cox. 2012. The state-of-the-art in personalized recommender systems for social networking. Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 37, 2 (2012), 119--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards an Exhaustive Framework for Online Social Networks User Behaviour Modelling
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              UMAP '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
              June 2019
              377 pages
              ISBN:9781450360210
              DOI:10.1145/3320435

              Copyright © 2019 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 7 June 2019

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              UMAP '19 Paper Acceptance Rate30of122submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

              Upcoming Conference

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader