skip to main content
research-article

QoS for Long-Range Wireless Sensors Under Duty-Cycle Regulations with Shared Activity Time Usage

Published:22 September 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Long-range radio can connect sensors/IoT devices without complex and costly deployment of relay nodes. However, this flexibility comes with stricter legal regulations such as maximum radio activity time per 1-hour period. Under such constraints it is difficult to provide service guarantees, which is quite paradoxical when devices are deployed for surveillance systems. The approach we propose allows devices to go “exceptionally” beyond the activity time limitation by borrowing time from other devices. The mechanism is not intended to be used on a regular basis, where a device is commissioned to always report data at a rate that makes it consuming more than the allowed duty-cycle limitation, but to offer a “last chance” solution for providing better surveillance service guarantees while globally satisfying duty-cycle regulations. The proposition has been implemented on our long-range image sensor platform, and preliminary experiments show that it can maintain the system’s consistency and keep the number of control messages small while being capable of handling sleep-wakeup behavior and dynamic insertion of new devices. Although initially targeted for image sensors, the proposition can also be deployed to increase the quality of service of traditional sensors by guaranteeing that important messages can be sent despite the duty-cycle regulation limit.

References

  1. LoRa Alliance. 2015. LoRaWAN Specification, v1.0. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Chen, P. Ahammad, C. Boyer, S.-I. Huang, L. Lin, E. Lobaton, M. Meingast, S. Oh, S. Wang, P. Yan, A. Y. Yang, C. Yeo, L.-C. Chang, J. D. Tygar, and S. S. Sastry. 2008. CITRIC: A low-bandwidth wireless camera network platform. In 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras, 2008 (ICDSC’08). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ETSI. 2012. Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Short Range Devices (SRD); Radio equipment to be used in the 25 MHz to 1 000 MHz frequency range with power levels ranging up to 500 mW; Part 1: Technical characteristics and test methods. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Goursaud and J. M. Gorce. 2015. Dedicated networks for IoT: PHY/MAC state of the art and challenges. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things 1, 1 (2015), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan. 2000. Energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’00). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Hengstler, D. Prashanth, S. Fong, and H. Aghajan. 2007. MeshEye: A hybrid-resolution smart camera mote for applications in distributed intelligent surveillance. In 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2007 (IPSN’07). 360--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. IBM. 2015. LoRa WAN in C. http://www.research.ibm.com/labs/zurich/ics/lrsc/lmic.html (accessed 7/14/2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Semtech Jeff McKeown. 2016. LoRa™- A communications solution for emerging LPWAN, LPHAN and industrial sensing & IoT applications. http://cwbackoffice.co.uk/docs/Jeff20McKeown.pdf. (accessed 1/13/2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Khanmirza, O. Landsiedel, M. Papatriantafilou, and N. Yazdani. 2014. Evaluating passive neighborhood discovery for low power listening MAC protocols. In IEEE WiMob.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. V. Lecuire, L. Makkaoui, and J.-M. Moureaux. 2012. Fast zonal DCT for energy conservation in wireless image sensor networks. Electronics Letters 48, 2 (2012), 125--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Libelium. 2014. Waspmote LoRa 868MHz 915MHz SX1272 Networking Guide. v4.0-11/2014. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Libelium. 2016. Extreme range links: LoRa 868/915MHz SX1272 LoRa module for Arduino, Raspberry Pi and Intel Galileo. http://www.cooking-hacks.com/documentation/tutorials/extreme-range-lora-sx1272 -module-shield-arduino-raspberry-pi-intel-galileo. (accessed 1/13/2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Paniga, L. Borsani, A. Redondi, M. Tagliasacchi, and M. Cesana. 2011. Experimental evaluation of a video streaming system for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/IFIP Med-Hoc-Net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Pham. 2014. Communication performances of IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor motes for data-intensive applications: A comparison of WaspMote, Arduino MEGA, TelosB, MicaZ and iMote2 for image surveillance. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 46 (2014), 48--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Pham. 2015a. Deploying a pool of long-range wireless image sensor with shared activity time. In 11th IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Pham. 2015b. Low cost wireless image sensor networks for visual surveillance and intrusion detection applications. In 12th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC’15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. C. Pham and V. Lecuire. 2015. Building low-cost wireless image sensor networks: From single camera to multi-camera system. In 9th ACM International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC’15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Pham, A. Makhoul, and R. Saadi. 2011. Risk-based adaptive scheduling in randomly deployed video sensor networks for critical surveillance applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 34, 2 (2011), 783--795. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Polastre, J. Hill, and D. Culler. 2004. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’04). 95--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Rahimi, R. Baer, O. I. Iroezi, J. C. Garcia, J. Warrior, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava. 2005. Cyclops: In situ image sensing and interpretation in wireless sensor networks. In ACM SenSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Semtech. 2014. SX1272/73-860 MHz to 1020 MHz Low Power Long Range Transceiver. Rev.2-07/2014. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Semtech. 2015a. LoRa MAC. https://github.com/Lora-net/LoRaMac-node. (accessed 14/07/2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Semtech. 2015b. LoRa modulation basics. Rev.2-05/2015. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Sha, G. Hackmann, and C. Lu. 2013. Energy-efficient low power listening for wireless sensor networks in noisy environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’13). ACM, New York, NY, 277--288. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1145/2461381.2461415 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. 2004. Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 12, 3 (June 2004), 493--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. QoS for Long-Range Wireless Sensors Under Duty-Cycle Regulations with Shared Activity Time Usage

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 12, Issue 4
      November 2016
      309 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/2994619
      • Editor:
      • Chenyang Lu
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 September 2016
      • Accepted: 1 July 2016
      • Revised: 1 March 2016
      • Received: 1 July 2015
      Published in tosn Volume 12, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader