skip to main content
10.1145/3284389.3284395acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mediated Spatial Narratives: Experiencing Archival Material and Shared Memories in Urban Space

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we report on studies we conducted focusing on the use of Augmented Reality to annotate real sites with relevant archival content. This is an interdisciplinary study of novel interactive technologies and supportive platforms such as geolocation-navigation and contextual digital augmentation of archival material in public spaces. We involved community volunteers, experts and public in a participatory heritage initiative. We designed an experience that supported a multi-platform participation, via an online geo-tagging portal and a mixed reality navigational experience. In an iterative design process we explored the use and preference of mobile devices, the controlled design of digital content anchored to real sites and the use of AR to support urban narratives. This was achieved by conducting a series of user walkthroughs with recruited participants and workshops with local experts related to the case studies. In this paper we stress the importance of situating urban experience of digital archives and stories in the actual locations of the events they represent as to better support immersion, enhance place experience and reinforce situated learning. Our work contributes to the design of hybrid spatial experiences in the city context that relate to local memory and culture.

References

  1. A Heritage trail app for London's iconic Battersea Power Station (2018): https://calvium.com/projects/battersea-power-station-redevelopment, last accessed 13 September 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Bedwell and T. Caruana 2012. Encouraging spectacle to create self-sustaining interactions at public displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Colley, J. Thebault-Spieker, A.Y. Lin, D. Degraen, B. Fischman, J. Häkkilä, K. Kuehl, V. Nisi, N.J. Nunes, N. Wenig, and D. Wenig, 2017. The geography of Pokémon GO: beneficial and problematic effects on places and movement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1179--1192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J.B. Cranshaw, K. Luther, P.G. Kelley and N. Sadeh 2014. Curated city: capturing individual city guides through social curation, 3249--3258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Fatah gen. Schieck, A. Moutinho, E. Kostopoulou, R. Freeman, S. Senevirathne and C. Grover 2014. Augmented Urban Experience through Mediated Spatial Narratives. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 275--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Feiner, B. MacIntyre, T. Höllerer and A. Webster 1997. A touring machine: Prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment. Personal Technologies. 1, 4, 208--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. L. Hespanhol and M. Tomitsch 2012. Designing for collective participation with media installations in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference: Participation (MAB '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. Hillier 1996. Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture, Space Syntax, Electronic Edition, London, Chapter 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Javornik, E. Kostopoulou, Y. Rogers, A. Fatah gen Schieck, P. Koutsolampros, A. M. Moutinho & S. Julier 2018. An experimental study on the role of augmented reality content type in an outdoor site exploration, Behaviour & Information Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Julier, A. Fatah gen. Schieck, P. Blume, A. Moutinho, P. Koutsolampros, A. Javornik, A. Rovira, and E. Kostopoulou 2016. VisAge: Augmented reality for heritage. Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, 257--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Lane 2003. Urban Tapestries: Wireless networking, public authoring and social knowledge. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 7, 3--4, 169--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Lochrie, K. Čopinc Pucihar, A. Gradinar and P. Coulton 2013. Time-wARpXplorer: creating a playful experience in an urban time warp. Physical and Digital in Games and Play.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Martin and G. Lane 2007. Making Glue: Public Authoring in Urban Tapestries. (2007). Position paper for workshop 'Shared Encounters', ACM Conf Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. McQuire 2008. Theory, Culture & Society: The media city: Media, architecture and Urban space, SAGE Publications, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Memarovic, A. Fatah gen Schieck, H. Schnädelbach, E. Kostopoulou, S. North and L. Ye 2016. Longitudinal, cross-site and in the Wild: a study of public displays user communities' situated snapshots.In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Media Architecture Biennale (MAB). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Moutinho, A. Javornik, P. Koutsolampros, A. Rovira, P. Blume, S. Julier 2015. A collaborative process of creating local memory though augmented reality. MEDIACITY 5 International Conference: reflecting on social smart city.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Müller, R. Walter, G. Bailly, M. Nischt and F. Alt 2012. Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of a shop window. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 297--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Z. Noh, M.S. Sunar and Z. Pan 2009. A review on augmented reality for virtual heritage system. International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment, 50--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. N.L.M. Noor, S. Razali and W.A.W. Adnan 2010. Digital cultural heritage: Community empowerment via community-based e-museum. Information Society (i-Society), 2010 International Conference on, 542--547.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Riley, D.C. Harvey, T. Brown and S. Mills 2005. Narrating landscape: The potential of oral history for landscape archaeology. Public Archaeology. 4, 1, 15--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. L. Smith 2006. Uses of heritage. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. Srinivasan 2006. Indigenous, ethnic and cultural articulations of new media. International journal of cultural studies. 9, 4, 497--518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Urban Augmented Reality UAR, NAI augmented reality application (1993-2013): https://nai.hetnieuweinstituut.nl/en/uar, last accessed 13 September 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V. Vlahakis, M. Ioannidis, J. Karigiannis, M. Tsotros, M. Gounaris, D. Stricker, T. Gleue, P. Daehne and L. Almeida 2002. Archeoguide: an augmented reality guide for archaeological sites. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 22, 5, 52--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mediated Spatial Narratives: Experiencing Archival Material and Shared Memories in Urban Space
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MAB '18: Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference
            November 2018
            192 pages
            ISBN:9781450364782
            DOI:10.1145/3284389

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 November 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            MAB '18 Paper Acceptance Rate15of31submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate27of68submissions,40%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader