Leonardo Angelini
Omar Abou Khaled
Denis Lalanne
ABSTRACT
This paper compares an emergent interaction modality for the In-Vehicle Infotainment System (IVIS), i.e., gesturing on the steering wheel, with two more popular modalities in modern cars: touch in the central dashboard and speech. We conducted a between-subjects experiment with 20 participants for each modality to assess the interaction performance with the IVIS and the impact on the driving performance. Moreover, we compared the three modalities in terms of usability, subjective workload and emotional response. The results showed no statically significant differences between the three interaction modalities regarding the various indicators for the driving task performance, while significant differences were found in measures of IVIS interaction performance: users performed less interactions to complete the secondary tasks with the speech modality, while, in average, a lower task completion time was registered with the touch modality. The three interfaces were comparable in terms of perceived usability, mental workload and emotional response.
- Leonardo Angelini, Francesco Carrino, Stefano Carrino, Maurizio Caon, Omar Abou Khaled, Jürgen Baumgartner, Andreas Sonderegger, Denis Lalanne, and Elena Mugellini. 2014. Gesturing on the Steering Wheel: a User-elicited taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--8. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667414 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Leonardo Angelini, Francesco Carrino, Stefano Carrino, Maurizio Caon, Denis Lalanne, Omar Abou Khaled, and Elena Mugellini. 2013. Opportunistic synergy: a classifier fusion engine for micro-gesture recognition. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 30--37. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516563 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth Majlund Bach, Mads Gregers Jæger, Mikael B. Skov, and Nils Gram Thomassen. 2008. You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1139--1148. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357233 Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Brooke. 1996. SUS - A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189--194.Google Scholar
- Tanja Döring, Dagmar Kern, Paul Marshall, Max Pfeiffer, Johannes Schöning, Volker Gruhn, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 483--492. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979010 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christoph Endres, Tim Schwartz, and Christian A. Müller. 2011. "Geremin": 2D microgestures for drivers based on electric field sensing. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--330. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1943403.1943457 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank Flemisch, Anna Schieben, Johann Kelsch, and Christian Löper. 2008. Automation spectrum, inner/outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation. Human Factors for assistance and automation, 1--16.Google Scholar
- Iván E. González, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Duen Horng Chau, Andrew Faulring, and Brad A. Myers. 2007. Eyes on the road, hands on the wheel: thumb-based interaction techniques for input on steering wheels. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2007 (GI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 95--102. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1268517.1268535. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra G. Hart, and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in psychology, 52, pp.139--183.Google Scholar
- Jibo He, Alex Chaparro, Bobby Nguyen, Rondell Burge, Joseph Crandall, Barbara Chaparro, Rui Ni, and Shi Cao. 2013. Texting while driving: is speech-based texting less risky than handheld texting?. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 124--130. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516560. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. F. Kelley. 1984. An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2, 1 (January 1984), 26--41. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/357417.357420 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shunsuke Koyama, Yuta Sugiura, Masa Ogata, Anusha Withana, Yuji Uema, Makoto Honda, Sayaka Yoshizu, Chihiro Sannomiya, Kazunari Nawa, and Masahiko Inami. 2014. Multi-touch steering wheel for in-car tertiary applications using infrared sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 4 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2582051.2582056. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Lewis, and Jeff Sauro. 2009. The factor structure of the system usability scale. Human centered design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 94--103. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Victor Ei-Wen Lo, and Paul A. Green. 2013. Development and evaluation of automotive speech interfaces: useful information from the human factors and the related literature. International Journal of Vehicular Technology, 2013.Google Scholar
- Jannette Maciej, and Mark Vollrath. 2009. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(5), 924--930.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stefan Mattes. 2003. The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future, 57--60.Google Scholar
- Eve Mitsopoulos-Rubens, Margaret J. Trotter, and Michael G. Lenné. 2011. Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: A comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. Applied ergonomics, 42(4), 583--591.Google Scholar
- Meredith Ringel Morris, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2010. Understanding users' preferences for surface gestures. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (GI '10). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 261--268. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Annie Pauzié. 2008. A Method to Assess the Driver Mental Workload: The Driving Activity Load Index (DALI). IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2(4), 315--322.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bastian Pfleging, Stefan Schneegass, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Multimodal interaction in the car: combining speech and gestures on the steering wheel. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 155--162. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390282. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urs Schallenberger. 2005. Kurzskalen zur Erfassung der Positiven Aktivierung, Negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVAKS). Zürich: Fachrichtung Angewandte Psychologie des Psychologischen Institutes der Universität.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Implementation and Evaluation of Touch and Gesture Interaction Modalities for In-vehicle Infotainment Systems
Image and GraphicsAbstractThe arrival of the Internet of Vehicles has promoted the transformation of in-vehicle human-computer interaction. As a new way of human-computer interaction, gesture interaction plays an important role in such interaction and technology update. ...
Comparison of gestural, touch, and mouse interaction with Fitts' law
OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, CollaborationWe present preliminary results of an experiment to compare gestural, touch, and mouse interaction using Fitts' law. A total of 15 participants were asked to select 100 targets as quickly and accurately as possible using each technique. Selection of ...
The impact of drowsiness on in-vehicle human-machine interaction with head-up and head-down displays
Various studies show that drowsiness reduces driver alertness and can significantly affect driver performance. In this paper, we investigate the effect of drowsiness on the interaction with the in-vehicle infotainment system (IVIS) while driving. The ...
Comments