Carlos Jensen
ABSTRACT
One of the most robust findings in the sociological literature is the positive effect of communication on cooperation and trust. When individuals are able to communicate, cooperation increases significantly. How does the choice of communication modality influence this effect? We adapt the social dilemma research paradigm to quantitatively analyze different modes of communication. Using this method, we compare four forms of communication: no communication, text-chat, text-to-speech, and voice. We found statistically significant differences between different forms of communication, with the voice condition resulting in the highest levels of cooperation. Our results highlight the importance of striving towards the use of more immediate forms of communication in online environments, especially where trust and cooperation are essential. In addition, our research demonstrates the applicability of the social dilemma paradigm in testing the extent to which communication modalities promote the development of trust and cooperation.
- 1.Abela, A., and Sacconaghi, A., Value Exchange: The Secret of Building Customer Relationships On Line. The McKinsey Quarterly 1997, Number 2Google Scholar
- 2.Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, 1984Google Scholar
- 3.Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N. & Weeks, G.D. Studies in interactive communication: The behavior of teams during co-operative problem solving. Human Factors, 14. (1972). 487-509.Google Scholar
- 4.Doherty-Sneedon, G., Anderson, A., O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S., & Bruce, V. Face-to-Face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialog structure and task performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 2, (1997). 105- 123.Google Scholar
- 5.Edigo, C. Teleconferencing as a technology to support co-operative work: Its possibilities and limitations. In J. Gallegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Edigo (Eds.) Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 351-371). Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum Associates Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Finn, K., Sellen, A., Wilbur, S. (Eds.) Video-Mediated Communication. (1997) Hillsdale, NJ. Eribaum Associates Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Kelly, H. Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978Google Scholar
- 8.Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. and Waters, K. A Prisoner's Dilemma Experiment on Cooperation With People and Human-Like Computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996. Vol. 70, No 1, 47-65Google Scholar
- 9.Kollock, P. Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology 1998. 24:183- 214Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Ledyard, J. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In Kagel, J. and Roth, A. (Eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995Google Scholar
- 11.Messick, D and Brewer, M. Solving Social Dilemmas. In Wheeler, L. and Shaver, P. (Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1983Google Scholar
- 12.Rocco, E. Trust Breaks Down in Electronic Contexts but Can Be Repaired by Some Initial Face-to-Face Contact. Proceedings of CHl '98 (Los Angeles CA, April 1998), ACM Press, 496-502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Ruhleder, K., Jorden, B. Meaning-making across remote sites" how delays in transmission affect interaction. Proceedings of 1999 European Conference on CSCW. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Sally, D. Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7,58-92, 1995Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.Veinott, E. S., Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Fu, X. Video Helps Remote Work: Speakers Who Need to Negotiate Common Ground Benefit from Seeing Eachother. Proceedings of CHI '99 (Pittsburgh PA, May 1999), ACM Press, 302-309. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Veinott, E. S., Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Fu, X. Video Matters! When communication is stressed video Helps. Extended Abstracts of CHI '97 (Atlanta GA, April 1997) ACM Press, 315-316. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments
Recommendations
Collaboard: a remote collaboration groupware device featuring an embodiment-enriched shared workspace
GROUP '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkIn this paper we present a mixed presence groupware device called "CollaBoard". The device improves collaboration between co-located and remote partners by providing a high level of workspace awareness. This is achieved by superimposing a life-size ...
Exploring the workplace communication ecology
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe modern workplace is inherently collaborative, and this collaboration relies on effective communication among co-workers. Many communication tools -- email, blogs, wikis, Twitter, etc. -- have become increasingly available and accepted in workplace ...
The influence of computer mediated communication on social capital: a disaggregated approach
GROUP '07: Doctoral Consortium Papers of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkIn a work environment that is dominated by distributed work, virtual teams, and knowledge sharing, social capital enabled by computer mediated communication (CMC) has become a critically important, but increasingly more difficult resource for ...
Comments