skip to main content
10.1145/2998626.2998667acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinteraccionConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SUSApp: A Mobile App for Measuring and Comparing Questionnaire-Based Usability Assessments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Usability questionnaires are one of the most used methods to measure usability in terms of the user's subjective satisfaction. However, most of the usability questionnaires do not provide a complete environment to store measurements and compare different usability values of application categories and versions over the long term, which makes it difficult to study the usability of a software product or even the usability of different versions of such products over time, hindering the facility to obtain comparisons and thresholds in usability measurements for different product lines. In this paper we present SUSApp, a tool conceived for the analysis of usability through the SUS (System Usability Scale) questionnaire, which is one of the most popular ones. This tool was conceived for mobile platforms, and it is intended to easily analyze usability by storing and recovering past evaluations, and allowing to statistically compare usability measurements among different software products and applications categories. In addition, a user testing is presented. This has provided acceptable usability results concerning SUSApp in an experiment with real users.

References

  1. Baldassarri, S., Macías, J.A., and Urquiza, J. 2014. Trending Breakthroughs in Human-Computer Interaction. Journal of Universal Computer Science. 20, 7 (July 2014), 941--1045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bangor, A. W. 2000. Display technology and ambient illumination influences on visual fatigue at VDT workstations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooke, J. 1996. SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A.L. McClellands. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A. and Norman, K.L., 1988. Development of an Instrument Measuring User Satisfaction of the Human-Computer Interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'88). ACM, New York, NY 213--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3 (Sep. 1989), 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Everett, S. P., Byrne, M. D., and Greene, K. K. 2006. Measuring the usability of paper ballots: Efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA 2547--2551.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ISO 9241-11:1998. International Standard. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability. ISO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewis, C. 1982. Using the "thinking aloud" method in cognitive interface design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, J.R. 1995. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, 1 (January 1995), 57--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lund, A. 2001. Measuring usability with the USE Questionnaire. Usability Interface. 8, 2, 3--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Macías, J.A. Granollers, T. and Latorre, P. 2009. New Trends on Human-Computer Interaction: Research, Development, New Tools and Methods. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. QUIS Questionnaire. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from The Laboratory for Automation Psychology and Decision Processes Web Page: http://lap.umd.edu/quis/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sauro, J. 2011. Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Retrieved June 21, 2016 from: http://www.measuringusability.com/sus.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. SUMI Questionnaire. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from SUMI Web Page: http://sumi.ucc.ie/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tullis, T. and Albert W. 2008. Measuring the User Experience. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. USE Questionnaire. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from Gary Perlman's Web Page on User Interface Usability Evaluation with Web-Based Questionnaires: http://garyperlman.com/quest/quest.cgi?form=USE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. WAMMI Questionnaire. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from WAMMI Web Page: http://www.wammi.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. SUSApp: A Mobile App for Measuring and Comparing Questionnaire-Based Usability Assessments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Interacción '16: Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction
      September 2016
      197 pages

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate109of163submissions,67%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader