skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025507acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Priming Drivers before Handover in Semi-Autonomous Cars

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Semi-autonomous vehicles occasionally require control to be handed over to the driver in situations where the vehicle is unable to operate safely. Currently, such handover requests require the driver to take control almost instantaneously. We investigate how auditory pre-alerts that occur well before the handover request impact the success of the handover in a dual task scenario. In a study with a driving simulator, drivers perform tasks on their phone while the car is in an autonomous mode. They receive a repeated burst audio pre-alert or an increasing pulse audio pre-alert preceding the standard warning for immediate handover. Results show that pre-alerts caused people to look more at the road before the handover occurred, and to disengage from the secondary task earlier, compared to when there was no pre-alert. This resulted in safer handover situations. Increasing pulse pre-alerts show particular promise due to their communication of urgency. Our detailed analysis informs the design and evaluation of alerts in safety-critical systems with automation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1307p.mp4

mp4

1.2 MB

p392-van-der-heiden.mp4

mp4

203.9 MB

References

  1. Hakan Alm and Lena Nilsson. 1995. The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behavior in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(5), 707--715. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/00014575(95)00026-VGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Erik M. Altmann and J. Gregory Trafton. 2002. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 39--83. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00058--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brian P. Bailey and Shamsi T. Iqbal. 2008. Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14(4), 1--28. http://doi.org/10.1145/1314683.1314689 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brian P. Bailey and John Konstan. 2006. On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 685--708. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. David Beattie, Lynne Baillie, and Martin Halvey. 2015. A comparison of artificial driving sounds for automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). NY, NY: ACM, 451--462. http://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807519 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Deborah A. Boehm-Davis and Roger W. Remington. 2009. Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: a cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(5), 1124--1129. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.029 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jelmer P. Borst, Niels A. Taatgen, Hedderik van Rijn. 2010. The Problem State: A Cognitive Bottleneck in Multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 363--382. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018106 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jelmer P. Borst, Niels A. Taatgen, Hedderik van Rijn. 2015. What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, NY, NY: ACM, 2971--2980. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702156 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Valdimar Briem and Leif R. Hedman. 1995. Behavioral effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics, 38, 2536--2562. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925285 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Karel Brookhuis, Gerbrand De Vries, Dick De Waard, 1991. The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 309--316. http://doi.org/10.1016/0001--4575(91)90008-SGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Duncan P. Brumby, Andrew Howes, Dario D. Salvucci. 2007. A cognitive constraint model of dualtask trade-offs in a highly dynamic driving task. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, NY, NY: ACM, 233--242. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240664 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Duncan P. Brumby, Dario D. Salvucci, Andrew Howes. 2009. Focus on Driving: How Cognitive Constraints Shape the Adaptation of Strategy when Dialing while Driving, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, NY, NY: ACM, 1629--1638. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518950 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jeff K Caird, Chelsea R Willness, Piers Steel, Chip T Scialfa. 2008. A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1282--1293. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yujia Cao, Sandro Castronovo, Angela Mahr, Christian Müller. 2016. On timing and modality choice with local danger warnings for drivers, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen, Germany, 75--78. http://doi.org/10.1145/1620509.1620524 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Geoff Cumming. 2013. Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and metaanalysis. NY, NY: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joost de Winter, Riender Happee, Marieke Martens, Neville Stanton. 2014. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 196--217. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Thomas A. Dingus, Feng Guo, Suzie Lee, Jonathan F. Antin, Miguel Perez, Mindy Buchanan-King, Jonathan Hankey. 2016. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2636--2641. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513271113 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Johan Fagerlönn, Stefan Lindberg, and Anna Sirkka. 2012. Graded auditory warnings during in-vehicle use: using sound to guide drivers without additional noise. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '12). NY, NY: ACM, 85--91. http://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390269 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tom M. Gasser and Daniel Westhoff. 2012. BAStstudy: Definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. Presented at the Presentation at the Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, Irvine, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Christian Gold, Daniel Dambock, Lutz Lorenz and Klaus Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 1938--1942. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ellen C. Haas and John G. Casali. 1993. The perceived urgency and detection time of multi-tone and frequency modulated warning signals. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 37th annual meeting, Santa Monica, CA, USA, 544548. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925270 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Peter A. Hancock. 2013. Driven to distraction and back again. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, & T. W. Victor (Eds.), Driver distraction and inattention advances in research and countermeasures. Chichester, UK, 9--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. William J. Horrey and Chris D. Wickens. 2006. Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48(1), 196--205. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872006776412135 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Barbara Illowsky and Susan L. Dean. 2008. Collaborative Statistics, Connexions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shamsi T. Iqbal, Eric Horvitz, Yun-Cheng Ju, Ella Mathews. 2011. Hang on a sec!: effects of proactive mediation of phone conversations while driving. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, NY, NY: ACM, 463--472. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Shamsi T. Iqbal, Yun-Cheng Ju, Eric Horvitz. 2010. Cars, calls, and cognition: investigating driving and divided attention In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, NY, NY: ACM, 1281--1290. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753518 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Christian P. Janssen and Duncan P. Brumby. 2010. Strategic Adaptation to Performance Objectives in a Dual-Task Setting. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 15481560. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551--6709.2010.01124.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Christian P. Janssen, Duncan P. Brumby, Rae Garnett. 2012. Natural Break Points The Influence of Priorities and Cognitive and Motor Cues on Dual-Task Interleaving. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(1), 5--29. http://doi.org/10.1177/1555343411432339 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Christian P. Janssen, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Yuncheng Ju. 2014. Sharing a Driver's Context with a Caller via Continuous Audio Cues to Increase Awareness about Driver State. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(3), 270. http://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000020 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Myounghoon Jeon, Thomas M Gable, Benjamin K Davison, Michael A Nees, Jeff Wilson and Bruce N. Walker. 2015. Menu navigation with in-vehicle technologies: Auditory menu cues improve dual task performance, preference, and workload. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(1), 1--16. http://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.925774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sheila G. Klauer, Feng Guo, Bruce G. SimonsMorton, Marie Claude Ouimet, Suzanne E. Lee and Thomas A. Dingus. 2014. Distracted Driving and Risk of Road Crashes among Novice and Experienced Drivers. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(1), 5459. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1204142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jeamin Koo, Jungsuk Kwac, Wendy Ju, Martin Steinert, Larry Leifer and Clifford Nass. 2014. Why did my car just do that? Explaining semiautonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 1--7. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12008-014-0227--2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. John D Lee, Brent Caven, Steven Haake and Timothy L Brown. 2001. Speech-based Interaction with Invehicle Computers: The Effect of Speech-based E-mail on Driver's attention to the Roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631--640. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775870340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Angela Mahr, Margarita Pentcheva, Christian Müller. 2009. Towards system-mediated car passenger communication, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen, Germany 79--80. http://doi.org/10.1145/1620509.1620525 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Daniel C. McFarlane. 2002. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 17(1), 63--139. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Alexander Meschtscherjakov, David Wilfinger, Thomas Scherndl, Manfred Tscheligi. 2009. Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour, In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen, Germany, 8188. http://doi.org/10.1145/1620509.1620526 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer and Joseph F Coughlin. 2012. Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: an on-road study across three age groups. Human Factors, 54(3), 396--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Todd A. Mondor and G.A. Finley. 2013. The perceived urgency of auditory warning alarms used in the hospital operating room is inappropriate. Candian Journal of anaesthesia, 50, 221--228. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03017788Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2013. Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Frederik Naujoks, Christoph Mai and Alexandra Neukum. 2014.The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, 431--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, Frank Pollick. 2014. Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing System, NY, NY: ACM, 2067--4076. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, Frank Pollick. 2014. Speech tactons improve speech warnings for drivers. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, NY, NY: ACM, 1--8. http://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667318 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, Frank Pollick. 2013. Evaluating multimodal driver displays of varying urgency. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, NY, NY: ACM, 92--99. http://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516543 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, Frank Pollick. 2015. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15), NY, NY: ACM, 3--10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799262 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Donald A. Redelmeier and Robert J. Tibshirani. 2009. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453--458. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199702133360701 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Nick Reed and R. Robbins. 2008. The Effect of Text Messaging on Driver Behavior: A Simulator Study Transport Research Lab Report, PPR 367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. SAE International. 2014. J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. Retrieved from http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201401/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Dario D. Salvucci. 2005. A Multitasking General Executive for Compound Continuous Tasks. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 457--492. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_19 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Dario D. Salvucci and Peter Bogunovich. 2010. Multitasking and Monotasking: The Effects of Mental Workload on Deferred Task Interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, NY, NY: ACM, 85--88. http://doi.org/ 10.1145/1753326.1753340 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Dario D. Salvucci and Niels A. Taatgen. 2011. The Multitasking Mind. NY, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Dario D. Salvucci, Daniel Markley, Mark Zuber, Duncan P. Brumby, 2007. iPod distraction: effects of portable music-player use on driver performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, NY, NY: ACM, 243--250. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240665 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. David L Strayer, Joel M Cooper, Jonna Turrill, James R Coleman and Rachel J Hopman. 2015. Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile III: A Comparison of Ten 2015 In-Vehicle Information Systems, 1--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Chris Urmson, (2015, May 11). The View from the Front Seat of the Google Self-Driving Car. Medium.com. Retrieved from https://medium.com/backchannel/the-view-from-thefront-seat-of-the-google-self-driving-car-46fc9f3e6088Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Marcel Walch, Kristin Lange, Martin Baumann and Michael Weber. 2015. Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, NY, NY: ACM 11--18. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799268 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Chris D. Wickens. 2008. Multiple Resources and Mental Workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449--455. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Wolfe M. Jeremy, Todd S. Horowitz, Michael J. Van Wert, Naomi M. Kenner, Skyler S. Place, and Nour Kibbi. 2007. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 623. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096--3445.136.4.623Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Priming Drivers before Handover in Semi-Autonomous Cars

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2017
            7138 pages
            ISBN:9781450346559
            DOI:10.1145/3025453

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 May 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader