skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313401acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Spatio-Temporal Capsule-based Reinforcement Learning for Mobility-on-Demand Network Coordination

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As an alternative means of convenient and smart transportation, mobility-on-demand (MOD), typified by online ride-sharing and connected taxicabs, has been rapidly growing and spreading worldwide. The large volume of complex traffic and the uncertainty of market supplies/demands have made it essential for many MOD service providers to proactively dispatch vehicles towards ride-seekers.

To meet this need effectively, we propose STRide, an MOD coordination-learning mechanism reinforced spatio-temporally with capsules. We formalize the adaptive coordination of vehicles into a reinforcement learning framework. STRide incorporates spatial and temporal distributions of supplies (vehicles) and demands (ride requests), customers' preferences and other external factors. A novel spatio-temporal capsule neural network is designed to predict the provider's rewards based on MOD network states, vehicles and their dispatch actions. This way, the MOD platform adapts itself to the supply-demand dynamics with the best potential rewards. We have conducted extensive data analytics and experimental evaluation with three large-scale datasets (~ 21 million rides from Uber, Yellow Taxis and Didi). STRide is shown to outperform state-of-the-arts, substantially reducing request-rejection rate and passenger waiting time, and also increasing the service provider's profits, often making 30% improvement over state-of-the-arts.

References

  1. 2018. Global Petrol Prices. https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/gasoline_prices/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. National Centers for Environmental Information, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) - Data Tools: Local Climatological Data (LCD). https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/lcd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2018. Open Street Map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2018. TLC Trip Record Data. http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/html/about/trip_record_ data.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2018. Uber pickups in New York City.https://www.kaggle.com/fivethirtyeight/uber-pickups-in-new-york-city/data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2019. Didi Chuxing Technology Co.www.didiglobal.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Niels Agatz, Alan Erera, Martin Savelsbergh, and Xing Wang. 2012. Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. European Journal of Operational Research 223, 2 (2012), 295 - 303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Siddhartha Banerjee, Ramesh Johari, and Carlos Riquelme. 2015. Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach. In Proc. ACM EC. 639-639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Qingpeng Cai, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Pingzhong Tang, and Yiwei Zhang. 2018. Reinforcement Mechanism Design for e-Commerce. In Proc. WWW. 1339-1348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rachel Dovey. 2017. 5 Florida Cities Team Up to Subsidize Uber Rides. https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/five-florida-cities-subsidize-uber-rides.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhixuan Fang, Longbo Huang, and Adam Wierman. 2017. Prices and Subsidies in the Sharing Economy. In Proc. WWW. 53-62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yong Gao, Dan Jiang, and Yan Xu. 2018. Optimize taxi driving strategies based on reinforcement learning. IJGIS 32, 8 (2018), 1677-1696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Deep Learning. Vol. 1. MIT Press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jiawei Han, Jian Pei, and Micheline Kamber. 2011. Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Elsevier. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Suining He and Kang G. Shin. 2018. (Re)Configuring Bike Station Network via Crowdsourced Information Fusion and Joint Optimization. In Proc. ACM MobiHoc. 1-10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Geoffrey E Hinton, Sara Sabour, and Nicholas Frosst. 2018. Matrix capsules with EM routing. In Proc. ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Josh Horwitz. 2017. One year after the Uber-Didi merger, it's only getting harder to hail a ride in China. Respondent: https://qz.com/1045268/one-year-after-the-uber-didi-merger-its-only-getting-harder-to-hail-a-ride-in-china/and waiting time: http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2017-07-26/doc-ifyinryq6222913.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yaguang Li, Kun Fu, Zheng Wang, Cyrus Shahabi, Jieping Ye, and Yan Liu. 2018. Multi-task Representation Learning for Travel Time Estimation. In Proc. ACM KDD. 1695-1704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yaguang Li, Han Su, Ugur Demiryurek, Bolong Zheng, Tieke He, and Cyrus Shahabi. 2017. PaRE: A System for Personalized Route Guidance. In Proc. WWW. 637-646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yexin Li, Yu Zheng, and Qiang Yang. 2018. Dynamic Bike Reposition: A Spatio-Temporal Reinforcement Learning Approach. In Proc. ACM KDD. 1724-1733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kaixiang Lin, Renyu Zhao, Zhe Xu, and Jiayu Zhou. 2018. Efficient Large-Scale Fleet Management via Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proc. ACM KDD. 1774-1783. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Zhidan Liu, Zhenjiang Li, Kaishun Wu, and Mo Li. 2018. Urban Traffic Prediction from Mobility Data Using Deep Learning. IEEE Network 32, 4 (July 2018), 40-46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chenglin Miao, Qi Li, Lu Su, Mengdi Huai, Wenjun Jiang, and Jing Gao. 2018. Attack Under Disguise: An Intelligent Data Poisoning Attack Mechanism in Crowdsourcing. In Proc. WWW. 13-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fei Miao, Shuo Han, Shan Lin, John A Stankovic, Desheng Zhang, Sirajum Munir, Hua Huang, Tian He, and George J Pappas. 2016. Taxi Dispatch With Real-Time Sensing Data in Metropolitan Areas: A Receding Horizon Control Approach. IEEE Trans. Automation Science and Engineering 13, 2 (April 2016), 463-478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Takuma Oda and Carlee Joe-Wong. 2018. MOVI: A Model-Free Approach to Dynamic Fleet Management. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM. 2708-2716.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ling Pan, Qingpeng Cai, Zhixuan Fang, Pingzhong Tang, and Longbo Huang. 2018. A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Rebalancing Dockless Bike Sharing Systems. In Proc. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lisa Rayle, Danielle Dai, Nelson Chan, Robert Cervero, and Susan Shaheen. 2016. Just a better Taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy 45(2016), 168-178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sara Sabour, Nicholas Frosst, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2017. Dynamic routing between capsules. In Proc. NIPS. 3856-3866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. 1998. Introduction to Reinforcement Learning. Vol. 135. MIT Press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jian Tang, Meng Qu, Mingzhe Wang, Ming Zhang, Jun Yan, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2015. LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding. In Proc. WWW. 1067-1077. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hado Van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, and David Silver. 2016. Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-Learning.. In Proc. AAAI, Vol. 2. 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Erwin Walraven, Matthijs TJ Spaan, and Bram Bakker. 2016. Traffic flow optimization: A reinforcement learning approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 52 (2016), 203-212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dong Wang, Wei Cao, Jian Li, and Jieping Ye. 2017. DeepSD: Supply-demand prediction for online car-hailing services using deep neural networks. In Proc. IEEE ICDE. 243-254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Zheng Wang, Kun Fu, and Jieping Ye. 2018. Learning to Estimate the Travel Time. In Proc. ACM KDD. 858-866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hua Wei, Guanjie Zheng, Huaxiu Yao, and Zhenhui Li. 2018. Intellilight: A reinforcement learning approach for intelligent traffic light control. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD. 2496-2505. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jian Wen, Jinhua Zhao, and Patrick Jaillet. 2017. Rebalancing shared mobility-on-demand systems: A reinforcement learning approach. In Proc. IEEE ITSC. 220-225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhe Xu, Zhixin Li, Qingwen Guan, Dingshui Zhang, Qiang Li, Junxiao Nan, Chunyang Liu, Wei Bian, and Jieping Ye. 2018. Large-Scale Order Dispatch in On-Demand Ride-Hailing Platforms: A Learning and Planning Approach. In Proc. ACM KDD. 905-913. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Dekang Qi. 2017. Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Prediction.. In Proc. AAAI. 1655-1661. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, Dekang Qi, Ruiyuan Li, Xiuwen Yi, and Tianrui Li. 2018. Predicting citywide crowd flows using deep spatio-temporal residual networks. Artificial Intelligence 259 (2018), 147 - 166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Huanyang Zheng and Jie Wu. 2017. Online to Offline Business: Urban Taxi Dispatching with Passenger-Driver Matching Stability. In Proc. IEEE ICDCS. 816-825.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
    May 2019
    3620 pages
    ISBN:9781450366748
    DOI:10.1145/3308558

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format