skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174116acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PokeRing: Notifications by Poking Around the Finger

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart-rings are ideal for subtle and always-available haptic notifications due to their direct contact with the skin. Previous researchers have highlighted the feasibility of haptic technology in smart-rings and their promise in delivering noticeable stimulations by poking a limited set of planar locations on the finger. However, the full potential of poking as a mechanism to deliver richer and more expressive information on the finger is overlooked. With three studies and a total of 76 participants, we informed the design of PokeRing, a smart-ring capable of delivering information via stimulating eight different locations around the index finger's proximal phalanx. We report our evaluation of the performance of PokeRing in semi-realistic wearable conditions, (standing and walking), and its effective usage for information transfer with twenty-one spatio-temporal patterns designed by six interaction designers in a workshop. Finally, we present three applications that exploit PokeRing's notification usages.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4335-file5.mp4

mp4

11.5 MB

pn4335.mp4

mp4

229.2 MB

pn4335.mp4

mp4

229.2 MB

References

  1. Apple Inc. 2015. Devices and Methods for a Ring Computing Device USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blue Nile website: https://www.bluenile.com/at/education/rings/find-your-ring-size {last access on September 2017}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephen Brewster and Lorna M. Brown. 2004. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proceedings of the fifth conference on Australasian user interface - Volume 28 (AUIC '04), A. Cockburn (Ed.), Vol. 28. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 15--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. David S. Burch and Dianne T.V. Pawluk. 2009. A cheap, portable haptic device for a method to relay 2-D texture-enriched graphical information to individuals who are visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SI GACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 215--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Francesco Chinello, Monica Malvezzi, Claudio Pacchierotti and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2012. A three DoFs wearable tactile display for exploration and manipulation of virtual objects. in Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS), 2012 IEEE, IEEE, 71--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yongsoon Choi, Jordan Tewell, Yukihiro Morisawa, Gilang A. Pradana, and Adrian David Cheok. 2014. Ring*U: a wearable system for intimate communication using tactile lighting expressions. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 63, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Artem Dementyev, Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao, Inrak Choi, Deborah Ajilo, Maggie Xu, Joseph A. Paradiso, Chris Schmandt, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Rovables: Figure 10. Three demo notification applications. Eyes-free notification of phone calls (a); affective communication with emoji and poking (b); spatial cues for car navigation (c). Miniature On-Body Robots as Mobile Wearables. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mohamad Eid, Jongeun Cha, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2008. HugMe: A Haptic Videoconferencing System for Interpersonal Communication. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces, and Measurement Systems (VECIMS 2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Euan Freeman, Stephen Brewster, and Vuokko Lantz. 2014. Tactile Feedback for Above-Device Gesture Interfaces: Adding Touch to Touchless Interactions. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 419--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Brian T Gleeson, Scott K Horschel, and William R Provancher. 2010. Design of a fingertip-mounted tactile display with tangential skin displacement feedback. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 3 (4). 297--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Teng Han, Qian Han, Michelle Annett, Fraser Anderson, Da-Yuan Huang, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2017. Frictio: Passive Kines thetic Force Feedback for Smart Ring Output. in ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology 52: 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng-Ju Hsieh, Rong-Hao Liang, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2016. NailTactors: eyes-free spatial output using a nail-mounted tactor array. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 29--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ali Israr, and Ivan Poupyrev. 2011. Control space of apparent haptic motion. In Proceedings of the 2011 World Haptics Conference (WHC), IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Seungwoo Je, Brendan Rooney, Liwei Chan, and Andrea Bianchi. 2017. tactoRing: A Skin-Drag Discrete Display. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3106--3114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Seungwoo Je, Okyu Choi, Kyungah Choi, Minkyeong Lee, Hyeon-Jeong Suk, Liwei Chan, and Andrea Bianchi. 2017. Designing skin-dragging haptic motions for wearables. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 98--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lynette A. Jones and Susan J. Lederman. 2006. Human Hand Function.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenneth O. Johnson and John R. Philips. 1981. Tactile Spatial Resolution. I. Two-point Discrimination, Gap Detection, Grating Resolution, and Letter Recognition. Journal of neurophysiology Vol. 46: 1177--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hwan Kim, Minhwan Kim, and Woohun Lee. 2016. HapThimble: A Wearable Haptic Device towards Usable Virtual Touch Screen. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3694--3705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jacob H. Kirman. 1974. Tactile apparent movement: The effects of interstimulus onset interval and stimulus duration. Perception&Psychophysics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hamed Ketabdar, Peyman Moghadam, and Mehran Roshandel. 2012. Pingu: A new miniature wearable device for ubiquitous computing environments. in Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), 2012 Sixth International Conference on, IEEE, 502--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jaeyeon Lee and Geehyuk Lee. 2016. Designing a Non-contact Wearable Tactile Display Using Airflows. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tomosuke Maeda, Roshan Peiris, Nakatani Masashi, Yoshihiro Tanaka, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2016. HapticAid: wearable haptic augmentation system for enhanced, enchanted and empathised haptic experiences. In SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Emerging Technologies (SA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stefan Marti and Chris Schmandt. 2005. Giving the caller the finger: collaborative responsibility for cellphone interruptions. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1633--1636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Cameron S. Miner, Denise M. Chan, and Christopher Campbell. 2001. Digital jewelry: wearable technology for everyday life. In CHI'01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. George A Miller. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. In Proceedings of Psychological review, 63.2: 81Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Takaki Murakami, Tanner Person, Charith Lasantha xFernando, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2017. Altered touch: miniature haptic display with force, thermal and tactile feedback for augmented haptics. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Posters (SIGGRAPH '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Masataka Niwa, Yasuyuki Yanagida, Haruo Noma, Kenichi Hosaka, Yuichiro Kume. 2004. Vibrotactile apparent movement by DC motors and voice-coil tactors. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Young-Woo Park, Sungjae Hwang, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2011. Poke: emotional touch delivery through an inflatable surface over interpersonal mobile communications. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium adjunct on User interface software and technology (UIST '11 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Fabrizio Pece, Juan Jose Zarate, Velko Vechev, Nadine Besse, Olexandr Gudozhnik, Herbert Shea, and Otmar Hilliges. MagTics: Flexible and Thin Form Factor Magnetic Actuators for Dynamic and Wearable Haptic Feedback. 2017. In Proceedings of the 30th AnnualSymposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '17). ACM, Quebec City, QC, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Gilang Andi Pradana, Adrian David Cheok, Masahiko Inami, Jordan Tewell, and Yongsoon Choi. 2014. Emotional priming of mobile text messages with ring-shaped wearable device using color lighting and tactile expressions. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA,, Article 14, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Thijs Roumen, Simon T. Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2015. NotiRing: A Comparative Study of Notification Channels for Wearable Interactive Rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2497--2500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Roy Shilkrot, Jochen Huber, Jürgen Steimle, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Pattie Maes. 2015. Digital Digits: A Comprehensive Survey of Finger Augmentation Devices. ACM Comput. Surv. 48, 2, Article 30 (November 2015), 29 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3055--3064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Evan Strasnick, Jackie Yang, Kesler Tanner, Alex Olwal, and Sean Follmer. 2017. shiftIO: Reconfigurable Tactile Elements for Dynamic Affordances and Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5075--5086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hong Z. Tan, Charlotte M. Reed, Nathaniel I. Durlach. Optimum Information Transfer Rates for Communication through Haptic and Other Sensory Modalities. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 2 (Apr. 2010), 98--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jonathan Tong, Oliver Mao, and Daniel Goldreich. fjd 2013. Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessement. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Vol.7: 1--11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Julia Werner, Reto Wettach, and Eva Hornecker. 2008. United-pulse: feeling your partner's pulse. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 535--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Vibol Yem, Ryuta Okazaki, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2016. FinGAR: combination of electrical and mechanical stimulation for high-fidelity tactile presentation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kiwon Yeom, Jounghuem Kwon, JooHyun Maeng, and Bum-Jae You. 2015. {POSTER} Haptic Ring Interface Enabling Air-Writing in Virtual Reality Environment. in Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2015 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, 124--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. PokeRing: Notifications by Poking Around the Finger

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader