skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3133071acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Exploiting User Consuming Behavior for Effective Item Tagging

Published:06 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automatic tagging techniques are important for many applications such as searching and recommendation, which has attracted many researchers' attention in recent years. Existing methods mainly rely on users' tagging behavior or items' content information for tagging, yet users' consuming behavior is ignored. In this paper, we propose to leverage such information and introduce a probabilistic model called joint-tagging LDA to improve tagging accuracy. An effective algorithm based on Zero-Order Collapsed Variational Bayes is developed. Experiments conducted on a real dataset demonstrate that joint-tagging LDA outperforms existing competing methods.

References

  1. Arthur Asuncion, Max Welling, Padhraic Smyth, and Yee Whye Teh. 2009. On smoothing and inference for topic models. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, 27--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Austin R Benson, Ravi Kumar, and Andrew Tomkins. 2016. Modeling User Consumption Sequences. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 519--529. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David M Blei and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Modeling annotated data. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval. ACM, 127--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Markus Bundschus, Shipeng Yu, Volker Tresp, Achim Rettinger, Mathaeus Dejori, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. 2009. Hierarchical bayesian models for collaborative tagging systems Data Mining, 2009. ICDM'09. Ninth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 728--733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Elena Erosheva, Stephen Fienberg, and John Lafferty. 2004. Mixed-membership models of scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 101, suppl 1 (2004), 5220--5227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tomoharu Iwata, Takeshi Yamada, and Naonori Ueda. 2009. Modeling social annotation data with content relevance using a topic model Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 835--843. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Caimei Lu, Xiaohua Hu, Xin Chen, Jung-Ran Park, TingTing He, and Zhoujun Li. 2010. The topic-perspective model for social tagging systems Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 683--692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wendy W Moe. 2003. Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. Journal of consumer psychology Vol. 13, 1--2 (2003), 29--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yashoteja Prabhu and Manik Varma. 2014. Fastxml: A fast, accurate and stable tree-classifier for extreme multi-label learning. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Daniel Ramage, David Hall, Ramesh Nallapati, and Christopher D Manning. 2009. Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, 248--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Steffen Rendle and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2010. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Xiance Si and Maosong Sun. 2009. Tag-LDA for scalable real-time tag recommendation. Journal of Computational Information Systems, Vol. 6, 1 (2009), 23--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yang Song, Lu Zhang, and C Lee Giles. 2011. Automatic tag recommendation algorithms for social recommender systems. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) Vol. 5, 1 (2011), 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yong Wu, Yuan Yao, Feng Xu, Hanghang Tong, and Jian Lu. 2016. Tag2Word: Using Tags to Generate Words for Content Based Tag Recommendation Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2287--2292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploiting User Consuming Behavior for Effective Item Tagging

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      November 2017
      2604 pages
      ISBN:9781450349185
      DOI:10.1145/3132847

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate171of855submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader