skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025652acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pineal: Bringing Passive Objects to Life with Embedded Mobile Devices

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive, smart objects-customized to individuals and uses-are central to many movements, such as tangibles, the internet of things (IoT), and ubiquitous computing. Yet, rapid prototyping both the form and function of these custom objects can be problematic, particularly for those with limited electronics or programming experience. Designers often need to embed custom circuitry; program its workings; and create a form factor that not only reflects the desired user experience but can also house the required circuitry and electronics. To mitigate this, we created Pineal, a design tool that lets end-users: (1) modify 3D models to include a smart watch or phone as its heart; (2) specify high-level interactive behaviours through visual programming; and (3) have the phone or watch act out such behaviours as the objects' "smarts". Furthermore, a series of prototypes show how Pineal exploits mobile sensing and output, and automatically generates 3D printed form-factors for rich, interactive, objects.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2053-file3.mp4

mp4

69.1 MB

pn2053p.mp4

mp4

3.1 MB

p2583-ledo.mp4

mp4

174.6 MB

References

  1. Daniel Ashbrook, Patrick Baudisch, and Sean White. 2011. Nenya: Subtle and Eyes-free Mobile Input with a Magnetically-tracked Finger Ring. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2043--2046. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Martin Azizyan, Ionut Constandache, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2009. SurroundSense: mobile phone localization via ambience fingerprinting. Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, ACM, 261--272. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1614350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Patrick Baudisch, Torsten Becker, and Frederik Rudeck. 2010. Lumino: Tangible Blocks for Tabletop Computers Based on Glass Fiber Bundles. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1165--1174. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753500 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tracey Booth, Simone Stumpf, Jon Bird, and Sara Jones. 2016. Crossed Wires: Investigating the Problems of End-User Developers in a Physical Computing Task. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3485--3497. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858533Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anthony Chen, Stelian Coros, Jennifer Mankoff, and Scott Hudson E. 2015. Encore: 3D Printed Augmentation of Everyday Objects with Printed-Over, Affixed and Interlocked Attachments. To appear in Proceedings of the ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Anthony Chen, Jeeun Kim, Jennifer Mankoff, Tovi Grossman, Stelian Coros, and Scott Hudson. 2016. Reprise: A Design Tool for Specifying, Generating, and Customizing 3D Printable Adaptations on Everyday Objects. ACM UIST. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sean Follmer, David Carr, Emily Lovell, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. CopyCAD: Remixing Physical Objects with Copy and Paste from the Real World. Adjunct Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 381--382. http://doi.org/10.1145/1866218.1866230Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sean Follmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 2012. KidCAD: digitally remixing toys through tangible tools. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2401--2410. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208403 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sidhant Gupta, Daniel Morris, Shwetak Patel, and Desney Tan. 2012. SoundWave: Using the Doppler Effect to Sense Gestures. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1911--1914. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208331 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John Harris, Stephanie Law, Kazuki Takashima, Ehud Sharlin, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2014. Calamaro: Perceiving Robotic Motion in the Wild. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human-agent Interaction, ACM, 59--66. http://doi.org/10.1145/2658861.2658891 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Stephanie Houde and Charles Hill. 1997. What do prototypes prototype. Handbook of human-computer interaction 2: 367--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nathaniel Hudson, Celena Alcock, and Parmit K. Chilana. 2016. Understanding Newcomers to 3D Printing: Motivations, Workflows, and Barriers of Casual Makers. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 384--396. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858266 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gierad Laput, Eric Brockmeyer, Moshe Mahler, Scott E. Hudson, and Chris Harrison. 2015. Acoustruments: Passive, Acoustically-driven, Interactive Controls for Handheld Devices. ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 Emerging Technologies, ACM, 3:1--3:1. http://doi.org/10.1145/2782782.2792490Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Patrick Lazik and Anthony Rowe. 2012. Indoor pseudo-ranging of mobile devices using ultrasonic chirps. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, ACM, 99--112. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2426667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Ohbuchi, H. Hanaizumi, and L. A. Hock. 2004. Barcode readers using the camera device in mobile phones. 2004 International Conference on Cyberworlds, 260--265. http://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2004.23 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Makoto Ono, Buntarou Shizuki, and Jiro Tanaka. 2013. Touch & Activate: Adding Interactivity to Existing Objects Using Active Acoustic Sensing. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 31--40. http://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2501989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jifei Ou, Gershon Dublon, Chin-Yi Cheng, Felix Heibeck, Karl Willis, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. Cilllia: 3D Printed Micro-Pillar Structures for Surface Texture, Actuation and Sensing. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 5753--5764. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858257 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Raf Ramakers, Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2016. RetroFab: A Design Tool for Retrofitting Physical Interfaces Using Actuators, Sensors and 3D Printing. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 409--419. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858485 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Munehiko Sato, Ivan Poupyrev, and Chris Harrison. 2012. Touché: Enhancing Touch Interaction on Humans, Screens, Liquids, and Everyday Objects. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 483--492. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207743 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Valkyrie Savage. 2016. Fabbed to Sense: Integrated Design of Geometry and Sensing Algorithms for Interactive Objects.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Valkyrie Savage, Colin Chang, and Björn Hartmann. 2013. Sauron: Embedded Single-camera Sensing of Printed Physical User Interfaces. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 447--456. http://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2501992 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, Jingyi Li, and Björn Hartmann. 2015. Makers' Marks: Physical Markup for Designing and Fabricating Functional Objects. Proceedings of User Interfaces and Software Technology.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Valkyrie Savage, Andrew Head, Björn Hartmann, Dan B. Goldman, Gautham Mysore, and Wilmot Li. 2015. Lamello: Passive Acoustic Sensing for Tangible Input Components. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1277--1280. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702207 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Valkyrie Savage, Ryan Schmidt, Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, and Björn Hartmann. 2014. A Series of Tubes: Adding Interactivity to 3D Prints Using Internal Pipes. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 3--12. http://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647374 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Valkyrie Savage, Xiaohan Zhang, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Midas: Fabricating Custom Capacitive Touch Sensors to Prototype Interactive Objects. Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 579--588. http://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380189 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Martin Schmitz, Mohammadreza Khalilbeigi, Matthias Balwierz, Roman Lissermann, Max Mühlhäuser, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. Capricate: A Fabrication Pipeline to Design and 3D Print Capacitive Touch Sensors for Interactive Objects. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, ACM, 253--258. http://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807503 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jeremy Scott, David Dearman, Koji Yatani, and Khai N. Truong. 2010. Sensing Foot Gestures from the Pocket. Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 199--208. http://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866063 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. E. Short, K. Swift-Spong, J. Greczek, et al. 2014. How to train your DragonBot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play. The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 924--929. http://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Alexander Teibrich, Stefanie Mueller, Francois Guimbretiere, Robert Kovacs, Stefan Neubert, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Patching Physical Objects. To appear in Proceedings of the ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Thingiverse.com. MakerBot Thingiverse. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://www.thingiverse.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Christian Weichel, Manfred Lau, and Hans Gellersen. 2013. Enclosed: A Component-centric Interface for Designing Prototype Enclosures. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 215--218. http://doi.org/10.1145/2460625.2460659 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Christian Weichel, Manfred Lau, David Kim, Nicolas Villar, and Hans W. Gellersen. 2014. MixFab: A Mixed-reality Environment for Personal Fabrication. Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3855--3864. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557090 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. M. Weiss, R. Jennings, R. Khoshabeh, et al. 2009. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. ACM, 3229--3234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Shota Yamanaka and Homei Miyashita. 2014. Vibkinesis: Notification by Direct Tap and "Dying Message" Using Vibronic Movement Controllable Smartphones. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 535--540. http://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647365 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Neng-Hao Yu, Sung-Sheng Tsai, I-Chun Hsiao, et al. 2011. Clip-on Gadgets: Expanding Multi-touch Interaction Area with Unpowered Tactile Controls. Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 367--372. http://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047243 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Smartboy Development Kit. Hyperkin Lab. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://hyperkinlab.com/smartboy-development-kit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Industrial Fiber Optics. Retrieved September 21, 2016 from http://www.i-fiberoptics.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Google Cardboard - Google VR. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from https://vr.google.com/cardboard/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Cycloramic. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://www.cycloramic.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. 3D Models for Professionals: TurboSquid. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://www.turbosquid.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Pineal: Bringing Passive Objects to Life with Embedded Mobile Devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader