Garrett C. Millar
Payam Tabrizian
Brendan Harmon
ABSTRACT
This paper presents novel and effective methods for teaching about topography--or shape of terrain--and assessing 3-dimensional spatial learning using tangibles. We used Tangible Landscape--a tangible interface for geospatial modeling--to teach multiple hands-on tangible lessons on the concepts of grading (i.e., earthwork), geomorphology, and hydrology. We examined students' ratings of the system's usability and user experience and tested students' acquisition and transfer of knowledge. Our results suggest the physicality of the objects enabled the participants to effectively interact with the system and each other, positively impacting ratings of usability and task-specific knowledge building. These findings can potentially advance the design and implementation of tangible teaching methods for the topics of geography, design, architecture, and engineering.
Supplemental Material
- Bettina Berendo and Petra Jansen-Osmann. 1997. Feature accumulation and route structuring in distance estimations--an interdisciplinary approach. Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS (1997), 279--296. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Nigel Bevan. 2009. Usability. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, 3247--3251.Google Scholar
- Thomas P Carpenter, Elizabeth Fennema, Megan Loef Franke, Linda Levi, and Susan B Empson. 1999. Children's mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. ERIC.Google Scholar
- Andy Clark. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. OUP USA.Google Scholar
- Alan Dix. 2009. Human-computer interaction. In Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, 1327--1331.Google Scholar
- Brendan Harmon, Anna Petrasova, Vaclav Petras, Helena Mitasova, and Ross K Meentemeyer. 2016. Tangible Landscape: Cognitively grasping the flow of water. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences 41 (2016).Google Scholar
- Mary Hegarty, Madeleine Keehner, Peter Khooshabeh, and Daniel R Montello. 2009. How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learning and Individual Differences 19, 1 (2009), 61--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, xv--xxv. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hiroshi Ishii, Dávid Lakatos, Leonardo Bonanni, and Jean-Baptiste Labrune. 2012. Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials. interactions 19, 1 (2012), 38--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarosław Jasiewicz and Tomasz F Stepinski. 2013. Geomorphons-a pattern recognition approach to classification and mapping of landforms. Geomorphology 182 (2013), 147--156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patrick Jermann, Guillaume Zufferey, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2008. Tinkering or sketching: Apprentices' use of tangibles and drawings to solve design problems. Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts (2008), 167--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Kirsh. 2013. Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1 (2013), 3:1--3:30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliver Kreylos. 2017. Augmented Reality Sandbox. (2017). Retrieved 01--20--2017 from https://arsandbox.ucdavis.edu/Google Scholar
- Daniel Leithinger and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. Relief: a scalable actuated shape display. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. ACM, 221--222. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lynn S Liben and Sarah J Titus. 2012. The importance of spatial thinking for geoscience education: Insights from the crossroads of geoscience and cognitive science. Geological Society of America Special Papers 486 (2012), 51--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helena Mitasova, Chris Thaxton, Jaroslav Hofierka, Richard McLaughlin, Amber Moore, and Lubos Mitas. 2004. Path sampling method for modeling overland water flow, sediment transport, and short term terrain evolution in Open Source GIS. In Computational Methods in Water Resources: Volume 2, Cass T. Miller and George F. Pinder (Eds.). Developments in Water Science, Vol. 55. Elsevier, 1479 -- 1490.Google Scholar
- Markus Neteler, M Hamish Bowman, Martin Landa, and Markus Metz. 2012. GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS. Environmental Modelling & Software 31 (2012), 124--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nora S Newcombe and Thomas F Shipley. 2015. Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer, 179--192.Google Scholar
- Nora S Newcombe, Steven M Weisberg, Kinnari Atit, Matthew E Jacovina, Carol J Ormand, and Thomas F Shipley. 2015. The lay of the land: Sensing and representing topography. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 10, 1 (2015), 6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Petrasova, Brendan Harmon, Vaclav Petras, and Helena Mitasova. 2015. Tangible modeling with open source GIS. Springer. Google Scholar
- Peter Petschek. 2008. Grading for Landscape Architects and Architects. Birkhäuser, Boston.Google Scholar
- Ivan Poupyrev, Tatsushi Nashida, and Makoto Okabe. 2007. Actuation and tangible user interfaces: the Vaucanson duck, robots, and shape displays. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, 205--212. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David N Rapp, Steven A Culpepper, Kent Kirkby, and Paul Morin. 2007. Fostering students' comprehension of topographic maps. Journal of Geoscience Education 55, 1 (2007), 5--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Ras, Valérie Maquil, Muriel Foulonneau, and Thibaud Latour. 2012. Empirical studies on a tangible user interface for technology-based assessment: Insights and emerging challenges. International Journal of e-Assessment (IJEA), CAA (2012), 201--241.Google Scholar
- Majken K Rasmussen, Esben W Pedersen, Marianne G Petersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 735--744. Google ScholarDigital Library
- SE Reed, O Kreylos, S Hsi, LH Kellogg, G Schladow, MB Yikilmaz, H Segale, J Silverman, S Yalowitz, and E Sato. 2014. Shaping watersheds exhibit: An interactive, augmented reality sandbox for advancing earth science education. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.Google Scholar
- Stephen J Reynolds, Michael D Piburn, Debra E Leedy, Carla M McAuliffe, James P Birk, and Julia K Johnson. 2006. The Hidden Earth-Interactive, computer-based modules for geoscience learning. Geological Society of America Special Papers 413 (2006), 157--170.Google Scholar
- Eric M Riggs. 2009. A role for mental rotations in field-based problem solving. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program. Paper 68--2 (2009).Google Scholar
- Roger C Schank, Tamara R Berman, and Kimberli A Macpherson. 1999. Learning by doing. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory 2 (1999), 161--181.Google Scholar
- Bertrand Schneider and Paulo Blikstein. 2015. Unraveling Students' Interaction Around a Tangible Interface using Multimodal Learning Analytics. JEDM Journal of Educational Data Mining 7, 3 (2015), 89--116. http://www.educationaldatamining.org/JEDM/index.php/ JEDM/article/view/JEDM102/pdfGoogle Scholar
- Tia Shelley, Leilah Lyons, Moira Zellner, and Emily Minor. 2011. Evaluating the Embodiment Benefits of a Paper-Based TUI for Educational Simulations. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI EA '11 (2011), 1375--1380. Google ScholarDigital Library
- RJW Sluis, Ivo Weevers, CHGJ Van Schijndel, Lyuba Kolos-Mazuryk, Siska Fitrianie, and JBOS Martens. 2004. Read-It: five-to-seven-year-old children learn to read in a tabletop environment. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community. ACM, 73--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sheryl A Sorby. 2009. Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education 31, 3 (2009), 459--480.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steven Strom, Kurt Nathan, and Jake Woland. 2013. Site Engineering for Landscape Architects. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Payam Tabrizian, Brendan Harmon, Anna Petrasova, Vaclav Petras, Helena Mitasova, and Ross Meentemeyer. 2017. Tangible Immersion for Ecological Design. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), Cambridge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Payam Tabrizian, Anna Petrasova, Brendan Harmon, Vaclav Petras, Helena Mitasova, and Ross Meentemeyer. 2016. Immersive Tangible Geospatial Modeling. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, San Fransisco. ACM, 88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- GRASS Development Team. 2017. Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) software, version 7.2. grass.osgeo.org. (2017).Google Scholar
- Lucia Terrenghi, Matthias Kranz, Paul Holleis, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2006. A cube to learn: a tangible user interface for the design of a learning appliance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2--3 (2006), 153--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Titus and Eric Horsman. 2009. Characterizing and improving spatial visualization skills. Journal of Geoscience Education 57, 4 (2009), 242--254.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard K Untermann. 1973. Grade Easy: An Introductory Course in the Principles and Practices of Grading and Drainage. Technical Report. American Society of Landscape Architects.Google Scholar
- David H Uttal, Nathaniel G Meadow, Elizabeth Tipton, Linda L Hand, Alison R Alden, Christopher Warren, and Nora S Newcombe. 2013. The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. (2013).Google Scholar
- Terri L Woods, Sarah Reed, Sherry Hsi, John A Woods, and Michael R Woods. 2016. Pilot Study Using the Augmented Reality Sandbox to Teach Topographic Maps and Surficial Processes in Introductory Geology Labs. Journal of Geoscience Education 64, 3 (2016), 199--214.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 859--868. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Tangible Landscape: A Hands-on Method for Teaching Terrain Analysis
Recommendations
Immersive tangible geospatial modeling
SIGSPACIAL '16: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information SystemsTangible Landscape is a tangible interface for geographic information systems (GIS). It interactively couples physical and digital models of a landscape so that users can intuitively explore, model, and analyze geospatial data in a collaborative ...
Embodied Spatial Thinking in Tangible Computing
TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionTangible user interfaces are based on the premise that embodied cognition in computing can enhance cognitive processes. However, the ways in which embodied cognition in computing transform spatial thinking have not yet been rigorously studied. I have co-...
Tangible bots: interaction with active tangibles in tabletop interfaces
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present interaction techniques for tangible tabletop interfaces that use active, motorized tangibles, what we call Tangible Bots. Tangible Bots can reflect changes in the digital model and assist users by haptic feedback, by correcting errors, by ...
Comments