skip to main content
10.1145/3304221.3319773acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Action Research to Distill Research-Based Segments of Pedagogical Content Knowledge of K-12 Computer Science Teachers

Published:02 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is an important factor in all that concerns teaching and learning processes. As such, it plays an important role in pre-service teachers' training and in-service teachers' professional development. In line with this, the pedagogical content knowledge of computer science teachers (CS-PCK) receives considerable attention in current computing education research. However, very little is known about effective ways of extracting valid and reliable CS-PCK segments from the practical work of CS in-service teachers, and hence, only a limited reservoir of such segments is available for CS educators. Here we report on research in which we developed and investigated a new strategy for extracting research-based CS-PCK segments from the practical work of experienced high-school teachers. This strategy incorporated action research, conducted by the CS teachers in their classes, as part of a long and extensive workshop for professional development of CS teachers. Our findings show that the use of action research within the unique platform provided by the workshop yielded a rich variety of research-based CS-PCK segments. Furthermore, our findings emphasize the important role of the social context of the workshop in teachers' success in conducting reliable and valid action research. In addition, teachers' attitudes regarding the use of action research as a tool for improving their practice were positive, as well as their tendency to adopt and use this tool in their practice.

References

  1. Michal Armoni. 2011. Looking at secondary teacher preparation through the lens of computer science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11, 4, Article 23, 38 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Miriam Ben-Peretz. 2011. Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1, 3--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Elena Bender, Peter Hubwieser, Niclas Schaper, Melanie Margaritis, Marc Berges, Laura Ohrndorf, Johannes Magenheim, and Sigrid Schubert. 2015. Towards a competency model for teaching computer science, Journal of Education, 90, 4, 519--532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Amanda Berry, and Jan H. Van Driel. 2012. Teaching about teaching science: Aims, strategies and backgrounds of science teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 2, 117--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Malte Buchholz, Mara Saeli, and Carsten Schulte. 2013. PCK and reflection in computer science teacher education. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 8--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David Clarke, and Hilary Hollingsworth. 2002. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947--967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michael F. Connely, Jean D. Cladinin, and Ming Fang He. 1997. Teachers' personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 7, 665--674.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Larry Cuban. 1993. The lure of curricular reform and its pitiful history. Phi Delta Kappan. 75, 2, 182--185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fien Depaepe, Lieven Verschaffel, and Geert Kelchtermans. 2013. Pedagogical content knowledge: a systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Barney G. Glaser, and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ivor Goodson, and Pat Sikes. 2001. Life History Research in Educational Settings: Learning From Lives. Open University Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pamela L. Grossman. 1989. A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 5, 24--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Pamela L. Grossman. 1990. The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA and Teachers College Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Egon G. Guba, and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1981. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series and the Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series, San Francisco, CA, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. John A.C. Hattie. 2003. Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? In Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us, Proceedings of the Australian Council for Educational Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. James Hiebert, Anne Morris, and Brad Glass. 2003. Learning to learn to teach: an experiment model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 3, 201--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Heather C. Hill, Deborah L. Ball, and Stephen G. Schilling. 2008. Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 4, 372--400.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Aleata Hubbard. 2018. Pedagogical content knowledge in computing education: a review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 28, 2, 117--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Peter Hubwieser, Johannes Magenheim, Andreas Mühling, and Alexander Ruf. 2013. Towards a conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge for computer science. In Proceedings of the 9th International Computing Education Research Conference, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Loannis Ioannou, and Charoula Angeli. 2013. Teaching computer science in secondary education: a technological pedagogical content knowledge perspective. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Loannis Ioannou, and Charoula Angeli. 2014. Examining the effect of an instructional intervention on destabilizing learners' misconceptions about the central processing unit. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 93--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dona M. Kagan. 1990. Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 3, 419--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Joseph Keating, Rosario Diaz-Greenberg, Mark Baldwin, and Jacqueline Thousand. 1998. A collaborative action research model for teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Educion, 49, 5, 381--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Herman Koppelman. 2008. Pedagogical content knowledge and educational cases in computer science: an exploration. In Proceedings of the Informing Science & IT Education Conference, 125--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. John Loughran, Amanda Berry, and Pamela Mulhall. 2012. Understanding and Developing Science Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge (2nd Ed.). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. John Loughran, Pamela Mulhall, and Amanda Berry. 2004. In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Sience Teaching, 41, 4, 370--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Shirley Magnusson, Joseph Krajcik, and Hilda Borko. 1999. Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Julie Gess-Newsom, and Norman G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and Science Education. 95--132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Rachel Mamlok-Naaman, Oshrit Navon, Miriam Carmeli, and Avi Hofstein. 2003. Teachers research their students' understanding of electrical conductivity. The Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 62, 13--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Melania Margaritis. 2014. What pedagogical content knowledge competencies do computer science pre-service teachers have? In Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on International computing education research, 161--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Alannah Oleson, Christopher Mendez, Zoe Steine-Hanson, Claudia Hilderbrand, Christopher Perdriau, Margaret Burnett, and Andrew J. Ko. 2018. Pedagogical content knowledge for teaching inclusive design. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 69--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mara Saeli. 2009. How to teach programming in secondary education: First results of a PhD project. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Mara Saeli. 2012. Teaching Programming for Secondary School: a Pedagogical Content Knowledge Based Approach. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mara Saeli, Jacob Perrenet, Wim M. G. Jochem, and Bert Zwaneveld. 2011. Teaching programming in secondary school: a pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Informatics in Education, 10, 1, 73--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Asher Shkedi. 2005. Multiple Case Narrative: A Qualitative Approach to Studying Multiple Populations. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee S. Shulman. 1983. Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In Lee S. Shulman, and Gary Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of Teaching and Policy. Longman, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee S. Shulman. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 2, 4--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Lee S. Shulman. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1, 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Lee S. Shulman. 2002. Truth and consequences? Inquiry and policy in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 3, 248--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Lee S. Shulman. 2007. Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36, 9, 560--563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jan H. van Driel, Douwe Beijaard, and Nico Verloop. 2001. Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 2, 137--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jan H. van Driel, Nico Verloop, and Wobbe de Vos. 1998. Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 6, 673--695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    July 2019
    583 pages
    ISBN:9781450368957
    DOI:10.1145/3304221

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 July 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

    Upcoming Conference

    ITiCSE 2024

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader