skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851651acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Trading off accuracy for efficiency by randomized greedy warping

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) is a widely used distance measure for time series data mining. Its quadratic complexity requires the application of various techniques (e.g. warping constraints, lower-bounds) for deployment in real-time scenarios. In this paper we propose a randomized greedy warping algorithm for finding similarity between time series instances. We show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the simple greedy approach and also provides very good time series similarity approximation consistently, as compared to DTW. We show that the Randomized Time Warping (RTW) can be used in place of DTW as a fast similarity approximation technique by trading some classification accuracy for very fast classification.

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal, A. Hinneburg, and D. A. Keim. On the surprising behavior of distance metrics in high dimensional space. In Database Theory - ICDT 2001, pages 420--434. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Bagnall and J. Lines. An experimental evaluation of nearest neighbour time series classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.4757, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. J. Berndt and J. Clifford. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Papers from the 1994 AAAI Workshop, pages 359--370, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Buza, A. Nanopoulos, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Insight: efficient and effective instance selection for time-series classification. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 149--160. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Itakura. Minimum prediction residual principle applied to speech recognition. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 23(1):67--72, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Keogh and C. A. Ratanamahatana. Exact indexing of dynamic time warping. Knowledge and information systems, 7(3):358--386, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Keogh, Q. Zhu, B. Hu, Y. Hao, X. Xi, L. Wei, and C. A. Ratanamahatana. The UCR time series classification/clustering homepage. http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~eamonn/time series data/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S.-W. Kim, S. Park, and W. W. Chu. Efficient processing of similarity search under time warping in sequence databases: an index-based approach. Information Systems, 29(5):405--420, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. MacLean and G. Labahn. Elastic matching in linear time and constant space. In Proc., Ninth IAPR Int'l. Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, pages 551--554, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Müller. Dynamic time warping. In Information Retrieval for Music and Motion, pages 69--84. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. A. Ratanamahatana and E. Keogh. Everything you know about dynamic time warping is wrong. In Third Workshop on Mining Temporal and Sequential Data, pages 22--25, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. A. Ratanamahatana and E. Keogh. Making time-series classification more accurate using learned constraints. In In proc. of SDM Int'l Conf, pages 11--22, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Raza. RTW supplementary content page. https://sites.google.com/site/randomizedtw/, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Sakoe and S. Chiba. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 26(1):43--49, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Salvador and P. Chan. Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. Intelligent Data Analysis, 11(5):561--580, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Spiegel, B.-J. Jain, and S. Albayrak. Fast time series classification under lucky time warping distance. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 71--78. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. X. Xi, E. Keogh, C. Shelton, L. Wei, and C. A. Ratanamahatana. Fast time series classification using numerosity reduction. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pages 1033--1040. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Trading off accuracy for efficiency by randomized greedy warping

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
          April 2016
          2360 pages
          ISBN:9781450337397
          DOI:10.1145/2851613

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 April 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate252of1,047submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader