ABSTRACT
Over the last years there has been a great increase on the number of freely available legal resources. Portals that allow users to search for legislation, using keywords are now a common place. However, in the vast majority of those portals, legal documents are not stored in a structured format with a rich set of meta data, but in presentation oriented manifestation, making impossible for the end users to inquiry semantics about the documents, such as date of enactment, date of repeal, jurisdiction, etc. or to reuse information and establish an interconnection with similar repositories. In this paper, we present an approach for extracting a machine readable semantic representation of legislation, from unstructured document formats. Our method exploits common formats of legal documents to identify blocks of structural and semantic information and models them according to a popular legal meta-schema. Our proposed method is highly extensible and achieves high accuracy for a variety of legal and para legal documents, especially legislation. Our evaluation results reveal that our methodology can be of great assistance for the automatic structuring and semantic indexing of legal resources.
- T. Agnoloni, E. Francesconi, and P. Spinosa. xmlegeseditor: an opensource visual xml editor for supporting legal national standards. In Proceedings of the V legislative XML workshop, pages 239--251, 2007.Google Scholar
- L. Bacci, P. Spinosa, C. Marchetti, R. Battistoni, I. Florence, I. Senate, and I. Rome. Automatic mark-up of legislative documents and its application to parallel text generation. In Proceedings of LOAIT Workshop, pages 45--54, 2009.Google Scholar
- G. Barabucci, L. Cervone, M. Palmirani, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. Multi-layer markup and ontological structures in akoma ntoso. In AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue, pages 133--149. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. R. Benjamins, P. Casanovas, J. Breuker, and A. Gangemi. Law and the semantic web, an introduction. In Law and the Semantic Web, pages 1--17. Springer, 2005. Google Scholar
- T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila, et al. The semantic web. Scientific american, 284(5):28--37, 2001. Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Boer, R. Winkels, and F. Vitali. Metalex xml and the legal knowledge interchange format. In Computable models of the law, pages 21--41. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Carroll, T. Briscoe, and A. Sanfilippo. Parser evaluation: a survey and a new proposal. In Proceedings of LREC '98, pages 447--454, 1998.Google Scholar
- I. Chalkidis. Nomothesi@: Greek Legislation Platform. Bachelor thesis, University of Athens, 2014.Google Scholar
- E. Evans. Domain-driven design: tackling complexity in the heart of software. Addison-Wesley, 2004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Ford. Parsing expression grammars: a recognition-based syntactic foundation. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, volume 39, pages 111--122, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Fowler. Domain-specific languages. Pearson Education, 2010.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Garofalakis, K. Plessas, and A. Plessas. Automated analysis of greek legislative texts for version control: limitations, caveats and challenges. In Proceedings of the 19th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, pages 115--116, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Igari, A. Shimazu, and K. Ochimizu. Document structure analysis with syntactic model and parsers: Application to legal judgments. In JSAI International Symposium on A.I., pages 126--140, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. Koniaris. Organization, management and retrieval of law sources by utilizing technologies of the semantic web. Master's thesis, Hellenic Open University, 2012.Google Scholar
- C. F. Lima JAO. LexML Brasil, Parte 3 - LexML XML Schema, version 1.0. Technical report, 2008.Google Scholar
- Q. Lu, J. G. Conrad, K. Al-Kofahi, and W. Keenan. Legal document clustering with built-in topic segmentation. In Proceedings of CIKM '11, pages 383--392, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Lupo, F. Vitali, E. Francesconi, M. Palmirani, R. Winkels, E. de Maat, A. Boer, and P. Mascellani. ESTRELLA Project, Deliverable D3.1 - General XML format(s) for legal Sources, version 1.0. Technical report, 2007.Google Scholar
- A. Marchetti, F. Megale, E. Seta, and F. Vitali. Using xml as a means to access legislative documents: Italian and foreign experiences. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review, 10(1):54--62, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Palmirani and R. Brighi. An xml editor for legal information management. In International Conference on Electronic Government, pages 421--429, 2003. Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Parr. Language implementation patterns: create your own domain-specific and general programming languages. Pragmatic Bookshelf, 2009.Google Scholar
- T. Parr, S. Harwell, and K. Fisher. Adaptive ll (*) parsing: the power of dynamic analysis. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, volume 49, pages 579--598, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I.-P. Union. World e-Parliament Report 2010. 2010. http://www.ictparliament.org/wepr2010.html.Google Scholar
- S. Van De Ven, R. Hoekstra, R. Winkels, E. de Maat, and Á. Kollár. Metavex: Regulation drafting meets the semantic web. In Computable Models of the Law, pages 42--55. Springer, 2008.Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Semantic indexing of legal documents
Semantic Processing of Legal TextsAutomated semantic indexing may be the answer to insufficient recall of legal information systems. The semantic web has created powerful tools for mark-up and ontological representation. Re-use in legal applications remains low due to inappropriate ...
A project for the transformation of greek legal documents into legal open data
PCI '18: Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on InformaticsIn modern states, the operation of the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) results in the generation of a huge volume of data (e.g. legislative documents, decisions, reports, statistics etc.). Publication of government ...
Acceptable Legal Standards for Software
The author discusses the legal issues that are involved in software protection. She discusses legal actions open to users who get a system that does not perform as expected and have exhausted all remedies that do not involve litigation. She examines how ...
Comments