skip to main content
10.1145/2906388.2906408acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobility Modeling and Prediction in Bike-Sharing Systems

Published:20 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

As an innovative mobility strategy, public bike-sharing has grown dramatically worldwide. Though providing convenient, low-cost and environmental-friendly transportation, the unique features of bike-sharing systems give rise to problems to both users and operators. The primary issue among these problems is the uneven distribution of bicycles caused by the ever-changing usage and (available) supply. This bicycle imbalance issue necessitates efficient bike re-balancing strategies, which depends highly on bicycle mobility modeling and prediction. In this paper, for the first time, we propose a spatio-temporal bicycle mobility model based on historical bike-sharing data, and devise a traffic prediction mechanism on a per-station basis with sub-hour granularity. We extensively evaluated the performance of our design through a one-year dataset from the world's largest public bike-sharing system (BSS) with more than 2800 stations and over 103 million check in/out records. Evaluation results show an 85 percentile relative error of 0.6 for both check in and check out prediction. We believe this new mobility modeling and prediction approach can advance the bike re-balancing algorithm design and pave the way for the rapid deployment and adoption of bike-sharing systems across the globe.

References

  1. LLC MetroBike. The Bike Sharing World - 2014 -Year End Data. http://bike-sharing.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-bike-sharing-world-2014-year-end.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wikipedia. List of Bicycle-sharing Systems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bicycle-sharing_systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jon Froehlich, Joachim Neumann, and Nuria Oliver. Sensing and Predicting the Pulse of the City through Shared Bicycling. In IJCAI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Rodrigo Meza, Jens Grivolla, Joan Codina, and Rafael Banchs. Urban Cycles and Mobility Patterns: Exploring and Predicting Trends in a Bicycle-based Public Transport System. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(4):455--466, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Patrick Vogel and Dirk C. Mattfeld. Strategic and Operational Planning of Bike-Sharing Systems by Data Mining - A Case Study. In Computational Logistics, pages 127--141. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pierre Borgnat, Eric Fleury, Céline Robardet, and Antoine Scherrer. Spatial Analysis of Dynamic Movements of Vélo'v, Lyon's Shared Bicycle Program. In European Conference on Complex Systems (ECCS), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yexin Li, Yu Zheng, Huichu Zhang, and Lei Chen. Traffic Prediction in a Bike Sharing System. In ACM SIGSPATIAL, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Susan a. Shaheen, Hua Zhang, Elliot Martin, and Stacey Guzman. China's Hangzhou Public Bicycle. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2247(1):33--41, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Wikipedia. Hangzhou Public Bicycle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangzhou_Public_Bicycle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eoin O Mahony and David B Shmoys. Data Analysis and Optimization for (Citi) Bike Sharing. In AAAI, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nicolas Gast, Guillaume Massonnet, Daniël Reijsbergen, and Mirco Tribastone. Probabilistic forecasts of bike-sharing systems for journey planning. In ACM CIKM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Leo Breiman. Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5--32, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Longbiao Chen, Daqing Zhang, Gang Pan, Xiaojuan Ma, Dingqi Yang, Kostadin Kushlev, Wangsheng Zhang, and Shijian Li. Bike Sharing Station Placement Leveraging Heterogeneous Urban Open Data. In ACM Ubicomp, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Citi Bike. New York City Bike-sharing System Data. https://www.citibikenyc.com/system-data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Desheng Zhang, Jun Huang, Ye Li, Fan Zhang, Chengzhong Xu, and Tian He. Exploring Human Mobility with Multi-source Data at Extremely Large Metropolitan Scales. In ACM MobiCom, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lihuan Zhang, Siyuan Tang, Zidong Yang, Ji Hu, Yuanchao Shu, Peng Cheng, and Jiming Chen. Demo: Data Analysis and Visualization in Bike-Sharing Systems. http://www.sensornet.cn/bikevis/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Susan a. Shaheen, Stacey Guzman, and Hua Zhang. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143:159--167, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Susan a. Shaheen, Adam P. Cohen, and Elliot W. Martin. Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator Understanding and Emerging Trends. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387:83--92, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephen D. Parkes, Greg Marsden, Susan A. Shaheen, and Adam P. Cohen. Understanding the Diffusion of Public Bikesharing Systems: Evidence from Europe and North America. Journal of Transport Geography, 31:94--103, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rahul Nair, Elise Miller-Hooks, Robert C. Hampshire, and Ana Bušić. Large-Scale Vehicle Sharing Systems: Analysis of Vélib'. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1):85--106, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. LDA Consulting Washington. 2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report. Technical Report 202, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot W. Martin and Susan A. Shaheen. Evaluating Public Transit Modal Shift Dynamics in Response to Bikesharing: A Tale of Two U.S. Cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 41:315--324, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ahmadreza Faghih Imani, Naveen Eluru, Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, Michael Rabbat, and Usama Haq. How does Land-use and Urban Form Impact Bicycle Flows: Evidence from the Bicycle-sharing System (BIXI) in Montreal. Transport Geography, (February):1--20, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Paul DeMaio. Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(DeMaio 2004):41--56, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Department for City Planning New York. Bike-Share. Opportunities in New York City. Technical report, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. P. Borgnat, C. Robardet, P. Abry, P. Flandrin, J. Rouquier, and N. Tremblay. A Dynamical Network View of Lyon's Vélo'v Shared Bicycle System. In Dynamics On and Of Complex Networks, volume 2, chapter A Dynamical, pages 267--284. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. C Ome and Oukhellou Latifa. Model-Based Count Series Clustering for Bike Sharing System Usage Mining : A Case Study with the Vélib System of Paris. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(3):1--21, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ji Won Yoon, Fabio Pinelli, and Francesco Calabrese. Cityride: A Predictive Bike Sharing Journey Advisor. In IEEE ICMDM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Juan Carlos García-Palomares, Javier Gutiénrrez, and Marta Latorre. Optimizing the Location of Stations in Bike-sharing Programs: A GIS Approach. Applied Geography, 35(1--2):235--246, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Juan P. Romero, Angel Ibeas, Jose L. Moura, Juan Benavente, and Borja Alonso. A Simulation-optimization Approach to Design Efficient Systems of Bike-sharing. Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation, 54:646--655, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jenn-Rong Lin and Ta-Hui Yang. Strategic Design of Public Bicycle Sharing Systems with Service Level Constraints. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(2):284--294, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Tal Raviv, Michal Tzur, and IrisA. Forma. Static Repositioning in a Bike-sharing System: Models and Solution Approaches. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 2(3):187--229, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jia Shu, Mabel C. Chou, Qizhang Liu, Chung-Piaw Teo, and I-Lin Wang. Models for Effective Deployment and Redistribution of Bicycles Within Public Bicycle-Sharing Systems. Operations Research, 61(6):1346--1359, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Contardo, Claudio, Catherine Morency, and Louis-Martin Rousseau. Balancing a Dynamic Public Bike-sharing System. Technical report, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jasper Schuijbroek, Robert Hampshire, and Willem-Jan van Hoeve. Inventory Rebalancing and Vehicle Routing in Bike Sharing Systems. Technical report, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Raghu Ganti, Mudhakar Srivatsa, Anand Ranganathan, and Jiawei Han. Inferring Human Mobility Patterns from Taxicab Location Traces. In ACM UbiComp, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sourav Bhattacharya, Santi Phithakkitnukoon, Petteri Nurmi, Arto Klami, Marco Veloso, and Carlos Bento. Gaussian Process-based Predictive Modeling for Bus Ridership. In ACM UbiComp, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Neal Lathia and Licia Capra. How Smart is Your Smartcard?: Measuring Travel Behaviours, Perceptions, and Incentives. In ACM UbiComp, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Fosca Giannotti, Mirco Nanni, Dino Pedreschi, Fabio Pinelli, Chiara Renso, Salvatore Rinzivillo, and Roberto Trasarti. Unveiling the Complexity of Human Mobility by Querying and Mining Massive Trajectory Data. The VLDB Journal, 20(5):695--719, October 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Jungkeun Yoon, Brian D. Noble, Mingyan Liu, and Minkyong Kim. Building Realistic Mobility Models from Coarse-grained Traces. In ACM MobiSys, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jennie Steshenko, Vasanta G. Chaganti, and James Kurose. Mobility in a Large-scale WiFi Network: From Syslog Events to Mobile User Sessions. In ACM MSWiM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sibren Isaacman, Richard Becker, Ramón Cáceres, Margaret Martonosi, James Rowland, Alexander Varshavsky, and Walter Willinger. Human Mobility Modeling at Metropolitan Scales. In ACM MobiSys, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Eunjoon Cho, Seth A. Myers, and Jure Leskovec. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In ACM KDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mobility Modeling and Prediction in Bike-Sharing Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiSys '16: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services
        June 2016
        440 pages
        ISBN:9781450342698
        DOI:10.1145/2906388

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 June 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MobiSys '16 Paper Acceptance Rate31of197submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

        Upcoming Conference

        MOBISYS '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      ePub

      View this article in ePub.

      View ePub