skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2856502acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Future of Human-Building Interaction

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 2030, we will have a different interactive experience with our built environments, at home, at work, and even in public urban spaces. This is attributed to advancements in sensing and actuation systems that can integrate into the building infrastructures, in symbiosis with the new environmental concerns that call for new life, work, and mobility styles. This change, whether gradual or sudden, evident or seamless, can have a remarkable impact on our everyday experiences, and thus entails efforts to envision possible scenarios and plan for them. We believe that buildings, as they would embody our digital and physical interactive daily experiences, should be designed and nurtured in a dialogue with their users at the individual as well as social levels. This implies a responsibility of the HCI community to intervene and involve the user in the Human-Building Interaction (HBI) design practice. We propose bringing together expertise from the fields of human-computer interaction, building and urban architecture, and social sciences, and provide them with an occasion for collaboratively creating and sharing ``images' of HBI by 2030. The goal is to uncover research opportunities and challenges that will emerge through discussions and multi-faceted debates about the topics proposed.

References

  1. HH Bier. 2014. Robotic buildings (s). Next Generation Building, 1 (1), 2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stewart Brand. 1995. How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tim Coughlan, Michael Brown, Sarah Martindale, Rob Comber, Thomas Ploetz, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Val Mitchell, and Sharon Baurley. 2013. Methods for studying technology in the home. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3207-3210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nick Dalton, Keith Evan Green, Ruth Dalton, Mikael Wiberg, Christoph Hoelscher, Anijo Mathew, Holger Schnädelbach, and Tasos Varoudis. 2014. Interaction and architectural space. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 29- 32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anind K Dey, Gregory D Abowd, and Daniel Salber. 2001. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-computer interaction 16, 2 (2001), 97-166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Banister Fletcher. 1987. A history of architecture. Butterworths.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bill Hillier. 2007. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 19, 3 (2012), 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Farrokh Jazizadeh, Geoffrey Kavulya, J Kwak, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, Milind Tambe, and Wendy Wood. 2012. Human-building interaction for energy conservation in office buildings. In Proc. of the Construction Research Congress. 1830-1839.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hasier Larrea-Tamayo. 2015. ARkits: architectural robotics kits. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarah Mennicken, Amy Hwang, Rayoung Yang, Jesse Hoey, Alex Mihailidis, and Elaine M Huang. 2015. Smart for Life: Designing Smart Home Technologies that Evolve with Users. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2377-2380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Elizabeth D Mynatt, Irfan Essa, and Wendy Rogers. 2000. Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. In Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability. ACM, 65-71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D Norman. 1998. The Invisible Computer. 1998. (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Robert J Orr and Gregory D Abowd. 2000. The smart floor: a mechanism for natural user identification and tracking. In CHI'00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 275-276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Federico Parolotto. 2014. Reversible Infrastructure. Harvard Design Magazine: architecture, landscape architecture, urban design and planning 37 (2014), 112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomas Pederson and Dipak Surie. 2007. Towards an activity-aware wearable computing platform based on an egocentric interaction model. In Ubiquitous Computing Systems. Springer, 211-227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tom Rodden and Steve Benford. 2003. The evolution of buildings and implications for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 9-16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yvonne Rogers, William R Hazlewood, Paul Marshall, Nick Dalton, and Susanna Hertrich. 2010. Ambient influence: Can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change?. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 261-270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Richard Sennett. 2006. The open city. Urban Age (2006), 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jim Waldo. 1999. The Jini architecture for networkcentric computing. Commun. ACM 42, 7 (1999), 76- 82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mark Weiser. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific american 265, 3 (1991), 94-104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Future of Human-Building Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader