skip to main content
10.1145/3240117.3240119acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdtucConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Together We Buy, Alone I Quit: Some Experimental Studies of Online Persuaders

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a simple web experiment in which participants are asked to listen to a small number of songs and download the two they liked the most. In the experiment, participants were subject to common types of online feedbacks such as star ratings, recommendations and expert advice. Somewhat surprisingly, such online cues had no impact on market shares, but a significant difference emerged as far as market volume was concerned. When operating under the influence of online cues conjuring the presence of others activities soared: participants downloaded, listened to and rated songs much more than in the other scenarios.

References

  1. Andrés Abeliuk, Gerardo Berbeglia, Pascal Van Hentenryck, Tad Hogg, and Kristina Lerman. 2017. Taming the Unpredictability of Cultural Markets with Social Influence. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gediminas Adomavicius and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2005. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 17, 6 (2005), 734--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marzia Antenore, Alessandro Panconesi, and Erisa Terolli. 2018. Songs of a Future Past-An Experimental Study of Online Persuaders.. In ICWSM. 12--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Solomon E Asch. 1956. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological monographs: General and applied 70, 9 (1956), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yi-Fen Chen. 2008. Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5 (2008), 1977--1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard S Crutchfield. 1955. Conformity and character. American Psychologist 10, 5 (1955), 191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Leon Festinger and James M Carlsmith. 1959. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58, 2 (1959), 203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gerd Gigerenzer and Wolfgang Gaissmaier. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual review of psychology 62 (2011), 451--482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eun Go, Eun Hwa Jung, and Mu Wu. 2014. The effects of source cues on online news perception. Computers in Human Behavior 38 (2014), 358--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Reid Hastie and Robyn M Dawes. 2010. Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alan Lewis. 2012. The Cambridge handbook of psychology and economic behaviour. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Greg Linden, Brent Smith, and Jeremy York. 2003. Amazon. com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet computing 7, 1 (2003), 76--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lev Muchnik, Sinan Aral, and Sean J Taylor. 2013. Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341, 6146 (2013), 647--651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Paul Resnick, Neophytos Iacovou, Mitesh Suchak, Peter Bergstrom, and John Riedl. 1994. GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 175--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Matthew J Salganik, Peter Sheridan Dodds, and Duncan J Watts. {n. d.}. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. science 311, 5762 ({n. d.}), 854--856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Matthew J Salganik and Duncan J Watts. 2008. Leading the herd astray: An experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies in an artificial cultural market. Social psychology quarterly 71, 4 (2008), 338--355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sylvain Senecal and Jacques Nantel. 2004. The influence of online product recommendations on consumersâĂrŹ online choices. Journal of retailing 80, 2 (2004), 159--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S Shyam Sundar, Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, and Matthias R Hastall. 2007. News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 58, 3 (2007), 366--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Norman Triplett. 1898. The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American journal of psychology 9, 4 (1898), 507--533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Arnout Van de Rijt, Soong Moon Kang, Michael Restivo, and Akshay Patil. 2014. Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 19 (2014), 6934--6939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Robert B Zajonc. 1965. Social facilitation. Science 149, 3681 (1965), 269--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Haiyi Zhu and Bernardo A Huberman. 2014. To switch or not to switch: understanding social influence in online choices. American Behavioral Scientist 58, 10 (2014), 1329--1344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Together We Buy, Alone I Quit: Some Experimental Studies of Online Persuaders

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            DTUC '18: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress
            October 2018
            148 pages

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            DTUC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate26of46submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate48of88submissions,55%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader