skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998251acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What Did I Ask You to Do, by When, and for Whom?: Passion and Compassion in Request Management

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Request management occurs at an intersection of CSCW and personal information management (i.e., to-do management), with particular emphasis on social relationships and organizational accountability. We explore diverse work practices and representations for person-to-person requests in organizations, detailing the scatter of communications channels, difficulty of aggregation and prioritization, differences due to context, and the sometimes extraordinary effort and passion that knowledge workers expend on this part of their work, as well as the compassion with which they view their colleagues' efforts. We close with a proposal for the study of socially implicated objects in physical and/or virtual organizations, and implications for the design of services to support request management.

References

  1. Karen S. Baker and Florence Millerand. 2007. Articulation work supporting information infrastructure design: Coordination, categorization, and assessment in practice. Proc. HICSS 2007, 242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jakob E. Bardram and Claus Bossen. 2005. A web of coordinative artifacts: Collaboration work in a hospital ward. Proc. GROUP 2005, 168--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Deborah Barreau, Robert Capra, Susan Dumais, William James, and Manuel Pérez-Quiñones. 2008. Introduction to keeping, refinding and sharing personal information. TOIS 26(4), Art. 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Deborah Barreau and Bonnie A. Nardi. 1995. Finding and reminding: File organization on the desktop. SIGCHI Bul. 27(3), 39--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Victoria Bellotti, Brinda Dalal, Nathaniel Good, Peter Flynn, Daniel G. Bobrow, and Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2004. What a to-do: Studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager. Proc. CHI 2004, 735--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Victoria Bellotti, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Mark Howard, and Ian Smith. 2003. Taking email to task: The design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool. Proc. CHI 2003, 345--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Johan Berndtsson and Maria Normark. 1999. The coordinative functions of flight strips: Air traffic control work revisieted. Proc. GROUP 1999, 101--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pernille Bjørn and Lars Rune Christensen. 2011. Relation work: Creating socio-technical connections in global engineering. Proc ECSCW 2011, 133--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cristian Bogdan. 2003. IT design for amateur communities. PhD. Thesis, KTH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Peter H. Carstensen and Morten Nielsen. 2001. Characterizing modes of coordination: A comparison between oral and artifact based coordination. Proc. GROUP 2001, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lars Rune Christensen. 2008. The logic of practices of stigmergy: Representational artifacts in architectural design. Proc. CSCW 2008, 559--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mary Czerwinski. 2011. The future of distributed groups and their use of social media. Proc. INTERACT 2011, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Ditte Amund Basballe. 2014. Emergent boundary objects and boundary zones in collaborative design research projects. Proc. DIS 2014, 745--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Elizabeth M. Daly, Werner Geyer, and David R. Millen. 2010. The network effects of recommending social connections. Proc. RecSys 2010, 301--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joan DiMicco, David R. Millen, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Beth Brownholtz, and Michael Muller. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work, Proc. CSCW 2008, 711--720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nicolas Ducheneaut and Victoria Bellotti. 2001. Email as habitat. Interactions 8(5), 30--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Casey Dugan, Michael Muller, David R. Millen, Werner Geyer, Beth Brownholtz, and Marty Moore. 2007. The dogear game: A social bookmark recommender system. Proc. GROUP 2007, 387--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lilla Efimova and Jonathan Grudin. 2007. Crossing boundaries: A case study employee blogging, Proc. HICSS 2007, 86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kate Ehrlich, Michael Muller, Tara Matthews, Ido Guy, and Inbal Ronen. 2014. What motivates members to contribute to enterprise online communities? CSCW Companion 2014, 149--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kate Ehrlich and N. Sadat Shami. 2010. Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. Proc. ICWSM '10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. David Elsweiler, Ian Ruthven, and Christopher Jones. 2007. Towards memory supporting personal information management tools. JASIST 58(7), 924--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Fernando Flores, Michael Graves, Brad Hartfield, and Terry Winograd. 1988. Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM TOIS 6(2), 153--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Louise Færgemann, Teresa Schilder-Knudsen, and Peter H. Carstensen. 2005. The duality of articulation work in large heterogeneous settings -- A study in health care. Proc. ECSCW 2005, 163--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Elihu M. Gerson and Susan Leigh Star. 1986. Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM TOIS 4(3), 257--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Victor M. González and Gloria Mark. 2004. Constant constant multi-tasking craziness: Managing multiple working spheres. Proc. CHI 2004, 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jacek Gwizdka. 2004. Email task management styles: The cleaners and the keepers. Proc. CHI 2004, 12351238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jacek Gwizdka. 2002. Reinventing the inbox -- Supporting the management of pending tasks in email. Proc. CHI 2002, 550--551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jacek Gwizdka. 2001.Supporting prospective information in email. CHI EA 2001, 135--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jacek Gwizdka and Marc Chignell. 2007. Individual differences. In William P. Jones and Jaime Teevan (eds), Personal information management. UW Press, 206--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Richard H.R. Harper and John A. Hughes. 1993. What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and expect us to stop 'em hitting: Managing technology work in air traffic control. In G. Button (ed.), Technology in working order. Studies of work, interaction, and technology. Routledge, 127--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Beverly L. Harrison, Alex Cozzi, and Thomas P. Moran. 2005. Roles and relationships for unified activity management. Proc. GROUP 2005, 236--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 1992. Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London's Underground control rooms. CSCW 1(12), 69--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lester J. Holtzblatt, Jill Drury, Daniel Wales, Laurie Damianos, and Donna Cuomo. 2012. Evaluation of the uses and benefits of a social business platform. CHI 2012 EA, 721--736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jina Huh and Mark S. Ackerman. 2010. Exploring social dimensions of personal information management with adults with AD/HD. CHI 2010 EA, 3715--3720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Michal Jacovi, Ido Guy, Shiri Kremer-Davidson, Sara Porat, and Netta Alzenbud-Reshef. 2014. The perception of others: Inferring reputation from social media in the enterprise. Proc. CSCW 2014, 756--766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Anup Kalia, Hamid Reza Motahari Nezhad, Claudio Bartolini, and Munindar Singh. 2013. Identifying business tasks and commitments from email and chat Conversations. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi= 10.1.1.643.5660&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Amirrudin Kamsin, Ann Blandford, and Anna L. Cox. 2012. Personal task management: My tools fall apart when I'm very busy! CHI 2012 EA, 1369--1374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. David Karger. 2011. Creating user interfaces that entice people to manage better information. Proc CIKM 2011, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Thomas Kreifelts, Elke Hinrichs, and Gary Woetzel. 1993. Sharing to-do lists with a distributed task manager. Proc ECSCW 1993, 31--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Michel Krieger, Emily Stark, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2009. Coordinating tasks on the commons: Designing for personal goals, expertise, and serendipity. Proc. CHI 2009, 1485--1494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Shreya Kumar, Charles Wallace, and Michael Young. 2016. Mentoring trajectories in an evolving agile workplace. Proc. ICSE 2016, 142--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Walid Maalej. 2009. Task-first or context-first? Tool integration revisited. Proc. CASE 2009, 344--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wendy E. Mackay. 1999. Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. TOCHI 6(4), 311--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wendy E. Mackay. 1998. More than just a communication system: Diversity in the use of electronic mail. Proc. CSCW 1998, 344--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Gloria Mark, Victor M. Gonzalez, and Justin Harris. 2005. No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. Proc. CHI 2005, 321--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Nikolay Mehandjiev, Todor Stoitsev, Olaf Grebner, Stefan Scheidl, and Uwe Riss. 2008. End-user development for task management: Survey of attitudes and practices. Proc. VL/HCC 2008, 166--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Michael Muller, Werner Geyer, Beth Brownholtz, Eric Wilcox, and David R Millen. 2004. One-hundred days in an activity-centric collaboration environment based on shared objects. Proc. CHI 2004, 375--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Michael Muller, David R. Millen, and Jonathan Feinberg. 2010. Patterns of usage in an enterprise filesharing service: Publishing, discovering, and telling the news. Proc. CHI 2010, 763--766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Leysia Palen. 1999. Social, individual & technological issues for groupware calendar systems. Proc. CHI 1999, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Beryl Plimmer and Mark Apperley. 2007. Making paper work. Proc. CHINZ 2007, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Laura Ramos, Elise van den Hoven, and Laurie Miller. 2016. Designing for the other 'hereafter': When older adults remember about forgetting. Proc CHI 2016, 721--732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ilaria Redaelli and Antonella Carassa. 2015. Coordination-artifacts suiting: When plans are in the midst of ordering systems. Proc. CSCW 2015, 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Kjeld Schmidt. 2011. Cooperative work and coordinative practices Contributions to the foundations of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). Springer, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. CSCW 1(1), 740.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Kjeld Schmidt, Ina Wagner, and Marianne Tolar. 2007. Permutations of cooperative work practices: A study of two oncology clinics. Proc. GROUP 2007, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Peter Scupelli, Sara Kiesler, Susan R. Fussell, and Congrui Chen. 2005. Project view IM: A tool for juggling mutiple projects and teams. Proc. CHI 2005, 1773--1776, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. N. Sadat Shami, Michael Muller, and David R. Millen. 2011. Browse and discover: Social file sharing in the enterprise. Proc. CSCW 2011, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Nikash Singh, Martin Tomitsch, and Mary Lou Maher. 2013. A time and place for preparatory methods in email. Proc. CHINZ 2013, Art. 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Norman Siu, Lee Iverson, and Anthony Tang. 2006. Going with the flow: Email awareness and task management. Proc. CSCW 2006, 441--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Preethi Srinivas. 2015. Modeling clinical workflow in daily ICU rounds to support task-based patient monitoring and care. CHI 2015 EA, 105--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Susan Leigh Star and James Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Jürgen Steimle. 2009. Designing pen-and-paper user interfaces for interaction with documents. Proc. TEI 2009, 197--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Anselm Strauss. 1988. The articulation of project work: An organizational process. Soc. Quart. 29(2), 163--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Anselm Strauss, Shizuko Fagerhaugh, Barbara Suczek and Carolyn Wiener. 1985. Social organization of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Lucy A. Suchman. 1997. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Human values and the design of computer technology, Stanford 91--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Chuan-Hoo Tan, Juliana Sutanto, and Bernard C.Y. Tan. 2015. Empirical investigation of relational social capital in a virtual community for website programming. ACM SIGMis Database 46(2), 43--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Thea Turner, Pernille Ovarfordt, Jacob T. Biehl, Gene Golovchinsky, and Maribeth Back. 2010. Exploring the workplace communication ecology. Proc. CHI 2010, 841--850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Gina Venoglia, Laura Dabbish, J.J. Cadiz, and Anoop Gupta. 2001. Supporting email workflow. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/coet/0188.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Steve Whittaker, Victoria Bellotti, and Jacek Gwizdka. 2006. Email in personal information management. CACM 49(1), 68--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Steve Whitaker and Candace Sidner. 1996. Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proc. CHI 1996, 276--283 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Terry Winograd. 1987. A language-action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Hum. Comp. Int. 3(1), 3--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Haiyi Zhu, Jilin Chen, Tara Matthews, Aditya Pal, Herman Badenes, and Robert E. Kraut. 2014. Selecting an effective niche: An ecological view of the success of online communities. Proc. CHI 2014, 301--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What Did I Ask You to Do, by When, and for Whom?: Passion and Compassion in Request Management

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader