skip to main content
10.1145/3172944.3173007acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Coupling Story to Visualization: Using Textual Analysis as a Bridge Between Data and Interpretation

Published:05 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online writers and journalism media are increasingly combining visualization (and other multimedia content) with narrative text to create narrative visualizations. Often, however, the two elements are presented independently of one another. We propose an approach to automatically integrate text and visualization elements. We begin with a writer»s narrative that presumably can be supported with visual data evidence. We leverage natural language processing, quantitative narrative analysis, and information visualization to (1) automatically extract narrative components (who, what, when, where) from data-rich stories, and (2) integrate the supporting data evidence with the text to develop a narrative visualization. We also employ bidirectional interaction from text to visualization and visualization to text to support reader exploration in both directions. We demonstrate the approach with a case study in the data-rich field of sports journalism.

References

  1. Ruben Arcos and Randolph Pherson. 2015. Intelligence Communication in the Digital Era: Transforming Security, Defence and Business. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chris Bryan, Kwan-Liu Ma, and Jonathan Woodring. 2017. Temporal summary images: An approach to narrative visualization via interactive annotation generation and placement. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1 (2017), 511--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Wenwen Dou, Xiaoyu Wang, Drew Skau, William Ribarsky, and Michelle X Zhou. 2012. Leadline: Interactive visual analysis of text data through event identification and exploration. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2012 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Roberto Franzosi. 2010. Quantitative narrative analysis. Number 162. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jessica Hullman and Nick Diakopoulos. 2011. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2231--2240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jessica Hullman, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Eytan Adar. 2013. Contextifier: automatic generation of annotated stock visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2707--2716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stefan J"anicke, Greta Franzini, Muhammad Faisal Cheema, and Gerik Scheuermann. 2015. On close and distant reading in digital humanities: A survey and future challenges. Proc. EuroVis, Cagliari, Italy (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Matthew L. Jockers. 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary history. University of Illinois Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert Kosara and Jock Mackinlay. 2013. Storytelling: The next step for visualization. Computer 46, 5 (2013), 44--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bum Chul Kwon, Florian Stoffel, Dominik J"ackle, Bongshin Lee, and Daniel Keim. 2014. VisJockey: Enriching Data Stories through Orchestrated Interactive Visualization. In Poster Compendium of the ComputationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Journalism Symposium, Vol. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bongshin Lee, Nathalie Henry Riche, Petra Isenberg, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2015. More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories. IEEE computer graphics and applications 35, 5 (2015), 84--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Franco Moretti. 2013. Distant Reading. Verso Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chris North and Ben Shneiderman. 2000. Snap-together visualization: a user interface for coordinating visualizations via relational schemata. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. ACM, 128--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Edward Segel and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 16, 6 (2010), 1139--1148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Coupling Story to Visualization: Using Textual Analysis as a Bridge Between Data and Interpretation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IUI '18: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
        March 2018
        698 pages
        ISBN:9781450349451
        DOI:10.1145/3172944

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 March 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        IUI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate43of299submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader