skip to main content
10.1145/3121050.3121089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access
Best Short Paper

The Pareto Frontier of Utility Models as a Framework for Evaluating Push Notification Systems

Published:01 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a utility-based framework for the evaluation of push notification systems that monitor document streams for users' topics of interest. Our starting point is that users derive either positive utility (i.e., "gain") or negative utility (i.e., "pain") from consuming system updates. By separately keeping track of these quantities, we can measure system effectiveness in a gain vs. pain tradeoff space. The Pareto Frontier of evaluated systems represents the state of the art: for each system on the frontier, no other system can offer more gain without more pain. Our framework has several advantages: it unifies three previous TREC evaluations, subsumes existing metrics, and provides more insightful analyses. Furthermore, our approach can easily accommodate more refined user models and is extensible to different information-seeking modalities.

References

  1. James Allan. 2002. Topic Detection and Tracking: Event-Based Information Organization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Javed Aslam, Matthew Ekstrand-Abueg, Virgil Pavlu, Richard McCreadie, Fernando Diaz, and Tetsuya Sakai 2014. TREC 2014 Temporal Summarization Track Overview TREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Javed Aslam, Matthew Ekstrand-Abueg, Virgil Pavlu, Fernando Diaz, and Tetsuya Sakai. 2013. TREC 2013 Temporal Summarization. In TREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Leif Azzopardi. 2016. Simulation of Interaction: A Tutorial on Modelling and Simulating User Interaction and Search Behaviour. In SIGIR. 1227--1230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leif Azzopardi, Kalervo Jarvelin, Jaap Kamps, and Mark D. Smucker 2011. Report on the SIGIR 2010 Workshop on the Simulation of Interaction. SIGIR Forum, Vol. 44, 2 (2011), 35--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gaurav Baruah, Mark D. Smucker, and Charles L. A. Clarke. 2015. Evaluating Streams of Evolving News Events. In SIGIR. 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Charles L. A. Clarke and Mark D. Smucker 2014. Time Well Spent IIiX '14. 205--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Qi Guo, Fernando Diaz, and Elad Yom-Tov 2013. Updating Users about Time Critical Events. In ECIR. 483--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Heikki Keskustalo, Kalervo Jarvelin, Ari Pirkola, and Jaana Kekalainen 2008. Intuition-Supporting Visualization of User's Performance Based on Explicit Negative Higher-Order Relevance. In SIGIR. 675--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. David D. Lewis. 1995. The TREC-4 Filtering Track. In TREC. 165--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jimmy Lin, Miles Efron, Yulu Wang, and Garrick Sherman. 2015. Overview of the TREC-2015 Microblog Track. TREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jimmy Lin, Adam Roegiest, Luchen Tan, Richard McCreadie, Ellen Voorhees, and Fernando Diaz. 2016. Overview of the TREC 2016 Real-Time Summarization Track TREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David Maxwell, Leif Azzopardi, Kalervo Jarvelin, and Heikki Keskustalo 2015. Searching and Stopping: An Analysis of Stopping Rules and Strategies CIKM. 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alistair Moffat and Justin Zobel 2008. Rank-Biased Precision for Measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness. ACM TOIS, Vol. 27, 1, Article 2 (Dec. 2008), 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Pareto Frontier of Utility Models as a Framework for Evaluating Push Notification Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICTIR '17: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval
        October 2017
        348 pages
        ISBN:9781450344906
        DOI:10.1145/3121050

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        ICTIR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate27of54submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate209of482submissions,43%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader