skip to main content
10.1145/3205651.3208242acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Framework for planning the training sessions in triathlon

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, planning sport training sessions with computational intelligence have been studied by many authors. Most of the algorithms were used for proposing basic and advanced training plans for athletes. In a nutshell, most of the solutions focused on the individual sports disciplines, such as, for example, cycling and running. To the knowledge of the authors, few efforts were invested into planning sports training sessions in triathlon. Triathlon is considered as a popular multi-disciplinary sport consisting of three different sport disciplines. Therefore, planning the triathlon training sessions is much harder than the planning in individual sport disciplines. In this paper, we propose an initial framework for planning triathlon training sessions using Particle Swarm Optimization. Preliminary results are also shown.

References

  1. David L Carey, Justin Crow, Kok-Leong Ong, Peter Blanch, Meg E Morris, Ben J Dascombe, and Kay M Crossley. 2017. Optimising pre-season training loads in Australian football. International journal of sports physiology and performance (2017), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Elnaz Davoodi and Ali Reza Khanteymoori. 2010. Horse racing prediction using artificial neural networks. Recent Advances in Neural Networks, Fuzzy Systems & Evolutionary Computing 2010 (2010), 155--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy. 1995. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995. MHS '95., Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on. 39--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Iztok Fister, Samo Rauter, Xin-She Yang, Karin Ljubič, and Iztok Fister Jr. 2015. Planning the sports training sessions with the bat algorithm. Neurocomputing 149 (2015), 993--1002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nattapon Kumyaito, Preecha Yupapin, and Kreangsak Tamee. 2018. Planning a sports training program using Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with emphasis on physiological constraints. BMC research notes 11, 1 (2018), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hristo Novatchkov and Arnold Baca. 2012. Machine learning methods for the automatic evaluation of exercises on sensor-equipped weight training machines. Procedia Engineering 34 (2012), 562--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hristo Novatchkov and Arnold Baca. 2013. Fuzzy logic in sports: a review and an illustrative case study in the field of strength training. International Journal of Computer Applications 71, 6 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. David Schaefer, Alexander Asteroth, and Melanie Ludwig. 2015. Training plan evolution based on training models. In Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), 2015 International Symposium on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. António José Silva, Aldo Manuel Costa, Paulo Moura Oliveira, Victor Machado Reis, José Saavedra, Jürgen Perl, Abel Rouboa, and Daniel Almeida Marinho. 2007. The use of neural network technology to model swimming performance. Journal of sports science & medicine 6, 1 (2007), 117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Framework for planning the training sessions in triathlon

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '18: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
      July 2018
      1968 pages
      ISBN:9781450357647
      DOI:10.1145/3205651

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 July 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader