ABSTRACT
When social media platforms do not offer adequate privacy and safety features, users construct their own strategies for protecting private information and avoiding harassment. Women and LGBTQIA people are vulnerable targets if their privacy is violated, leading to situations that can compromise their safety both online and off. In an initial exploration of privacy and safety concerns of participants in online fan communities, we find that they avoid engaging online to preserve their privacy and safety, thus limiting the involvement of already marginalized voices in public discourse. LGBTQIA people in particular practice non-use for fear of being outed in personal spaces if recognized. In response to challenges users face, we recommend that developers consider finer controls over user content in addition to thoughtful practices among researchers and journalists when it comes to sharing "public" data.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Display Poster
- Mary Elizabeth Ballard and Kelly Marie Welch. 2017. Virtual Warfare?: Cyberbullying and Cyber-Victimization in MMOG Play. 12, 5: 466--491.Google Scholar
- Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Pyschology 3: 77--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristina Busse. 2018. The Ethics of Studying Online Fandom. In The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom, Melissa A. Click and Suzanne Scott (eds.). Routledge, New York, 9--17.Google Scholar
- Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. Proc. CHI 2016: 2574--2585. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. "Participant" Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society.Google Scholar
- Samantha Jaroszewski, Danielle Lottridge, Oliver L. Haimson, and Katie Quehl. 2018. "Genderfluid " or " Attack Helicopter ": Responsible HCI Practice with Non- Binary Gender Variation in Online Communities. Proc. CHI 2018: 307--321. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abigail De Kosnik. 2016. Rogue Archives: Digital Cultural Memory and Media Fandom. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56, 3: 330--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeanine Warisse Turner, Jean A. Grube, and Jennifer Meyers. 2001. Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication 51, 2: 231--251.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Vulnerable and Online: Fandom's Case for Stronger Privacy Norms and Tools
Recommendations
Online Fandom: Boldly Going Where Few CSCW Researchers Have Gone Before
CSCW '18 Companion: Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingCommunities focused on creating and sharing fanworks have existed since before the internet, but have thrived in the presence of online platforms. From young people learning literacy skills through writing fanfiction about their favorite media to ...
Moving Across Lands: Online Platform Migration in Fandom Communities
CSCWWhen online platforms rise and fall, sometimes communities fade away, and sometimes they pack their bags and relocate to a new home. To explore the causes and effects of online community migration, we examine transformative fandom, a longstanding, ...
Social Norm Vulnerability and its Consequences for Privacy and Safety in an Online Community
CSCWWithin online communities, social norms that both set expectations for and regulate behavior can be vital to the overall welfare of the community--particularly in the context of the privacy and safety of its members. For communities where the cost of ...
Comments