skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858420acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Honorable Mention

Breaking Down While Building Up: Design and Decline in Emerging Infrastructures

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper asks what can we learn from breaking down systems to understand the development of systems. Through ethnographic fieldwork around a large-scale infrastructure development project in the ocean sciences experiencing a scale downward and threat of further defunding, I highlight four often overlooked components of innovation and development that have important implications for the HCI community. The first debunks the mythical liquidation and restart of Western development's "fail fast, fail often" mantra by tracing the complexities of breaking down an infrastructure, highlighting that the end of a technology is entrenched in longer-lived social, political and organizational consequences. The second dives deeper into these social consequences, as formalized structures are broken down and new temporary and contingent working orders surface to fill their place. Third, I signal the critical consequences of the thoughtful practices of assessment and evaluation of both human and material resources that occur during the downturn of systems. Last, I discuss the deeply personal connections that amplify through processes of breaking down systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p2198-steinhardt.mp4

mp4

286.6 MB

References

  1. Adams, V., Murphy, M. Clarke, A. 2009. Anticipation: Technoscience, Life, Affect, Temporality. Subjectivity, 28, 246--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, R., Kolko, B., Schlenke, L., Brunette, W., Hope, A., Nathan, R., Gerard, W., Keh, J. Kawooya, M. 2012. The midwife's assistant: designing integrated learning tools to scaffold ultrasound practice. In Proc. of ICTD '12, 200--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Borgman, C.L. 2011. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Blevis, E. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. In Proc. CHI '07, 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. 1999. Sorting Things Out. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boym, S. 2010. Ruins of the avant-garde: From Tatlin's tower to paper architecture. Hell, J. and Schonle, A. (eds.) Ruins of Modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 58--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhushan, B. 2015. Perspective: Science and technology policy -- What is at stake and why should scientists participate? Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 887--900.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cairns, S. and Jacobs, J. 2014. Buildings Must Die. Boston: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, R. 2014. Silicon Valley's Culture of Failure and the Walking Dead it Leaves Behind. The Guardian. Retrieved January 8, 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/28/sil icon-valley-startup-failure-culture-success-mythGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohn, M. 2013. Lifetimes and Legacies: Temporalities of Sociotechnical Change in a Long-Lived System. UCI, dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohn, M., "Convivial Decay: Entangled Lifetimes in a Geriatric Infastructure". In Proc. of CSCW '16, forthcoming. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Corbin, J.M. and Strauss, A. 2007. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Densmore, M.R. 2010. Claim Mobile: When to Fail a Technology. In Proc. of CHI' 2012, 1833--1842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. DeSilvey, C. and Edensor, T. 2012. Reckoning with Ruins. Progress in Human Geography, 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. DeSilvey, C. 2006. Observed Decay: Telling Stories with Mutable Things. Journal of Material Culture, 11(3), 318--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Doughton, S. 2015. Did she blow? NW Submarine volcano likely just erupted. The Seattle Times.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards, P. 2003. Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems. Modernity and technology, 185--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards, P. N., Mayernik, M. S., Batcheller, A. L., Bowker, G. C., & Borgman, C. L. 2011. Science friction: Data, Metadata and collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 667--690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gallagher, S. 2013. Why US Government fails so hard, so often, Ars Technica. Retrieved January 8, 2015 from http://arstechnica.com/informationtechnology/2013/10/why-us-government-it-fails-sohard-so-often/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, S. and Thrift, N. 2007. Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Heeks R. 2008. ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Howison, J. and Herbsleb, J.D. 2011. Scientific software production: incentives and collaboration. In Proc. of CSCW '11, 513--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jackson, S.J., Barbrow, S. 2013. Infrastructure and vocation: field, calling and computation in ecology. In Proc. of CHI '13, 2873--2882. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jackson, S.J. and Barbrow, S. 2015. Standards and/as Innovation: Protocols, Creativity and Interactive Systems Development in Ecology. In Proc. of CHI '15, 1769--1778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jackson, S.J., and Buyuktur, A. 2014. Who Killed WATERS? Mess, Method, and Forensic Explanation in the Making and Unmaking of Large-Scale Science Networks. Science Technology and Human Values, 39(2), 285--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jackson, S.J. 2014. Rethinking Repair, in Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society. Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. Foot, K. (eds.), Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Karasti, H., Baker, K.S., Millerand, F. 2010. Infrastructure Time: Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19(3--4), 377--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kiger, P.J. 2015. Undersea Volcano Erupts a Mile Below the Surface. Discovery. Retrieved January 8, 2015 from http://news.discovery.com/earth/oceans/underseavolcano-erupts-a-mile-below-the-surface-150604.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, C. P., Dourish, P., Mark, G. 2006. The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. In Proc. of CSCW '06, 483--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Linde, C. 1993. Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Messeri, L. and Vertesi, J. 2015. Greatest Missions Never Flown: Anticipatory Discourse and the "Projectory" in Technological Communities. Technology & Culture, 56(1), 54--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Odom, W. Pierce, J. Stolterman, E., Blevis, E. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. of CHI '09, 1053--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Perrow, C. 1984. Normal accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Ribes, D. and Finholt, T.A. 2009. The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 375--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ribes, D. 2014. Ethnography of scaling, or, how to fit a national research infrastructure in the room. In Proc. of CSCW '14, 158--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Rosner, D. K. 2012. The material practices of collaboration. In Proc. of CSCW '12, 1155--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sims, B. and Henke, C.R. 2012. Repairing Credibility: Repositioning Nuclear Weapons knowledge after the Cold War. Social Studies of Science, 0(0), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. 1996. Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Steinhardt, S.B. Jackson, S.J. 2015. Anticipation Work: Plans and temporal alignment in collaborative scientific work. In Proc. of CSCW '14, 134--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Tomlinson, T., Silberman, M., Patterson, D., Pan, Y, Blevis, E. 2012. Collapse informatics: augmenting the sustainability & ICT4D discourse in HCI. In Proc. of CHI '12, 655--664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ureta, S. 2014. Normalizing Transantiago: On the challenges (and limits) of repairing infrastructures. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 368--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Vaughn, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Vertesi, J. and Dourish, P. 2011. The Value of Data: Considering the Context of Production in Data Economies. In Proc. of CSCW '11, 533--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Warschauer, M. and Ames, M. 2010. Can One Laptop Per Child Save the World's Poor? Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 33--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilcock, W. 2015. The Shambolic State of the Ocean Observatories Initiative: Time to Speak Up. Retrieved September 25, 2015 from http://faculty.washington.edu/wilcock/?p=240Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Witze, A. 2013. Marine science: Oceanography's billion-dollar baby, Nature, 501, 480--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Witze, A. 2014. Ocean observatory project hits rough water, Nature, 515, 474--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Breaking Down While Building Up: Design and Decline in Emerging Infrastructures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader