ABSTRACT
The peak-end rule is a psychological heuristic observing that people's retrospective assessment of an experience is strongly influenced by the intensity of the peak and final moments of that experience. We examine how aspects of game player experience are influenced by peak-end manipulations to the sequence of events in games that are otherwise objectively identical. A first experiment examines players' retrospective assessments of two games (a pattern matching game based on Bejeweled and a point-and-click reaction game) when the sequence of difficulty is manipulated to induce positive, negative and neutral peak-end effects. A second experiment examines assessments of a shootout game in which the balance between challenge and skill is similarly manipulated. Results across the games show that recollection of challenge was strongly influenced by peak-end effects; however, results for fun, enjoyment, and preference to repeat were varied -- sometimes significantly in favour of the hypothesized effects, sometimes insignificant, but never against the hypothesis.
Supplemental Material
- Abuhamdeh, S. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivating, goal-directed activities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 3 (2012), 317--330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ariely, D. Combining Experiences Over Time: The Effects of Duration, Intensity Changes and On-Line Measurements on Retrospective Pain Evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11 (1998), 1945.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernhaupt, R. (ed.), Game User Experience Evaluation. Springer, 2015. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brave, S. and Nass, C. Emotion in human-computer interaction. in Julie, A.J. and Andrew, S. eds. The human-computer interaction handbook, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2003, 81--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cockburn, A., Quinn, P. and Gutwin, C. Examining the peak-end effects of subjective experience. in Proceedings of CHI'15: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, (2015), 357--366. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cowley, E. and Farrell, C. Retrospective evaluations: Will chance versus luck oriented individuals select different moments of an experience? Advances in Consumer Research, San Antonio, USA, 2006, http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v33/naacr_v33_32. pdf.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, NY, 1991.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Wirtz, D. and Oishi, S. End effects of rated life quality: the James Dean Effect. Psychol Sci. 12, 2 (2001), 124--128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dixon, M. and Verma, R. Sequence effects in service bundles: Implications for service design and scheduling. Journal of Operations Management 31, 3 (2013), 138--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Do, A., Rupert, A. and Wolford, G. Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 1 (2008), 96--98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Finn, B. Ending on a High Note: Adding a Better End to Effortful Study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36, 6 (2010), 15481553.Google Scholar
- Fredrickson, B. and Kahneman, D. Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 1 (1993), 4555.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hamari, J. and Tuunanen, J. Player types: A metasynthsis. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 1, 2 (2014), 29--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harrison, C., Amento, B., Kuznetsov, S. and Bell, R. Rethinking the progress bar. in Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, (2007), 115--118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harrison, C., Yeo, Z. and Hudson, S.E. Faster progress bars: manipulating perceived duration with visual augmentations. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, (2010), 1545--1548. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. and Sandweg, N. From mental effort to perceived usability: transforming experiences into summary assessments CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Vienna, Austria, 2004, 1283--1286 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahneman, D. Evaluation by Moments: Past and Future. in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. eds. Choices, Values and Frames, Cambridge University Press NY, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kahneman, D. Experience Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach. in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. eds. Choices, Values and Frames, Cambridge University Press NY, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B., Schreiber, C. and Redelmeier, D. When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 1 (1993), 401--405.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. and Sarin, R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 2 (1997), 375405.Google Scholar
- Langer, T., Sarin, R. and Weber, M. The retrospective evaluation of payment sequences: duration neglect and peak-and-end effects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58, 1 (2005), 157--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGonigal, J. 2014. Games Can Make a Better World. from http://janemcgonigal.com/2014/01/06/transcriptgames-can-make-a-better-world/.Google Scholar
- Nasiry, J. and Popescu, I. Dynamic Pricing with LossAverse Consumers and Peak-End Anchoring. Operations Research 59, 6 (2011), 1361--1368. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pagulayan, R.J., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R.L. and Fuller, T. User-centered design in games. in Jacko, J., A and Sears, A. eds. The human-computer interaction handbook, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2003, 883--906. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Redelmeier, D.A. and Kahneman, D. Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66, 1 (1996), 3--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Redelmeier, D.A., Katz, J. and Kahneman, D. Memories of colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Pain 104, 1 (2003), 187--194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan, R., Rigby, C.S. and Przybylski, A. The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A SelfDetermination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344--360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Streufert, S. and Streufert, S.C. Effects of conceptual structure, failure, and success on attribution of causality and interpersonal attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11, 2 (1969), 138--147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Švelch, J. Comedy of Contingency: Making Physical Humor in Video Game Spaces. International Journal of Communication 8 (2014), 2530--2552.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P. and Wyeth, P. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (2005), 3--3. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Peak-End Effects on Player Experience in Casual Games
Recommendations
Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games
Sandbox '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video GamesPsychophysiological methods are becoming more popular in game research as covert and reliable measures of affective player experience, emotions, and cognition. Since player experience is not well understood, correlations between self-reports from ...
Player Experience and Enjoyment: A Preliminary Examination of Differences in Video Game Genre
IntroductionPlayer experience is the interaction between individual qualities and game attributes. It is becoming a popular topic to understand why individuals are interested in different video games. The current literature offers a range of ...
The Effects of Graphical Fidelity on Player Experience
AcademicMindTrek '13: Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging MediaGraphical assets in video games have become increasingly complex over the years, but little is known about their effect on player experience (PX). In this paper, we present results of a controlled study with 48 participants comparing how abstract and ...
Comments