James R. Wallace
Nancy Iskander
ABSTRACT
We describe an empirical study that explores how users establish and use personal space around large public displays (LPDs). Our study complements field studies in this space by more fully characterizing interpersonal distances based on coupling and confirms the use of on-screen territories on vertical displays. Finally, we discuss implications for future research: limitations of proxemics and territoriality, how user range can augment existing theory, and the influence of dis- play size on personal space.
- Alec Azad, Jaime Ruiz, Daniel Vogel, Mark Hancock, and Edward Lank. 2012. Territoriality and behaviour on and around large vertical publicly-shared displays. In Proc DIS 2012. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 468--477. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318025 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. Proxemic Interaction: Designing for a Proximity and Orientation-aware Environment. In Proc. ITS 2010. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121--130. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1936652.1936676 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert Beyer, Vincent Binder, Nina Jäger, and Andreas Butz. 2014. The Puppeteer Display: Attracting and Actively Shaping the Audience with an Interactive Public Banner Display. In Proc DIS. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 935--944. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598575 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zachary Cook. 2013. The Simple Multi-Touch Toolkit. In University of Ontario Institute of Technology Student Research Showcase. http://vialab.science.uoit.ca/wordpress/ wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/coo2013a.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2010. Designing Urban Media Façades: Cases and Challenges. In Proc CHI. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2277--2286. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753670 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saul Greenberg, Sebastian Boring, Jo Vermeulen, and Jakub Dostal. 2014. Dark Patterns in Proxemic Interactions: A Critical Perspective. In Proc DIS 2014. ACM, 523--532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598541 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saul Greenberg, Nicolai Marquardt, Till Ballendat, Rob Diaz-Marino, and Miaosen Wang. 2011. Proxemic Interactions: The New Ubicomp? Interactions 18, 1 (2011), 42--50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1897239.1897250 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saul Greenberg and Michael Rounding. 2001. The Notification Collage: Posting Information to Public and Personal Displays. In Proc CHI 2001. ACM, 514--521. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/365024.365339 Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Gutwin and S. Greenberg. 2000. The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. In Proc WET ICE 2000. IEEE, 98--103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2000.883711 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edward T. Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Eva Hornecker. 2008. "I don't understand it either, but it is cool"? Visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. In Proc TABLETOP. IEEE, 113--120.Google Scholar
- Elaine M. Huang and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2003. Semi-public Displays for Small, Co-located Groups. In Proc. CHI 2003. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--56. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642622 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petra Isenberg, Danyel Fisher, Meredith Ringel Morris, Kori Inkpen, and Mary Czerwinski. 2010. An exploratory study of co-located collaborative visual analytics around a tabletop display. In Proc VAST 2010. IEEE, 179--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mikkel Jakobsen and Kasper Hornbaek. 2014. Up Close and Personal: Collaborative Work on a High-resolution Multitouch Wall Display. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 2, Article 11 (2014), 34 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2576099 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wendy G. Ju, Brian A. Lee, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2007. Range: Exploring Proxemics in Collaborative Whiteboard Interaction. In Proc CHI EA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2483--2488. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241028 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Russell Kruger, Sheelagh Carpendale, Stacey D Scott, and Anthony Tang. 2005. Fluid integration of rotation and translation. In Proc CHI 2005. ACM, 601--610. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicolai Marquardt, Robert Diaz-Marino, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2011. The proximity toolkit: prototyping proxemic interactions in ubiquitous computing ecologies. In Proc UIST '11. ACM, 315--326. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047238 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Marshall, Yvonne Rogers, and Nadia Pantidi. 2011. Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. In Proc CSCW. ACM, 445--454. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erik Paluka. 2011. Simple Multi-Touch: A framework for teaching multi-touch computing. In University of Ontario Institute of Technology Student Research Showcase. http://vialab.science.uoit.ca/wordpress/ wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/pal2011a.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Peter Peltonen, Esko Kurvinen, Antti Salovaara, Giulio Jacucci, Tommi Ilmonen, John Evans, Antti Oulasvirta, and Petri Saarikko. 2008. It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proc CHI. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1285--1294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357255 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jun Rekimoto. 1997. Pick-and-drop: A Direct Manipulation Technique for Multiple Computer Environments. In Proc UIST 1997. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/263407.263505 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markus Rittenbruch, Andrew Sorensen, Jared Donovan, Debra Polson, Michael Docherty, and Jeff Jones. 2013. The Cube: A Very Large-scale Interactive Engagement Space. In Proc ITS. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2512349.2512814 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Timothy A. Sandstrom, Chris Henze, and Creon Levit. 2003. The Hyperwall. In Proc. CMV '03. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 124--134. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=937938.937953 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Constantin Schmidt, Jörg Müller, and Gilles Bailly. 2013. Screenfinity: Extending the Perception Area of Content on Very Large Public Displays. In Proc. CHI. ACM, 1719--1728. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466227 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stacey D. Scott, Sheelagh M.T. Carpendale, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2004. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proc. CSCW '04. ACM, 294--303. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031655 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Tang, Melanie Tory, Barry Po, Petra Neumann, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2006. Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. In Proc CHI 2006. ACM, 1181--1190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124950 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In Proc UIST '04. ACM, 137--146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029656 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katherine Vogt, Lauren Bradel, Christopher Andrews, Chris North, Alex Endert, and Duke Hutchings. 2011. Co-located Collaborative Sensemaking on a Large High-resolution Display with Multiple Input Devices. In Proc INTERACT '11. 589--604. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2042118.2042175 Google ScholarDigital Library
- James R. Wallace, Stacey D. Scott, and Carolyn G. MacGregor. 2013. Collaborative Sensemaking on a Digital Tabletop and Personal Tablets: Prioritization, Comparisons, and Tableaux. In Proc CHI 2013. ACM, 3345--3354. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466458 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julie R. Williamson and John Williamson. 2014. Analysing Pedestrian Traffic Around Public Displays. In Proc PerDis. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2611009.2611022 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Creating Your Bubble: Personal Space On and Around Large Public Displays
Recommendations
Up close and personal: Collaborative work on a high-resolution multitouch wall display
Multitouch wall-sized displays afford new forms of collaboration: They can be used up close by several users simultaneously, offer high resolution, and provide sufficient space for intertwining individual and joint work. The difference to displays ...
Demonstrating Proxemic Cursor Input for Touchless Displays
SUI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTouchless gesture interfaces often use cursor-based interactions, where widgets are targeted by a movable cursor and activated with a mid-air gesture. Proxemic cursor interactions are a novel alternative that facilitate faster selection without the need ...
GIAnT: Visualizing Group Interaction at Large Wall Displays
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsLarge interactive displays are increasingly important and a relevant research topic, and several studies have focused on wall interaction. However, in many cases, thorough user studies currently require time-consuming video analysis and coding. We ...
Comments