skip to main content
10.1145/320297.320312acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Reducing the problems of group undo

Published:01 November 1999Publication History

ABSTRACT

Providing undo functionality in groupware has been identified as an important, but difficult problem. Existing solutions show deficiencies like lacking generality, being too complex, being inefficient, or failing to yield acceptable results in common situations. In this paper we describe a new approach which reduces local group undo to a transformation-based method for combining the effects of concurrently issued user commands. Besides transformations we introduce mirror and folding operators in order to build a unique and consistent multidimensional model of the user interaction. In this way the problems of group undo mentioned above can be either overcome or at least reduced.

References

  1. 1.Abowd, Gregory D., and Dix, Alan J. Giving Undo Attention. Interacting with Computers, 4(3), 317-342, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Berlage, Thomas. A selective Undo Mechanism for Graphical User Interfaces Based on Command Objects. A CM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1 (3), 269-294, September 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J. Concurrency control in groupware systems. Proceedings of A CM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, pp.399-407. 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein G.L. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. CA CM 34(1), pp. 39-58, January 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Norman, Donald A., Draper, Stephen W. (eds.). User Centered Systems Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, I-Iillsdale, NJ, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Palmer, Christopher R., Cormack, Gordon V. Operation Transforms for a Distributed Shared Spreadsheet. Proceedings of the CSCW 98, Seattle, WA, November 14-18, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Prakash, Atul, and Knister, Michael J. A Framework for Undoing Actions in Collaborative Systems. A CM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(4), 295-330, December 1994 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Ressel, Matthias, Nitsche-Ruhland, Doris, and Gunzenhiiuser, Rul. An Integrating Transformation- Oriented Approach to Concurrency Control and Undo in Group Editors. Proceedings of CSCW'96, Boston, Mass., November 16-20, 1996, 288-297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Sun, Chengzheng, Ellis, Clarence (Skip): Operational Transformation in Real-Time Group Editors: Issues, Algorithms, and Achievements. Proceedings of the CSCW "98, Seattle, WA, November 14-18, pp. 59-68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reducing the problems of group undo

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '99: Proceedings of the 1999 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        November 1999
        400 pages
        ISBN:1581130651
        DOI:10.1145/320297

        Copyright © 1999 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 November 1999

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader