skip to main content
research-article

All-hex meshing using closed-form induced polycube

Published:11 July 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The polycube-based hexahedralization methods are robust to generate all-hex meshes without internal singularities. They avoid the difficulty to control the global singularity structure for a valid hexahedralization in frame-field based methods. To thoroughly utilize this advantage, we propose to use a frame field without internal singularities to guide the polycube construction. Theoretically, our method extends the vector fields associated with the polycube from exact forms to closed forms, which are curl free everywhere but may be not globally integrable. The closed forms give additional degrees of freedom to deal with the topological structure of high-genus models, and also provide better initial axis alignment for subsequent polycube generation. We demonstrate the advantages of our method on various models, ranging from genus-zero models to high-genus ones, and from single-boundary models to multiple-boundary ones.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a124.mp4

mp4

268.3 MB

References

  1. Aspert, N., Cruz, D. S., and Ebrahimi, T. 2002. MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the hausdorff distance. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 705--708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bochkanov, S. n.d. Alglib (www.alglib.net).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bommes, D., Zimmer, H., and Kobbelt, L. 2009. Mixed-integer quadrangulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 3 (July), 77:1--77:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carbonera, C., Shepherd, J., and Shepherd, J. 2006. A constructive approach to constrained hexahedral mesh generation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Meshing Roundtable. 435--452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dey, T. K., and Guha, S. 1998. Computing homology groups 3 of simplicial complexes in R<sup>3</sup>. J. ACM 45, 2 (Mar.), 266--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dey, T. K., Fan, F., and Wang, Y. 2013. An efficient computation of handle and tunnel loops via reeb graphs. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 4 (July), 32:1--32:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gao, X., Deng, Z., and Chen, G. 2015. Hexahedral mesh reparameterization from aligned base-complex. ACM Transactions on Graphics 34, 4 (July), 142:1--142:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. García, I., Xia, J., He, Y., Xin, S., and Patow, G. 2013. Interactive applications for sketch-based editable polycube map. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 7, 1158--1171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gregson, J., Sheffer, A., and Zhang, E. 2011. All-hex mesh generation via volumetric polycube deformation. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 5, 1407--1416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Huang, J., Tong, Y., Wei, H., and Bao, H. 2011. Boundary aligned smooth 3d cross-frame field. ACM Transactions on Graphics 30, 6 (Dec), 143:1--143:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Huang, J., Jiang, T., Shi, Z., Tong, Y., Bao, H., and Desbrun, M. 2014. l<sub>1</sub>-based construction of polycube maps from complex shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics 33, 3 (June), 25:1--25:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jiang, T., Huang, J., Wang, Y., Tong, Y., and Bao, H. 2014. Frame field singularity correction for automatic hexahedralization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 8, 1189--1199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jiang, T., Fang, X., Huang, J., Bao, H., Tong, Y., and Desbrun, M. 2015. Frame field generation through metric customization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 34, 4 (July), 40:1--40:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kowalski, N., Ledoux, F., and Frey, P. 2014. Block-structured hexahedral meshes for cad models using 3d frame fields. Procedia Engineering 82, 59--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Li, Y., Liu, Y., Xu, W., Wang, W., and Guo, B. 2012. All-hex meshing using singularity-restricted field. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 6 (Nov.), 177:1--177:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lin, J., Jin, X., Fan, Z., and Wang, C. C. L. 2008. Automatic polycube-maps. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Geometric Modeling and Processing, 3--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Livesu, M., Vining, N., Sheffer, A., Gregson, J., and Scateni, R. 2013. Polycut: Monotone graph-cuts for polycube base-complex construction. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 6 (Nov.), 171:1--171:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Livesu, M., Sheffer, A., Vining, N., and Tarini, M. 2015. Practical hex-mesh optimization via edge-cone rectification. ACM Transactions on Graphics 34, 4 (July), 141:1--141:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nieser, M., Reitebuch, U., and Polthier, K. 2011. Cube-cover - parameterization of 3d volumes. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 5, 1397--1406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Panozzo, D., Puppo, E., Tarini, M., and Sorkine-Hornung, O. 2014. Frame fields: Anisotropic and nonorthogonal cross fields. ACM Transactions on Graphics 33, 4 (July), 134:1--134:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sheffer, A., Etzion, M., Rappoport, A., and Bercovier, M. 1999. Hexahedral mesh generation using the embedded voronoi graph. Engineering with Computers 15, 3, 248--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shepherd, J. F., and Johnson, C. R. 2008. Hexahedral mesh generation constraints. Engineering With Computers 24, 3, 195--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shepherd, J. F., Mitchell, S. A., Knupp, P. M., and White, D. R. 2000. Methods for multisweep automation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Meshing Roundtable, 77--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shimada, K. 2006. Current trends and issues in automatic mesh generation. Computer-Aided Design & Applications 3, 741--750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Staten, M., Owen, S., and Blacker, T. 2005. Unconstrained paving and plastering: A new idea for all hexahedral mesh generation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Meshing Roundtable. 399--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tarini, M., Hormann, K., Cignoni, P., and Montani, C. 2004. Polycube-maps. ACM Transactions on Graphics 23, 3 (Aug.), 853--860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wächter, A., and Biegler, T. L. 2005. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming 106, 1, 25--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. All-hex meshing using closed-form induced polycube

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
            ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 35, Issue 4
            July 2016
            1396 pages
            ISSN:0730-0301
            EISSN:1557-7368
            DOI:10.1145/2897824
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 July 2016
            Published in tog Volume 35, Issue 4

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader