skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858474acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Detecting Swipe Errors on Touchscreens using Grip Modulation

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We show that when users make errors on mobile devices they make immediate and distinct physical responses that can be observed with standard sensors. We used three standard cognitive tasks (Flanker, Stroop and SART) to induce errors from 20 participants. Using simple low-resolution capacitive touch sensors placed around a standard mobile device and the built-in accelerometer, we demonstrate that errors can be predicted at low error rates from micro-adjustments to hand grip and movement in the period shortly after swiping the touchscreen. Specifically, when combining features derived from hand grip and movement we obtain a mean AUC of 0.96 (with false accept and reject rates both below 10%). Our results demonstrate that hand grip and movement provide strong and low latency evidence for mistakes. The ability to detect user errors in this way could be a valuable component in future interaction systems, allowing interfaces to make it easier for users to correct erroneous inputs.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1909-mohd-noor.mp4

mp4

210.6 MB

References

  1. Andrew Campbell, Tanzeem Choudhury, Shaohan Hu, Hong Lu, Matthew K Mukerjee, Mashfiqui Rabbi, and Rajeev DS Raizada. 2010. NeuroPhone: brain-mobile phone interface using a wireless EEG headset. In Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Networking, systems, and applications on mobile handhelds. ACM, 3--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Julin Candia, Marta C Gonzlez, Pu Wang, Timothy Schoenharl, Greg Madey, and Albert-Lszl Barabsi. 2008. Uncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 22 (2008), 224015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2 (2011), 27:1--27:27. Issue 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chih-Jen Chang, Chih-Chung; Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 3, Article 27 (May 2011), 27:1--27:27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ricardo Chavarriaga, Pierre W Ferrez, and Jose del R Millan. 2008. To err is human: Learning from error potentials in brain-computer interfaces. In Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics ICCN 2007. Springer, 777--782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. James Clawson, Kent Lyons, Alex Rudnick, Robert A Iannucci Jr, and Thad Starner. 2008. Automatic whiteout++: correcting mini-QWERTY typing errors using keypress timing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 573--582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stephen A Coombes, Kelly M Gamble, James H Cauraugh, and Christopher M Janelle. 2008. Emotional states alter force control during a feedback occluded motor task. Emotion 8, 1 (2008), 104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bernardo Dal Seno, Matteo Matteucci, and Luca Mainardi. 2010. Online Detection of P300 and Error Potentials in a BCI Speller. Intell. Neuroscience 2010, Article 11 (Jan. 2010), 1 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Barbara A Eriksen and Charles W Eriksen. 1974. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & psychophysics 16, 1 (1974), 143--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pierre W Ferrez and Jose del R Millan. 2005. You are wrong!-Automatic detection of interaction errors from brain waves. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 19. LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES LTD, 1413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. WJ Gehring, MGH Coles, DE Meyer, and E Donchin. 1990. The error-related negativity: an event-related brain potential accompanying errors. Psychophysiology 27, 4 (1990), S34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mehmet Gonen and Ethem Alpaydın. 2011. Multiple kernel learning algorithms. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2211--2268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Joshua Goodman, Gina Venolia, Keith Steury, and Chauncey Parker. 2002. Language modeling for soft keyboards. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 194--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yuta Higuchi and Takashi Okada. 2014. User Interface Using Natural Gripping FeaturesGrip UI. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Clay B Holroyd and Michael GH Coles. 2002. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological review 109, 4 (2002), 679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Per-Ola Kristensson and Shumin Zhai. 2005. Relaxing stylus typing precision by geometric pattern matching. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Lehne, K. Ihme, A.-M. Brouwer, J. van Erp, and T.O. Zander. 2009. Error-related EEG patterns during tactile human-machine interaction. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, 2009. ACII 2009. 3rd International Conference on. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Qiang Li, John Stankovic, Mark Hanson, Adam T Barth, John Lach, Gang Zhou, and others. 2009. Accurate, fast fall detection using gyroscopes and accelerometer-derived posture information. In Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2009. BSN 2009. Sixth International Workshop on. IEEE, 138--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. I Scott MacKenzie. 2012. Human-computer interaction: An empirical research perspective. Newnes. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jillian Madison. 2012. Damn you, autocorrect! Random House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Perrin Margaux, Maby Emmanuel, Daligault Sébastien, Bertrand Olivier, and Mattout Jérémie. 2012. Objective and subjective evaluation of online error correction during P300-based spelling. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2012 (2012), 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J Timothy Noteboom, Kerry R Barnholt, and Roger M Enoka. 2001. Activation of the arousal response and impairment of performance increase with anxiety and stressor intensity. Journal of applied physiology 91, 5 (2001), 2093--2101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nishkam Ravi, Nikhil Dandekar, Preetham Mysore, and Michael L Littman. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In AAAI, Vol. 5. 1541--1546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ian H Robertson, Tom Manly, Jackie Andrade, Bart T Baddeley, and Jenny Yiend. 1997. Oops!: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35, 6 (1997), 747--758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Marten K Scheffers and Michael GH Coles. 2000. Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 1 (2000), 141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tom Sharma, Nandita; Gedeon. 2013. Optimal Time Segments for Stress Detection. In Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition, Petra Perner (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7988. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 421--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J Ridley Stroop. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology 18, 6 (1935), 643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Chi Vi and Sriram Subramanian. 2012. Detecting Error-related Negativity for Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Chi Thanh Vi, Izdihar Jamil, David Coyle, and Sriram Subramanian. 2014. Error Related Negativity in Observing Interactive Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3787--3796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Daryl Weir, Henning Pohl, Simon Rogers, Keith Vertanen, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2014. Uncertain text entry on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2307--2316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Detecting Swipe Errors on Touchscreens using Grip Modulation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader