skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Student Perspectives on Digital Phenotyping: The Acceptability of Using Smartphone Data to Assess Mental Health

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is a mental health crisis facing universities internationally. A growing body of interdisciplinary research has successfully demonstrated that using sensor and interaction data from students' smartphones can give insight into stress, depression, mood, suicide risk and more. The approach, which is sometimes termed Digital Phenotyping, has potential to transform how mental health and wellbeing can be monitored and understood. The approach could also transform how interventions are designed, delivered and evaluated. To date, little work has addressed the human and ethical side of digital phenotyping, including how students feel about being monitored. In this paper we report findings from in-depth focus groups, prototyping and interviews with students. We find they are positive about mental health technology, but also that there are multi-layered issues to address if digital phenotyping is to become acceptable. Using an acceptability framework, we set out the key design challenges that need to be addressed.

References

  1. Saeed Abdullah, Mark Matthews, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Geri Gay, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2014. Towards Circadian Computing: "Early to Bed and Early to Rise" Makes Some of Us Unhealthy and Sleep Deprived. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 673--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Talayeh Aledavood, Ana Maria Triana Hoyos, Tuomas Alakörkkö, Kimmo Kaski, Jari Saramäki, Erkki Isometsä, and Richard K Darst. 2017. Data collection for mental health studies through digital platforms: requirements and design of a prototype. JMIR research protocols 6, 6 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David Armstrong. 1995. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of health & illness 17, 3 (1995), 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Joost Asselbergs, Jeroen Ruwaard, Michal Ejdys, Niels Schrader, Marit Sijbrandij, and Heleen Riper. 2016. Mobile phone-based unobtrusive ecological momentary assessment of day-to-day mood: an explorative study. Journal of medical Internet research 18, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shrey Bagroy, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. A Social Media Based Index of Mental Well-Being in College Campuses. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1634--1646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lyndsey L. Bakewell, Konstantina Vasileiou, Kiel S. Long, Mark Atkinson, Helen Rice, Manuela Barreto, Julie Barnett, Michael Wilson, Shaun Lawson, and John Vines. 2018. Everything We Do, Everything We Press: Data-Driven Remote Performance Management in a Mobile Workplace. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 371, 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ian Barnett, John Torous, Patrick Staples, Luis Sandoval, Matcheri Keshavan, and Jukka-Pekka Onnela. 2018. Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacology (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dennis Becker, Vincent Bremer, Burkhardt Funk, Joost Asselbergs, Heleen Riper, and Jeroen Ruwaard. 2016. How to Predict Mood? Delving into Features of Smartphone-Based Data. Twenty-second Americas Conference on Information Systems (2016), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dror Ben-Zeev, Emily A Scherer, Rui Wang, Haiyi Xie, and Andrew T Campbell. 2015. Next-generation psychiatric assessment: Using smartphone sensors to monitor behavior and mental health. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal 38, 3 (2015), 218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dror Ben-Zeev, Rui Wang, Saeed Abdullah, Rachel Brian, Emily A Scherer, Lisa A Mistler, Marta Hauser, John M Kane, Andrew Campbell, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. Mobile behavioral sensing for outpatients and inpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatric services 67, 5 (2015), 558--561.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthew Billingsley. 2015. More than 80% of medical students with mental health issues feel under-supported, says Student BMJ survey. Student BMJ 23 (2015), h4521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling Asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: A Large Scale Study on Mobile Application Usage. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mehdi Boukhechba, Yu Huang, Philip Chow, Karl Fua, Bethany A. Teachman, and Laura E. Barnes. 2017. Monitoring Social Anxiety from Mobility and Communication Patterns. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 749--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, and Gareth Terry. 2014. Thematic analysis. Qual Res Clin Health Psychol 24 (2014), 95--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Emma Broglia, Abigail Millings, and Michael Barkham. 2017. Challenges to addressing student mental health in embedded counselling services: a survey of UK higher and further education institutions. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 0, 0 (2017), 1--15. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1370695Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Poppy Brown. 2016. The Invisible Problem?: Improving Students' Mental Health. Higher Education Policy Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Michelle Nicole Burns, Mark Begale, Jennifer Duffecy, Darren Gergle, Chris J Karr, Emily Giangrande, and David C Mohr. 2011. Harnessing context sensing to develop a mobile intervention for depression. Journal of medical Internet research 13, 3 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Luca Canzian and Mirco Musolesi. 2015. Trajectories of depression: unobtrusive monitoring of depressive states by means of smartphone mobility traces analysis. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 1293-- 1304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Laura L Carstensen, Bulent Turan, Susanne Scheibe, Nilam Ram, Hal Ersner-Hershfield, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin, Kathryn P Brooks, and John R Nesselroade. 2011. Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and aging 26, 1 (2011), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Larry Chan, Vedant Das Swain, Christina Kelley, Kaya de Barbaro, Gregory D. Abowd, and Lauren Wilcox. 2018. Students' Experiences with Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Report on Emotional Well-being. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 1 (March 2018), 3:1--3:20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhenyu Chen, Mu Lin, Fanglin Chen, Nicholas D. Lane, Giuseppe Cardone, Rui Wang, Tianxing Li, Yiqiang Chen, Tanzeem Choudhury, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2013. Unobtrusive Sleep Monitoring Using Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth '13). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Chia-Fang Chung, Nanna Gorm, Irina A. Shklovski, and Sean Munson. 2017. Finding the Right Fit: Understanding Health Tracking in Workplace Wellness Programs. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4875--4886. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Karen Church, Denzil Ferreira, Nikola Banovic, and Kent Lyons. 2015. Understanding the Challenges of Mobile Phone Usage Data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 504--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Richard Dawkins. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kevin Eagan, Ellen Bara Stolzenberg, Hilary B Zimmerman, Melissa C Aragon, Hannah Whang Sayson, and Cecilia Rios-Aguilar. 2017. The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2016. Retrieved August 12, 2018 from https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/ files/TheAmericanFreshman2016PREPUB.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nathan Eagle and Alex Pentland. 2006. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and ubiquitous computing 10, 4 (2006), 255--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Paul Eskes, Marco Spruit, Sjaak Brinkkemper, Jacob Vorstman, and Martien J Kas. 2016. The sociability score: App-based social profiling from a healthcare perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 59 (2016), 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Asma Ahmad Farhan, Chaoqun Yue, Reynaldo Morillo, Shweta Ware, Jin Lu, Jinbo Bi, Jayesh Kamath, Alexander Russell, Athanasios Bamis, and Bing Wang. 2016. Behavior vs. introspection: refining prediction of clinical depression via smartphone sensing data. In 2016 IEEE Wireless Health (WH). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Raihana Ferdous, Venet Osmani, and Oscar Mayora. 2018. Smartphone apps usage patterns as a predictor of perceived stress levels at workplace. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03863 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Louise Barkhuus, and Anind K. Dey. 2014. Contextual Experience Sampling of Mobile Application Micro-usage. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Denzil Ferreira, Vassilis Kostakos, and Anind K. Dey. 2015. AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework. Frontiers in ICT 2 (2015), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Office for National Statistics. 2018. Estimating suicide among higher education students, England and Wales: Experimental Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Christopher Frauenberger, Marjo Rauhala, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. In-action ethics. Interacting with Computers 29, 2 (2017), 220--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Robert R German, LM Lee, J Horan, R Milstein, C Pertowski, M Waller, et al. 2001. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. MMWR Recomm Rep 50, 1--35 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Joel M Hektner, Jennifer A Schmidt, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2007. Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu Huang, Haoyi Xiong, Kevin Leach, Yuyan Zhang, Philip Chow, Karl Fua, Bethany A. Teachman, and Laura E. Barnes. 2016. Assessing Social Anxiety Using Gps Trajectories and Point-of-interest Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 898--903. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Galen Chin-Lun Hung, Pei-Ching Yang, Chia-Chi Chang, Jung-Hsien Chiang, and Ying-Yeh Chen. 2016. Predicting negative emotions based on mobile phone usage patterns: an exploratory study. JMIR research protocols 5, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Josiah Gabriel Hunt. 2015. Suicide mortality among students in South Korea: An extended discussion. In International Forum, Vol. 18. 105-- 120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. TR Insel. 2017. Digital phenotyping: Technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA 318, 13 (2017), 1215--1216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Sachin H Jain, Brian W Powers, Jared B Hawkins, and John S Brownstein. 2015. The digital phenotype. Nature Biotechnology 33, 5 (2015), 462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Christina Kelley, Bongshin Lee, and Lauren Wilcox. 2017. Self-tracking for Mental Wellness: Understanding Expert Perspectives and Student Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 629--641. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Helen Kerr. 2013. NUS Mental Distress Survey Overview. Retrieved August 12, 2018 from https://www.nus.org.uk/Global/Campaigns/ 20130517MentalDistressSurveyOverview.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kurt Kroenke and Robert L Spitzer. 2002. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric annals 32, 9 (2002), 509-- 515.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Kwangyoung Lee and Hwajung Hong. 2018. MindNavigator: Exploring the Stress and Self-Interventions for Mental Wellness. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 572, 14 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Uichin Lee, Joonwon Lee, Minsam Ko, Changhun Lee, Yuhwan Kim, Subin Yang, Koji Yatani, Gahgene Gweon, Kyong-Mee Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2014. Hooked on smartphones: an exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2327--2336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Robert LiKamWa, Yunxin Liu, Nicholas D Lane, and Lin Zhong. 2013. Moodscope: Building a mood sensor from smartphone usage patterns. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 389--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Melanie Lovatt and John Holmes. 2017. Digital phenotyping and sociological perspectives in a Brave New World. Addiction 112, 7 (2017), 1286--1289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Ewa Luger and Tom Rodden. 2013. An Informed View on Consent for UbiComp. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 529--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ann Macaskill. 2013. The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 41, 4 (2013), 426--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Anmol Madan, Manuel Cebrian, David Lazer, and Alex Pentland. 2010. Social sensing for epidemiological behavior change. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 291--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, Paul Johns, and Akane Sano. 2016. Neurotics Can'T Focus: An in Situ Study of Online Multitasking in the Workplace. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1739--1744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Gloria Mark, Yiran Wang, and Melissa Niiya. 2014. Stress and Multitasking in Everyday College Life: An Empirical Study of Online Activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Mark Matthews, Elizabeth Murnane, Jaime Snyder, Shion Guha, Pamara Chang, Gavin Doherty, and Geri Gay. 2017. The double-edged sword: A mixed methods study of the interplay between bipolar disorder and technology use. Computers in Human Behavior 75 (2017), 288--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Donald McMillan, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2013. Categorised Ethical Guidelines for Large Scale Mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1853--1862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Abhinav Mehrotra, Fani Tsapeli, Robert Hendley, and Mirco Musolesi. 2017. MyTraces: investigating correlation and causation between users' emotional states and mobile phone interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Graham F Moore, Suzanne Audrey, Mary Barker, Lyndal Bond, Chris Bonell, Wendy Hardeman, Laurence Moore, Alicia O'Cathain, Tannaze Tinati, Daniel Wight, et al. 2015. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. bmj 350 (2015), h1258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Alistair Morrison, Xiaoyu Xiong, Matthew Higgs, Marek Bell, and Matthew Chalmers. 2018. A Large-Scale Study of iPhone App Launch Behaviour. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 344, 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Ian Neale, Laura Piggott, Josephine Hansom, and Sam Fagence. 2016. Student Resilience: Unite Students Insight Report. Retrieved August 12, 2018 from https://www.unitestudents.com/about-us/insightreport/ 2016-full-reportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Alicia L. Nobles, Jeffrey J. Glenn, Kamran Kowsari, Bethany A. Teachman, and Laura E. Barnes. 2018. Identification of Imminent Suicide Risk Among Young Adults Using Text Messages. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 413, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Aisling Ann O'Kane, Yvonne Rogers, and Ann E. Blandford. 2015. Concealing or Revealing Mobile Medical Devices?: Designing for Onstage and Offstage Presentation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1689--1698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Jukka-Pekka Onnela and Scott L Rauch. 2016. Harnessing smartphonebased digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 7 (2016), 1691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Anthony J Onwuegbuzie, Wendy B Dickinson, Nancy L Leech, and Annmarie G Zoran. 2009. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International journal of qualitative methods 8, 3 (2009), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Alex Pentland. 2015. Social Physics: How social networks can make us smarter. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Gary W. Pritchard, Pam Briggs, John Vines, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. How to Drive a London Bus: Measuring Performance in a Mobile and Remote Workplace. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1885--1894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Debra Rickwood, Nic Telford, Shaunagh O'Sullivan, Dimity Crisp, and Robby Magyar. 2016. National Tertiary Student Wellbeing Survey 2016. Retrieved August 12, 2018 from https://www.headspace.org.au/assets/ Uploads/headspace-NUS-Publication-Digital.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Bart Rienties and Bethany Alden Rivers. 2014. Measuring and understanding learner emotions: Evidence and prospects. Learning Analytics Review 1 (2014), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking As Lived Informatics. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Sohrab Saeb, Mi Zhang, Christopher J Karr, Stephen M Schueller, Marya E Corden, Konrad P Kording, and David C Mohr. 2015. Mobile phone sensor correlates of depressive symptom severity in daily-life behavior: an exploratory study. Journal of medical Internet research 17, 7 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Koustuv Saha and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. Modeling Stress with Social Media Around Incidents of Gun Violence on College Campuses. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 92 (Dec. 2017), 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Mandeep Sekhon, Martin Cartwright, and Jill J Francis. 2017. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC health services research 17, 1 (2017), 88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Souraya Sidani, Dana R Epstein, Richard R Bootzin, Patricia Moritz, and Joyal Miranda. 2009. Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure. Research in nursing & health 32, 4 (2009), 419--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Vivek K Singh and Rishav R Agarwal. 2016. Cooperative phoneotypes: exploring phone-based behavioral markers of cooperation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 646--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Vivek K. Singh and Isha Ghosh. 2017. Inferring Individual Social Capital Automatically via Phone Logs. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 95:1--95:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Andrew L Skinner, Angela S Attwood, Roland Baddeley, Karen EvansReeves, Linda Bauld, and Marcus R Munafò. 2017. Digital phenotyping and the development and delivery of health guidelines and behaviour change interventions. Addiction 112, 7 (2017), 1281--1285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Liz Spencer and Jane Ritchie. 2002. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge, 187--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Robert L Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet BW Williams, and Bernd Löwe. 2006. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine 166, 10 (2006), 1092--1097.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Thomas Stütz, Thomas Kowar, Michael Kager, Martin Tiefengrabner, Markus Stuppner, Jens Blechert, Frank H Wilhelm, and Simon Ginzinger. 2015. Smartphone based stress prediction. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 240--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Ruth Tennant, Louise Hiller, Ruth Fishwick, Stephen Platt, Stephen Joseph, Scott Weich, Jane Parkinson, Jenny Secker, and Sarah StewartBrown. 2007. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of life Outcomes 5, 1 (2007), 63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. TR Thorley. 2017. Not By Degrees: Improving Student Mental Health In The UKs Universities. Retrieved August 12, 2018 from https: //www.ippr.org/files/2017-09/1504645674_not-by-degrees170905.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. John Torous, Mathew V Kiang, Jeanette Lorme, and Jukka-Pekka Onnela. 2016. New tools for new research in psychiatry: a scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR mental health 3, 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Jean M Twenge, Brittany Gentile, C Nathan DeWall, Debbie Ma, Katharine Lacefield, and David R Schurtz. 2010. Birth cohort increases in psychopathology among young Americans, 1938--2007: A crosstemporal meta-analysis of the MMPI. Clinical psychology review 30, 2 (2010), 145--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Universities UK. 2018. Minding Our Future: Starting a Conversation About the Support of Student Mental Health. Retrieved August 12, 2018 from https://www. universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2018/ minding-our-future-starting-conversation-student-mental-health. pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Rui Wang, Fanglin Chen, Zhenyu Chen, Tianxing Li, Gabriella Harari, Stefanie Tignor, Xia Zhou, Dror Ben-Zeev, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2014. StudentLife: Assessing Mental Health, Academic Performance and Behavioral Trends of College Students Using Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Rui Wang, Fanglin Chen, Zhenyu Chen, Tianxing Li, Gabriella Harari, Stefanie Tignor, Xia Zhou, Dror Ben-Zeev, and Andrew T Campbell. 2014. StudentLife: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Rui Wang, Weichen Wang, Min SH Aung, Dror Ben-Zeev, Rachel Brian, Andrew T Campbell, Tanzeem Choudhury, Marta Hauser, John Kane, Emily A Scherer, et al. 2017. Predicting Symptom Trajectories of Schizophrenia using Mobile Sensing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Rui Wang, Weichen Wang, Min S. H. Aung, Dror Ben-Zeev, Rachel Brian, Andrew T. Campbell, Tanzeem Choudhury, Marta Hauser, John Kane, Emily A. Scherer, and Megan Walsh. 2017. Predicting Symptom Trajectories of Schizophrenia Using Mobile Sensing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 110 (Sept. 2017), 24 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Pascal Welke, Ionut Andone, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, and Alexander Markowetz. 2016. Differentiating Smartphone Users by App Usage. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 519--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Julie Rico Williamson. 2011. Send Me Bubbles: Multimodal Performance and Social Acceptability. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 899--904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Martina Ziefle and Carsten Röcker. 2010. Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2010 4th International Conference. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Student Perspectives on Digital Phenotyping: The Acceptability of Using Smartphone Data to Assess Mental Health

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format